From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 26 17:24:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB1B10658F0; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:24:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 334CC8FC19; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:24:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (adsl-1-207-68.bna.bellsouth.net [65.1.207.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n1QHMdTl020100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:22:39 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: Anonymous In-Reply-To: <86iqmxo5kh.fsf@gmail.com> References: <200902240100.n1O10L0h095606@freefall.freebsd.org> <1235439881.1273.1.camel@widget.2hip.net> <86iqn0ldcx.fsf@gmail.com> <1235452157.1273.10.camel@widget.2hip.net> <86iqmxo5kh.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6JMZJPG0vWaj/p4XyguP" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:23:53 -0600 Message-Id: <1235669033.1289.4.camel@widget.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.4 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org, edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/132035: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 17:24:05 -0000 --=-6JMZJPG0vWaj/p4XyguP Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 13:28 +0300, Anonymous wrote: > Robert Noland writes: >=20 > > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 06:31 +0300, Anonymous wrote: > >> Robert Noland writes: > >>=20 > >> > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 01:00 +0000, edwin@FreeBSD.org wrote: > >> >> Synopsis: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own = COMMENT > >> >>=20 > >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-x11 > >> >> Responsible-Changed-By: edwin > >> >> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 24 01:00:20 UTC 2009 > >> >> Responsible-Changed-Why:=20 > >> >> Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) > >> > > >> > Why do you want a slave port? That is just going to complicate thin= gs. > >>=20 > >> Things are already complicated enough that distfile for libdrm-2.4.5 > >> doesn't include > >>=20 > >> libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h > >> libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_private.h > >>=20 > >> As airlied explained on #dri-devel I guess it was itentional to force > >> users to only use version from git. > >>=20 > >> > I don't see any reason not to install the various libdrm interfaces > >> > right now. > >>=20 > >> As I understand nouveau interface is not stable. It may go away to a > >> separate branch one day. If that happens I would not need to touch > >> libdrm port, only convert libdrm-nouveau from slave port to a normal o= ne > >> with snapshot as distfile and switch xf86-video-nouveau to statically > >> link with libdrm_nouveau.a. > > > > Lets wait and deal with it when that time comes... I will at least have > > a say in what happens there. Once we have something resembling working > > nouveau drm code it may become more relevant, but I don't want to go > > down this path right now if we don't have to. >=20 > Looks like I misunderstood. Those files are now part of distfile > generating target. So, I don't mind dropping slave port idea. >=20 > How about attached patch? Now that libdrm port was updated to 2.4.5 > xf86-video-nouveau is broken. It needs an update, too. This looks ok, but let me see whats going on with the nouveau folk. Maybe we can just cut a point release since this is fixed in git already. robert. --=20 Robert Noland FreeBSD --=-6JMZJPG0vWaj/p4XyguP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkmm0CkACgkQM4TrQ4qfRONb7QCgg4VY/q5knPAOMDTyQALXETzj XJ4Ani6e/QbSLhKAnwwHkENGksYOxJe7 =fOt1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6JMZJPG0vWaj/p4XyguP--