From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 8 15:07:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F7B1065673 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f49.google.com (mail-gw0-f49.google.com [74.125.83.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63CC28FC13 for ; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:07:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so56377gwb.36 for ; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dI+YPAwyD5DNDPKwPKwsRWDNP7CStTm3BYa1B3fduLA=; b=gvMcLqK+SOnU2PnWBkXl/83Vef+ucqUAmGObTpSZP4WC6c26ApdRDaO19La8k2J31I U18fPq6a5LE3s526LOoCobPPnoXPpv6fO6Xktqa/hOmmbc90oOC4h+83M/nWUhqPU8nE 5GjSZDht30/j1bpKmavMmdNYPMF8Hd1uG21Rg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.173.131 with SMTP id v3mr4972132yhl.112.1315494457727; Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.103.6 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Sep 2011 08:07:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4910491962.20110908185213@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <663133681.20110907193747@serebryakov.spb.ru> <437702009.20110907235248@serebryakov.spb.ru> <426917282.20110908125907@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4610390305.20110908154130@serebryakov.spb.ru> <1705262661.20110908180850@serebryakov.spb.ru> <458771414.20110908183656@serebryakov.spb.ru> <4910491962.20110908185213@serebryakov.spb.ru> Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 23:07:37 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ct0xoNTsOK_ry2vooYxFWiVaE-Q Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Lev Serebryakov Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AP performance (again): txpower regulation X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 15:07:38 -0000 Right, but please keep in mind that stronger TX power doesn't make the signal "magically" more reliable and higher throughput. Sure it can help, but if your problem is interference, you're not going to win by just buying a more powerful NIC. Have you compiled up athstats and have it available on your AP? What's it say when you run it? Adrian