Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 11 Dec 2007 23:42:13 -0500
From:      Coleman Kane <cokane@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Max Brazhnikov <makc@issp.ac.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: mingw32-binutils
Message-ID:  <475F66A5.1090805@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <200712120019.54616.makc@issp.ac.ru>
References:  <475EF525.5080001@mcneil.com> <200712120019.54616.makc@issp.ac.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007, Sean McNeil wrote:
>   
>> I was wondering if and when this port will be fixed. It is obvious that
>> there was a faulty archive that was used when creating the distinfo. The
>> following path will resolve the issue and the port build/works just fine:
>>
>>     
>
> there are two open PR already:
> ports/115782
> ports/117807
>
> Could someone commit one of them?
> Please.
>   
I don't think that this port should reference 2.17.50. This archive is
updated regularly as the 2.17 branch is hacked on. You can commit
whatever you want to the distinfo file, but next time they upgrade that
particular archive with the nightly build, it will be wrong once again.

I recommend moving to the latest stable release of version 2.18.

--
Coleman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?475F66A5.1090805>