Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2019 09:30:56 -0700 From: Matthew Macy <mmacy@freebsd.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: "freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>, freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ZFS vs. TrueOS ZoF benchmarks Message-ID: <CAPrugNoqXaof8AOR2kLJdkOB8w-Q-Wd3d2yk5jXadf8SF2uGcg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <907466e6-1cc1-6977-6d06-20aed1200d4b@quip.cz> References: <907466e6-1cc1-6977-6d06-20aed1200d4b@quip.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
These were run with ZoF compiled with -O0 and INVARIANTS. Take what you read with a grain of salt. On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 09:28 Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > There is a benchmark comparing ZFS in FreeBSD 12 with ZFS in TrueOS > based on ZFSonFreeBSD 9https://zfsonfreebsd.github.io/ZoF/0 > > FreeBSD ZFS vs. TrueOS ZoF vs. DragonFlyBSD HAMMER2 vs. ZFS On Linux > Benchmarks > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=bsd-initial-zof&num=1 > > I am interested if there will be enough testing before replacing the > official FreeBSD code base with ZoF. ZFS in FreeBSD 12 is much faster so > I am afraid if FreeBSD based on ZoF will be as fast as our current > implementation of ZFS. > > Kind regards > Miroslav Lachman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPrugNoqXaof8AOR2kLJdkOB8w-Q-Wd3d2yk5jXadf8SF2uGcg>