From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 25 10:41:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5B41065672 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:41:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from nyi.unixathome.org (nyi.unixathome.org [64.147.113.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643218FC08 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:41:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7EE50BAB; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:41:54 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at unixathome.org Received: from nyi.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nyi.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YXw-gmwr-lmx; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:41:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from smtp-auth.unixathome.org (smtp-auth.unixathome.org [10.4.7.7]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by nyi.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE04950B97 ; Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:41:52 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4C74F36B.2060200@langille.org> Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 06:41:47 -0400 From: Dan Langille Organization: The FreeBSD Diary User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andriy Gapon References: <4C71CC62.6060803@langille.org> <4C745213.3050004@langille.org> <20100824233849.GA35100@icarus.home.lan> <4C74C221.5020702@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4C74C221.5020702@icyb.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable , Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: kernel MCA messages X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:41:55 -0000 On 8/25/2010 3:11 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > Have you read the decoded message? > Please re-read it. > > I still recommend reading at least the summary of the RAM ECC research article > to make your own judgment about need to replace DRAM. Andriy: What is your interpretation of the decoded message? What is your view on replacing DRAM? What do you conclude from the summary? -- Dan Langille - http://langille.org/