Date: Mon, 07 Oct 2002 20:05:52 +0100 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Do we still need portmap(8)? Message-ID: <200210071905.g97J5r41001493@grimreaper.grondar.org> In-Reply-To: <20021007.112056.119814448.imp@bsdimp.com> ; from "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> "Mon, 07 Oct 2002 11:20:56 MDT." References: <20021007.112056.119814448.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In message: <20021007063250.GF14070@wantadilla.lemis.com> > "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > : It's been a while since we've used portmap(8) on -CURRENT systems. Is > : it still needed, or can it be removed completely? At the very least, > : the man page should stop claiming that it's necessary to run NFS. > > I think that we need a mtree.obsolete that goes through and deletes > these sorts of things as part of installworld/upgrade scripts. Having something that warns may be a good idea. Having something that auto-deletes less so. I sometimes keep old stuff on purpose to prevent foot-shooting when the replacement is not up to scratch. No objection if mergemaster asks permission to delete stuff, for example. M -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_ Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200210071905.g97J5r41001493>