Date: 23 Jun 2002 23:15:46 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Installing XFree86 package via sysinstall: need X wrapper or not? Message-ID: <xzphejty9vh.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020623140004.B79416@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20020621134520.G68827@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020621223209.GP76002@squall.waterspout.com> <xzp4rfv3bbb.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020622200545.GS76002@squall.waterspout.com> <20020622204229.GG53232@elvis.mu.org> <xzpheju21z0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3D152EAA.DB201738@FreeBSD.org> <xzp660a16x9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3D162074.A636B067@FreeBSD.org> <xzp6609zsbt.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020623140004.B79416@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> writes: > I guess I need clarification. Since PAM modules aren't versioned, is > there a problem? Or did you rename all the modules with OpenPAM? PAM modules *are* versioned. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzphejty9vh.fsf>