From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 6 17:27:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0371577F; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:27:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ji@research.att.com) Received: from amontillado.research.att.com (amontillado.research.att.com [135.207.24.32]) by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607E71E004; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:22:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from bual.research.att.com (bual.research.att.com [135.207.24.19]) by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA28006; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:22:32 -0500 (EST) From: John Ioannidis Received: (from ji@localhost) by bual.research.att.com (8.7.5/8.7) id UAA06973; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:22:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 20:22:00 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200001070122.UAA06973@bual.research.att.com> To: dylanal@earthlink.net, ji@research.att.com Subject: Re: Help, I'm stuck! Weird network/routing question. Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > John, you say that you can't have a shorter subnet mask? As it is > you've specified all of the bits to be the subnetid, thus leaving The addresses were picked as examples, of course. /ji To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message