Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:13:29 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> To: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Greg Larkin <glarkin@FreeBSD.org>, Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/websh Makefile Message-ID: <4D63EEB9.6070805@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <20110222165453.GH22667@droso.net> References: <201102220418.p1M4Idj6063729@repoman.freebsd.org> <4D63B796.3080406@FreeBSD.org> <20110222154854.GA18003@lonesome.com> <4D63DF94.1080209@FreeBSD.org> <20110222165453.GH22667@droso.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 22.02.2011 11:54, Erwin Lansing wrote:
> Just reinstating it to PORTREVISON+1 should be good enough. There's no
> need to get the, few, people that may have upgraded during the time to
> upgrade again to +2. PKGVERSION needs to be the same or higher, it just
> cannot go down.
Since the package remains exactly the same in this case, it does not
even matter, does it?
Some time later, when/if the PORTREVISION needs to be bumped for real,
it can be bumped to +2 for those (if any), who may have updated during
the between-commits window yesterday. But for the time being both they
and all the rest don't need to do anything...
-mi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D63EEB9.6070805>