Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:21:08 +0000 (GMT)
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
To:        jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Cc:        Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca (Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group), jkh@zippy.osd.bsdi.com (Jordan K. Hubbard), nik@FreeBSD.ORG (Nik Clayton), arch@FreeBSD.ORG, papowell@astart.com
Subject:   Re: was: Bringing LPRng into FreeBSD?
Message-ID:  <200006231721.KAA25921@usr01.primenet.com>
In-Reply-To: <19530.961753945@localhost> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jun 23, 2000 02:52:25 AM

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > He said GNU and Artistic licences.
> >             ^^^
> > I took that to mean no choice.
> 
> No, you have a choice of either one.  You can take LPRng under
> the GPL or you can take it under the Artistic license.  It is
> dual-licensed.  We would, of course, choose the artistic license.

So you would be OK with this, if the purely GPL NLS code (gettext)
was removed from LPRng, right?

I think the GPL-only portions of the code are what he's objecting to,
not the Artistic Licensed code.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200006231721.KAA25921>