Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Oct 1997 23:56:46 -0500 (CDT)
From:      Nick Thompson <nick@imperial.org>
To:        Kwoody <kwoody@citytel.net>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: help
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.971006235629.3009A-100000@imperial.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.971006204033.4029A-100000@mybsd.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
i got it figured out.. i had to run natd along with it and now it runs
just fine... thanks for the help.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Nick Thompson                         Systems Administrator, Imperial.org -
- nick@imperial.org                                      admin@imperial.org -
- http://nick.imperial.org                          http://www.imperial.org -
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Kwoody wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Nick Thompson wrote:
> 
> > when i do that... it runs fine, but when i try to go out onto the net, it
> > goes to my FreeBSD box instead of the net.. and the default route is set
> > to localhost.. and when i try to change it to what it is supposed to be,
> > it just goes right back.
> 
> I dont know alot about this but what how is your ethernet device 
> configured on your Sparc? Maybe post your netstat output?
> 
> I have ed0 setup as:
> 
> bash# ifconfig ed0
> ed0: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>         inet 192.168.0.2 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255
>         ether 00:c0:f0:0b:8f:9b 
> 
> And the sun as:
> 
> apocalypse# ifconfig le0
> le0: flags=63<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING>
>         inet 192.168.0.3 netmask ffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.0
>         ether 8:0:20:6:99:e9 
> 
> Broadcasts are different, but doesnt seem to make a diff. Anyway as a 
> sysadmin you must know more about this than I. Plus I would imagine your 
> runnning Solaris, which is alot different than the SunOS v4.1 that I run 
> and is partially broken. (a few libs missing...have not re-installed the 
> OS since I got these machines.) Acuutally suprised that this sun even 
> runs as it is...try to run vi:
> 
> apocalypse# vi
> ld.so: libc.so.1: not found
> 
> Not good, but the machine runs...go figure.
> 
> Anyway from my limited Unix knowledge, a few books and some FAQ's I was 
> able to add this sun to my network and make things go....ummm...also I 
> diddled with my hosts and networks file. What do they say?
> 
> Anyway dont know if this helped, probably not so I'll just stop here and 
> try not to make it worse. :)
> 
> kwoody@citytel.net
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.971006235629.3009A-100000>