From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 17:55:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B991065676 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net) Received: from smtp.zeninc.net (smtp.zeninc.net [80.67.176.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DAD8FC19 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:55:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vanhu@zeninc.net) Received: from albator.zen.inc (albator.zen.inc [192.168.1.5]) by smtp.zeninc.net (smtpd) with ESMTP id 399302798B8 for ; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:55:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by albator.zen.inc (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2BD267343B; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:55:01 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:55:01 +0100 From: VANHULLEBUS Yvan To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20081212175500.GA2573@zeninc.net> References: <20081211122828.CF3958FC16@mx1.freebsd.org> <20081211123958.GA5332@zeninc.net> <200812121845.20262.artem@aws-net.org.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200812121845.20262.artem@aws-net.org.ua> User-Agent: All mail clients suck. This one just sucks less. Subject: Re: NAT-T + ipsec integration X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:55:02 -0000 On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 06:45:20PM +0200, Artyom Viklenko wrote: > On Thursday 11 December 2008 14:39:58 VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: [....] > > Actually, you can apply a patch to src/sys and recompile your kernel > > with IPSEC_NAT_T options. > > Patches are available here: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/ > > And what about patches for 6.4-RELEASE? I just not tested on 6.4 (almost all my devices moved to 7.x, and the remaining ones will stay in 6.3 for various reasons), but 6.3 patch should work on 6.4 if it compiles cleanly (I did NOT check every single kernel change between 6.3 and 6.4). If people can test it and see some compile/runtime problems, please report them, I'll try to fix them. Yvan.