From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Aug 23 23:50:02 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA18191
          for bugs-outgoing; Sat, 23 Aug 1997 23:50:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA18185;
          Sat, 23 Aug 1997 23:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 23 Aug 1997 23:50:01 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708240650.XAA18185@hub.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs
Cc: 
From: ac199@hwcn.org
Subject: Re: bin/2489
Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR bin/2489; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: ac199@hwcn.org
To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Cc:  Subject: Re: bin/2489
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 02:40:36 -0400 (EDT)

 [Just for the seek of keeping all information related to this 'pr easily
 accessible...]
 
 >   Description
 >          
 >
 >I sent a bug report with a elaborate "how-to-repeat" section.  But
 >gnats moved that whole section into "audit-trail" for some reason.
 
 Bill Fenner, in a message dated Sun, 19 Jan 1997 20:40:53 PST, on the
 FreeBSD-bugs list, with the subject "Re: bin/2528: fetch(1)'s timeout is
 ridiculously short", blamed this on the ">>" string being at the start of
 some lines.
 
 Mesg. ref, likely to change over time,
 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/search.cgi?words=bin%2F2489&max=250&source=freebsd-bugs&docnum=2
 It contains no other relevent useful information.
 
 gnats is unreliable, anyways.