From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 3 21:18:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72076CE6; Fri, 3 May 2013 21:18:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A7D4156B; Fri, 3 May 2013 21:17:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnMGAHgohFFbsIBc/2dsb2JhbABQgwc3vzN5F3SCHwEBBVYjEAsOBgQJFg8JAwIBAgEnHgYNAQUCAQGIDAjBP44McjMHg1MDmFKQDIMPOoEv Received: from 92.128-176-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.176.128.92]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 03 May 2013 23:16:50 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r43LGnmM019484; Fri, 3 May 2013 23:16:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <51842941.2040905@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 23:16:49 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130408 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Messenger Subject: Re: svn commit: r317227 - head References: <201305031759.r43Hx6vU069291@svn.freebsd.org> <51841656.4060809@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, Emanuel Haupt , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 21:18:00 -0000 On 2013-05-03 22:24, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On 2013-05-03 19:59, Emanuel Haupt wrote: >>> Author: ehaupt >>> Date: Fri May 3 17:59:06 2013 >>> New Revision: 317227 >>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/317227 >>> >>> Log: >>> Add a note about the security/libgcrypt update. >>> >>> Modified: >>> head/UPDATING >>> >>> Modified: head/UPDATING >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- head/UPDATING Fri May 3 17:42:12 2013 (r317226) >>> +++ head/UPDATING Fri May 3 17:59:06 2013 (r317227) >>> @@ -5,6 +5,27 @@ they are unavoidable. >>> You should get into the habit of checking this file for changes each time >>> you update your ports collection, before attempting any port upgrades. >>> >>> +20130503: >>> + AFFECTS: users of security/libgcrypt and any port that depends on it >>> + AUTHOR: ehaupt@FreeBSD.org >>> + >>> + The libgcrypt port has been updated to 1.5.2 and all shared libraries >>> + versions have been bumped. So you need to rebuild all applications that >>> + depend on libgcrypt. Do something like: >> >> This shouldn't have happened. >> >> In the configure.ac for version 1.5.0 it says: >> >>> # LT Version numbers, remember to change them just *before* a release. >>> # (Interfaces removed: CURRENT++, AGE=0, REVISION=0) >>> # (Interfaces added: CURRENT++, AGE++, REVISION=0) >>> # (No interfaces changed: REVISION++) >>> LIBGCRYPT_LT_CURRENT=18 >>> LIBGCRYPT_LT_AGE=7 >>> LIBGCRYPT_LT_REVISION=0 >> >> In 1.5.2 it is: >> >>> # LT Version numbers, remember to change them just *before* a release. >>> # (Interfaces removed: CURRENT++, AGE=0, REVISION=0) >>> # (Interfaces added: CURRENT++, AGE++, REVISION=0) >>> # (No interfaces changed: REVISION++) >>> # NOTE: This is a stable branch, thus you may only bump up REVISION >>> # unless you coordinate with the development branch. >>> # >>> LIBGCRYPT_LT_CURRENT=19 >>> LIBGCRYPT_LT_AGE=8 >>> LIBGCRYPT_LT_REVISION=1 >> >> The library version should be CURRENT - AGE, i.e. 11 in both cases and >> therefore no version bump. > > Add USE_GNOME=ltverhack will fix this bug. > > While I am here, it will be great if someone can move it over to USES > since it's not specific to GNOME. Something like USES=libtool:verhack > libtool:asneededhack or different idea. :-) We have three patches for > libtool: Doesn't every port using libtool need this? And if so is libtool doing something wrong on FreeBSD?