From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 4 18:39:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD1737B401; Mon, 4 Jun 2001 18:39:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from ade by hub.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.22 #1) id 1575ot-000Lip-00; Mon, 04 Jun 2001 20:39:43 -0500 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001 20:39:43 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: David O'Brien Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which ghostscript is "latest"? Message-ID: <20010604203943.C82790@FreeBSD.org> References: <20010604095323.A85414@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010604095323.A85414@dragon.nuxi.com>; from obrien@freebsd.org on Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:53:23AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 09:53:23AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > Neither Ghostscript port has NO_LATEST_LINK set. Thus what one gets from > ``pkg_add -r'' is non-deterministic. Which should be the "latest" one? ghostscript6 -- personally speaking, I believe the others should be nuked from existence with extreme prejudice. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message