From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 13 09:34:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B355A29E for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.made4.biz (mail.made4.biz [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:c018::1:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76DB125AC for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2001:1b48:10b:cafe:225:64ff:febe:589f] (helo=viking.yzserv.com) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1WvNsB-0009aA-FF for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:34:11 +0200 Message-ID: <539AC58F.2020704@dumbbell.fr> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 11:34:07 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: trillian r1450 and 10-STABLE, G45 Intel (xorg trunk) References: <1401620646194-5916757.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1401620646194-5916757.post@n5.nabble.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hfjqUTwlBFpGAx4xIIOjOCA1wUTB4ddFx" X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 09:34:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --hfjqUTwlBFpGAx4xIIOjOCA1wUTB4ddFx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01.06.2014 13:04, Jakub Lach wrote: > Apart from that that it now defaults to newer=20 > xorg-server which needs i.a. newer mesa (which doesn't=20 > work on intel iirc), is it planned to work once again? Mesa 9.2+ won't make it to the ports tree before our i915 driver is updated. Recent releases of Mesa are available from the xorg-dev repository so that anyone can test latest versions and we find new problems early. > fwiw graphics/dri failure after syncing with r1450 What version of Mesa are you building? 9.1.7 from trunk, 9.1.7 from experimental, or 10.2.x from experimental? --=20 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron --hfjqUTwlBFpGAx4xIIOjOCA1wUTB4ddFx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTmsWTAAoJEDnpl2Gl/ZTMrMIP/09QnQJ4Oq3b4v7BP/A3ZeaE +eC1mxWdDWwTOASmE2dQlLTI+kM6Ei7+c7hQav3jjsX98llmBOS8K5RcXOJiQXd2 0HAN/FHAqS5XYXurQvv78N690WnzDtgCdPUigBoHlcaZrqmWfiwSdtSARJMeTPd8 DWD4L6DetV1GNDulEFja9nuK9k50Oxq73nVfIU2ozIftN/G0EPlLdxEINcHV3LUE 0sONKMZBJ3f8t8a6JHdmUrn2I0t+Z04TLSnPz4bkJfPK3eilqL8mgiwcbS7mm51i vvTo4B1eaU33yjJ5KpjYWthzranrd1Q0Mv2Q6bMsfAvzwxypDBZyEcQ24xRHofB2 SPGFqgs49UarKYvnxY+CYxOGo9fzHUB6sIpGEg68cfmAiQIG7nieuyiEbGy+St7N taofCrBp4xyvKMifokBMtr4YGGrv1c02cBCulyVu9m8o/Xh5JWNRmnhTJ+zZR0HR 5VFfa1AOXa4hooXCVJIJacARh9061F0oJfZKke7L7W22T4j7w7GZy+2DDFuR1nXB c5emplVR4xDHa1NkNxyYinC4oOE6yyUjkzNPoNHhqMN4CrHwDY7ir2iEt5w90WTh IHuGV7uvGfB8Y9a8A6IoGou6fti3JVZAc7dKXBsZZYPxrK4eeXAirqLKEW65QM3X yrRKRC8AS7pig+wl1R6g =SQ7N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hfjqUTwlBFpGAx4xIIOjOCA1wUTB4ddFx--