Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 09:56:48 +0100 From: Ceri <ceri@techsupport.co.uk> To: Zach Hartley <zhartley@linus.highpoint.edu> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Berkeley packet filter Message-ID: <20011001095648.B1780@cartman.private.techsupport.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20011001010827.A18339@linus.highpoint.edu>; from zhartley@linus.highpoint.edu on Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:08:27AM -0400 References: <20011001010827.A18339@linus.highpoint.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:08:27AM -0400, Zach Hartley said: > I was looking through the GENERIC kernel configuration and noticed that it > enables bpf by default, but warns the user to "be aware of the > administrative consequences of this". So I was wondering, if its something > to be worried about, why is it in GENERIC? Also, do I need it for anything? IIRC, GENERIC warns you to be wary of the consequences of _disabling_ bpf. Ceri -- I probably wouldn't like you. Really. I really probably wouldn't like you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011001095648.B1780>