Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 02:20:09 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245176] security/i2p pkg, remove or rebuild *with* docs. Message-ID: <bug-245176-7788-PxRbNHDVir@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-245176-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-245176-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245176 --- Comment #2 from Chris Watson <bsdunix44@gmail.com> --- I'm not looking for blame, certainly not to you. I'm looking for this to be removed. I knew lioux. But that was a long time ago and also irrelevant. I'm not sure what the port did back then. The port currently has a "DOCS=3DYES|= NO" option. So it *can* build with docs. Not only does the pkg not build with docs, the pkg is devoid of any information. It doesn't even run properly as shown above. It's been fifteen years, and there is no way I am the only one to install this, see how broke= n it is, and remove it.=20 Running across stuff like this is like browsing the bug database and seeing open bugs 15 years old *still* not closed. It's *frustrating*. I keep bumpi= ng into several ports that are unmaintained. UGH. Ill take a closer look at th= ose. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245176-7788-PxRbNHDVir>