Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 16:51:47 -0400 From: Richard Coleman <rcoleman@criticalmagic.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Retiring static libpam support Message-ID: <42A75A63.7030505@criticalmagic.com> In-Reply-To: <42A75591.7080502@elischer.org> References: <864qc9mgqc.fsf@xps.des.no> <42A73773.1040508@elischer.org> <86ll5ksk44.fsf@xps.des.no> <42A75303.2090203@elischer.org> <42A75591.7080502@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: > Or force us to abandon static linking of apps, > which might be an OK decision, but basically > I think it's kind of the thin edge of the wedge for fully desupporting > all static > binaries. if nothing that does authentication > can be static then there is no such thing any more as a fully static system > and one might as well just not bother. I think that has been the inevitable outcome (fully desupporting static binaries) all along. Richard Coleman rcoleman@criticalmagic.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42A75A63.7030505>