Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:55:58 -0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
To:        Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Alexander Kabaev <kan@freebsd.org>, threads@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: pthread_cond_timedwait() broken in 9-stable? [possible answer]
Message-ID:  <4F3DB3AE.5000109@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F3DA27A.3090903@freebsd.org>
References:  <4F3C2671.3090808__7697.00510795719$1329343207$gmane$org@freebsd.org>	<4F3D3E2D.9090100@FreeBSD.org>	<4F3D6FDD.9050808@freebsd.org>	<4F3D89CD.9050309@freebsd.org> <4F3DA27A.3090903@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

kern.timecounter.tick: 1
kern.timecounter.choice: TSC-low(1000) i8254(0) HPET(950) 
ACPI-fast(900) dummy(-1000000)
kern.timecounter.hardware: ACPI-fast
kern.timecounter.stepwarnings: 0

switching the machine from TSC_low to ACPI-fast  fixes the problem.

in 8.x it used to default to ACPI
but I used to switch it to "TSC" to get better performance.

I wonder why TSC-low is now bad to use..
maybe the TSCs are not as well sychronised as they were in 8.x?
maybe the pthreads code didn't get the memo about changing timers?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F3DB3AE.5000109>