Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 16:18:39 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: "David E. Cross" <crossd@cs.rpi.edu> Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@physik.fu-berlin.de>, Carsten Urbach <Carsten.Urbach@physik.fu-berlin.de>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, crossd@cs.rpi.edu Subject: Re: rpc.lockd and true NFS locks? Message-ID: <200012150018.eBF0Id999356@earth.backplane.com> References: <200012142334.SAA70797@cs.rpi.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:I'm not going to take such an action w/o the blessing of -core. :)
:
:--
:David Cross | email: crossd@cs.rpi.edu
:Lab Director | Rm: 308 Lally Hall
In regards to Jordan's message just a moment ago... you know, I *total*
forgot that the BSDI working lockd code was now available. On the
otherhand I know that Dave and a lot of people spent a lot of hard work
on lockd, and also on the kernel-side implementation.
If we were to use the BSDI code the kernel-side implementation would
almost certainly be retained with only minor (if any) modification. But
the experiemental lockd code would be completely replaced.
David, how do you feel about that potentially occuring? Would you like
to make a go of it with the BSDI lockd code on builder?
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200012150018.eBF0Id999356>