Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Nov 2000 17:32:00 -0600
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <>
To:        Heredity Choice <stork@QNET.COM>
Subject:   Re: Microsoft Source (fwd)
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <000201c04837$07d4ed90$66c6ddd1@STORK>; from stork@QNET.COM on Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:17:55PM -0800
References:  <> <000201c04837$07d4ed90$66c6ddd1@STORK>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 01:17:55PM -0800, Heredity Choice wrote:
> At least I don't think so, but I once read that WINNT uses the Mach
> microkernel, which has a license very similar to the GPL. Can anybody
> comment?

Windows NT has ever used the Mach kernel.   You probably read some
comparisons between the design of the Windows NT Executive and the Mach
kernel -- the latter because Mach was/is the best-known microkernel

The Windows NT Executive is not a microkernel, but more of a hybrid,
much like Darwin is (although Darwin actually _does_ use Mach code).
Jacques Vidrine / / /

To Unsubscribe: send mail to
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>