Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:39:11 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com>
To:        marco.broeder@gmx.eu
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: License Framework: Develop Best Practices
Message-ID:  <AANLkTikddG7UR8bpt4uIEL3ydCmHdA6dJYrNzknP3OOM@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201006152229.56351.marco.broeder@gmx.eu>
References:  <201006150247.20325.marco.broeder@gmx.eu> <6335CF3A-9845-48A6-B7E7-AB8252C123B1@mac.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1006150613290.22303@tiktik.epipe.com> <201006152229.56351.marco.broeder@gmx.eu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Marco Br=F6der <marco.broeder@gmx.eu> wrot=
e:
> On Tue June 15 2010 09:10:49 Janne Snabb wrote:
>> As a previous poster pointed out, I also think that the different
>> BSD licences should be separated.
>
> Yes, they really are different licenses.

The BSD license has evolved over time. Compare the 4-clause license to
the 3-clause license and the 2-clause license.

> Who else should it know better than the FreeBSD Project (and NetBSD, Open=
BSD,
> DragonflyBSD, ...)? ;-)

-Garrett



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikddG7UR8bpt4uIEL3ydCmHdA6dJYrNzknP3OOM>