Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 00:01:04 +0300 From: Solar Designer <solar@openwall.com> To: Dominic Marks <dom@cus.org.uk> Cc: freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Request for performance measurement of john the ripper on ia64 Message-ID: <20030115210104.GA7052@openwall.com> In-Reply-To: <20030115204525.GA3746@cus.org.uk> References: <20030115054607.GB4457@openwall.com> <JOEOLBOCFFAPLGDIKKCBAEBKCBAA.dominic_marks@btinternet.com> <20030115195445.GA6527@openwall.com> <20030115200902.GA3078@cus.org.uk> <20030115203545.GA6881@openwall.com> <20030115204525.GA3746@cus.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:45:25PM +0000, Dominic Marks wrote:
> On 15/01/2003 23:35, Solar Designer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 08:09:02PM +0000, Dominic Marks wrote:
> > > Good, I was already using the generic target for john on Itanium, I'll
> > > switch this for sparc64 too.
> >
> > I'd appreciate it if you could e-mail me benchmarks ("john -test") for
> > Itanium.
>
> Would anyone like to measure the performance of security/john ?
>
> The port should build fine.
Of course, I'm most interested in the current development versions
(should build with "make generic" too), which should be quite a bit
faster than the 1.6 that's still in FreeBSD ports. Available at:
http://www.openwall.com/john/
Thanks!
--
/sd
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ia64" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030115210104.GA7052>