Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:15:30 +0200 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@FreeBSD.org> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, eivind@FreeBSD.org, David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, andreas@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ghostscript-gpl vs. ghostscript-gnu Message-ID: <20080521171530.GB14415@titan.klemm.apsfilter.org> In-Reply-To: <200804111414.51925.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200804111414.51925.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I'm personally fine by this. But my personal time at the moment doesn't allow me to perform this action. If somebody could take this over, would be great. Best regards Andreas On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 02:14:51PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Whatever the reasons for having two different GS-ports, the apsfilter insists > on the version 7.x (ghostscript-gnu), which, indeed, seems to have a wider > selection of drivers: > > # ./SETUP > Found ghostscript version 8.61 ... > You have to upgrade at least to gs version 6.50! > But you should upgrade to gs 7.00 for full driver support > prior installing printers with SETUP. > Do you you want to continue? [Y/n] > > Yet, some other port (teTeX?) installed ghostscript-gpl and I'm now forced to > replace one with the other to regain the use of printer (Brother-1270, using > the hl1250 driver)... > > Is it time for "USE_GHOSTSCRIPT" knob? > > -mi Andreas /// -- Andreas Klemm - Powered by FreeBSD 6 Need a magic printfilter today ? -> http://www.apsfilter.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080521171530.GB14415>