Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:37:18 -0500 From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com> To: Chris <chrcoluk@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbufs on 5.3-STABLE possible bug Message-ID: <20050201153718.GA43352@technokratis.com> In-Reply-To: <3aaaa3a05020105184b175d4b@mail.gmail.com> References: <3aaaa3a0501060612502ce616@mail.gmail.com> <20050106223854.GA97444@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a0501081243395726d2@mail.gmail.com> <20050121175219.GA9829@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a050121124314b6d041@mail.gmail.com> <20050201031509.GA32624@technokratis.com> <3aaaa3a05020105184b175d4b@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:18:38PM +0000, Chris wrote: > Sorry, yes have tried it, I am still seeing a negative perofrmance > difference with the setting on 0 but the gap is greatly reduced and > its something that is a lot more acceptable, at most it has been 10% > worse then if left on auto or set to a value. Let me know if there is > any specific types of tests you want doing. > > Chris I'm not sure I understand. Setting it to zero _means_ "auto." I'll likely commit the patch. Thanks. -- Bosko Milekic bmilekic@technokratis.com bmilekic@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050201153718.GA43352>