Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:57:40 +0000 (UTC) From: <laszlo.danielisz@yahoo.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Nagy_L=C3=A1szl=C3=B3_Zsolt?= <gandalf@shopzeus.com>, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: c-icap exists without notice Message-ID: <794632038.1462836.1458399460917.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <56EAD246.7090009@shopzeus.com> References: <56EAD246.7090009@shopzeus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Zsolt, It might be silly but have you tried running it with strace? Laci=20 On Thursday, March 17, 2016 12:00 PM, Nagy L=C3=A1szl=C3=B3 Zsolt <gand= alf@shopzeus.com> wrote: =20 I have installed the c-icap server port and squidclamav. When I try to start it in foreground+debug mode, the following happens: # /usr/local/bin/c-icap -f /usr/local/etc/c-icap/c-icap.conf -D The acl spec all does not exists! squidclamav.c(183) squidclamav_init_service: DEBUG Going to initialize squidclamav LOG Reading configuration from /usr/local/etc/c-icap//squidclamav.conf LOG Reading directive maxsize with value 5000000 LOG Reading directive clamd_local with value /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock LOG Reading directive timeout with value 1 LOG Reading directive logredir with value 0 LOG Reading directive dnslookup with value 1 LOG Reading directive safebrowsing with value 0 Warning, alias is the same as service_name, not adding # In other words: it reads all config files. Apparently there are no errors (only LOG lines and a single WARNING). Then the program exits without any explanation and I get back the shell prompt. I think it should work as a service but it does not. If I try to start it from an rc script then the same happens: # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap start Starting c_icap. # /usr/local/etc/rc.d/c-icap status c_icap is not running. There is nothing in the system log. There seems to be no "error" except that it does not start. Without getting any error message, I find it very hard to figure this out. Environment: FreeBSD 10.2-RELEASE c-icap-0.3.5_2,2 squidclamav-6.13 Thanks. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Mar 19 15:19:54 2016 Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD0AD5B95 for <freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B7E76C for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3668933C27; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:19:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4344039822; Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:19:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Anton Sayetsky <vsasjason@gmail.com> Cc: Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>, Timothy Macintyre <tmacintyre@outlook.com>, "freebsd-questions\@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0 16kb Page Size References: <VI1PR05MB1343B48CB99607A90FB15C09DA8C0@VI1PR05MB1343.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20160319132752.932a5a1e.freebsd@edvax.de> <CAA2O=b_3Yrd3fydDrw-H6AY7UHh-6=T0Pvuig9D2Gs7VUV9tMg@mail.gmail.com> <20160319134549.5bf3019f.freebsd@edvax.de> <CAA2O=b-JG6V+DMYPq0pQXWhBniDqNzWc1mD9VohpjgndwWD-PQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 11:19:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <CAA2O=b-JG6V+DMYPq0pQXWhBniDqNzWc1mD9VohpjgndwWD-PQ@mail.gmail.com> (Anton Sayetsky's message of "Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:49:02 +0200") Message-ID: <444mc2lckz.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/> List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe> X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2016 15:19:54 -0000 Anton Sayetsky <vsasjason@gmail.com> writes: > 2016-03-19 14:45 GMT+02:00 Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>: >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 14:37:14 +0200, Anton Sayetsky wrote: >>> 2016-03-19 14:27 GMT+02:00 Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>: >>> > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 11:11:17 +0000, Timothy Macintyre wrote: >>> >> I'm trying to do some testing on FreeBSD 9.0 with the page size >>> >> set to 16kb on amd64 but I'm having trouble building a stable kernel. >>> >> >>> >> I've changed the PAGE_SHIFT to 14 under param.h and also updated >>> >> pmap.h/c with the following values so it doesn't complain about >>> >> invalid struct sizes at compile but I'm getting a crash after >>> >> install and reboot. Is there something I'm missing here? >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> #define _NPCM 12 >>> >> #define _NPCPV 677 >>> > >>> > You should probably repeat that experiment with a currently >>> > supported code base. FreeBSD 9.0 is already EOL. The best >>> > idea would be to use the FreeBSD 10.2 release (amd64) and >>> > make the required changes. >>> > >>> > In case you have a valid reason not to use FreeBSD 10, but >>> > instead need to keep FreeBSD 9, try the most current release, >>> > which is FreeBSD 9.3. Remember: it's a legacy release, not a >>> > production release. >>> You're wrong. I've just checked official FreeBSD site: >>> >LATEST RELEASES >>> >Production: 10.2, 10.1, 9.3 >> >> Hmmm... are we looking at different pages? > Doh, it's true. According to main page, you're wrong. According to > releases page, you're right. %) > But in fact I agree that one should not use 9.x at all. As far as I can see, the pages don't disagree, and you (Anton) and Polytropon are also saying the same thing. 9.0 is past end-of-life, 9.3 is supported, 10.2 is recommended for new installs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?794632038.1462836.1458399460917.JavaMail.yahoo>