Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 03:04:19 -0800 From: Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> To: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> Cc: Patrick Hartling <patrick@137.org>, current@freebsd.org, marcel@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe Message-ID: <20021105030419.A19427@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20021105105927.GE26605@elvis.mu.org>; from mux@freebsd.org on Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 02:59:27AM -0800 References: <3DC71B56.1050102@137.org> <20021105105813.GD26605@elvis.mu.org> <20021105105927.GE26605@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* De: Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org> [ Data: 2002-11-05 ] [ Subjecte: Re: uuid.h is not C++ safe ] > Maxime Henrion wrote: > > Patrick Hartling wrote: > > > I was just about to put the new DCE 1.1 UUID functions into use in some > > > C++ code, but linking fails because the function prototypes in uuid.h > > > are not protected with the __cplusplus/extern "C" bits. It's easy > > > enough for me to fix my local copy, but I'm sure this same thing could > > > trip up other people. > > > > This should be fixed with the attached patch. Marcel, can you review > > and commit it please ? Oops, I probably should have pinged Marcel about this, now that I think about it, but anyway, it shouldn't change anything. Even with vanilla cpp(1) both produce the right thing, with or without __cplusplus defined, and both produce the identical thing (moins linenos/whitespace) in the C case. Of course, both <uuid.h> and <sys/uuid.h> needed changed, as both define protos, and <sys/uuid.h> is included into <uuid.h>. Yuck :) -- Juli Mallett <jmallett@FreeBSD.org> | FreeBSD: The Power To Serve Will break world for fulltime employment. | finger jmallett@FreeBSD.org http://people.FreeBSD.org/~jmallett/ | Support my FreeBSD hacking! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021105030419.A19427>