From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 12:26:54 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EAC8106568B for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:26:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smallhand@crawblog.com) Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F31688FC19 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smallhand@crawblog.com) Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so2181885wfg.7 for ; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:26:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.125.9 with SMTP id x9mr5430632wfc.89.1217939213619; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:26:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.194.9 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 05:26:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <919383240808050526n2a80da53w281d2c607dc1734a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:26:53 -0500 From: "Edward Ruggeri" To: "Slick Bo" In-Reply-To: <329482.19217.qm@web59816.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <329482.19217.qm@web59816.mail.ac4.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sorry - plaintext this time - Disk geometry and two OSes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 12:26:54 -0000 On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Slick Bo wrote: > I've > seen a few people on this mailing list say that disk geometry really > doesn't matter that much, and the OS usually works fine despite > apparent errors. But I'd prefer to be able to keep my windows installation. > If I let sysinstall change the disk geometry, will it create problems > for the files on "0" and the WinXP installation? If so, do you know of > an alternate way to find the disk geometry, and should I directly give > these results to sysinstall? Will that fix my problem? This is something I've wondered about, but blithely ignored. What does the warning really mean? Why doesn't it matter? -- Ned Ruggeri