From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 11:36:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065921488F89 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 11:36:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anders@jensenwaud.com) Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C67E991F12 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 11:36:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anders@jensenwaud.com) Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id 64so8787738pfr.9 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 03:36:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jensenwaud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :to; bh=hvaI/u+orAJQGXp5kKDcD1Efx9Jj+1C8qcOVHRZuHaw=; b=gkOe7NkuSQo6bbI69VvDdV/RqBAyoW7fqAr5SQSpngcVVkiSPGfRH22TmD3fOWVEnu oGZZfqyRt+rCib0c0NiZ2dewtRlZM9JLjDqhJk9FQ3ZIF+40OrnePK6kM7f3HqMpGhdJ wVLQw+8J0/IQik6RKQwqRg3sRI9HwA8Jd/qB8/2MxZXb7icquwYmYZGB1epiOv6zaazx 2SJxx5O5WplZr5i/RXNBciZom8tMtCNj98fyQyKPAoncNEizkU6sDrTqNLS4NCQsSLDw gVq1AkokjVSkW3IClTHARi1fzUHNMoVn0wZYQQVoqvkRzFwOUYPu+nvljhcrRmSTbAMm f3nQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:to; bh=hvaI/u+orAJQGXp5kKDcD1Efx9Jj+1C8qcOVHRZuHaw=; b=JA2tER1PYnb7DGfJbjVtip/B99IgFRMWuBubpKxvUDeow8/hhRP4t9x/MLk6oyUpmY EtrhjBzaYp0UoZHXOThVh/G6ZMAWd4tkVX5NVvcVjaVzzm1STpXtK0gFGrOWP0eJd7v/ YpqHJNEEXLm+DB2YDh3E9iVHJGI3vfDgElAEv3XyqpG9bIQlrphNcKRQ/08YsEp7SOQG ZZdjAmLjRLpiKr9nRLUt/31mv207jUvj2GTo+285uOqhQICBlohwd/NHf1rjt07NX9fg LHdjcliBnZjQuj9hAWi0GUs/ROhGmf8m5U0pLpVlcMR/z3Ln+sZd5ghcheX3+nE5JGOT 2b5g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukf9KDW8J+LZr0WS5wIB0ro93P/tKerievK+E9zNpW7oTmyZxbXu rksOvgC2lt73WeaTaJLT2/hqN34AwZIJbA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5sOFQu2GugYifdkHwN7Xoc5VppK/YoAtAzaG195njTkpY+0Vbhw071r98qAl8UE+QNXwwHXQ== X-Received: by 2002:a65:520a:: with SMTP id o10mr5151866pgp.276.1547984204277; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 03:36:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.86.181] (220-244-182-21.static.tpgi.com.au. [220.244.182.21]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g15sm42787982pfj.131.2019.01.20.03.36.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Jan 2019 03:36:43 -0800 (PST) From: Anders Jensen-Waud Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:36:40 +1100 Subject: FreeBSD on MS Surface Book Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16C101) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C67E991F12 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=jensenwaud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=gkOe7Nku X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.43 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[jensenwaud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[jensenwaud.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[jensenwaud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[alt1.aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx4.googlemail.com,aspmx2.googlemail.com,aspmx3.googlemail.com,alt2.aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx5.googlemail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[c.2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.75)[-0.754,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.86)[ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.40), asn: 15169(-1.84), country: US(-0.08)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 11:36:47 -0000 Hi there I=E2=80=99m trying to install FreeBSD 12 on MS Surface Book (1st edition). I= t has a Marvell Wireless Card =E2=80=94 under Linux it is called mwifiex: https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/m= wifiex Unfortunately FreeBSD doesn=E2=80=99t recognise the wireless card. It also s= eems to have trouble with recognising the keyboard so I have to plug in a US= B keyboard. Is there any chance to find a fix for the above issues? =E2=80=94 Anders= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 09:49:52 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741F714AC947 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 09:49:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from admin.sibptus.ru (admin.sibptus.ru [IPv6:2001:19f0:5001:21dc::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 746B58E233 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 09:49:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sibptus.ru; s=20181118; h=In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=5BdWmUw4cFosR7j9elhaOhzhG7i6pHjsipv04fSwnHY=; b=KxwZvVA6soBCVvD56FbgN29+en WcOtXNf8/6c8iT2f+To85LvltXqPFYZV9sqoztTnL6ufkyPNjaHFzOVrvMxywtx//pEnKbWa0MYcW dDjrRGVAzge6q/TmSogsR5xxXBjkzqK1M8/u5wJuOo6nUfEwlSChTV70ROSqvdXfgEYM=; Received: from vas by admin.sibptus.ru with local (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1gl9jg-00021f-Aa for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:49:48 +0700 Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:49:48 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The mysterious kern.maxswzone Message-ID: <20190120094948.GA7774@admin.sibptus.ru> References: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> X-PGP-Key: http://www.dreamwidth.org/pubkey?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: Victor Sudakov X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 09:49:52 -0000 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Victor Sudakov wrote: >=20 > I have a small 11.2-RELEASE-p8 i386 system with 512M swap and 256M RAM: >=20 > # swapinfo > Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity > /dev/mirror/gm0s1b 524288 29656 494632 6% >=20 > I guess it's not an extraordinary amount of swap for this amount of RAM. >=20 > However, on boot I see the warning: >=20 > warning: total configured swap (131072 pages) exceeds maximum recommended= amount (113792 pages). > warning: increase kern.maxswzone or reduce amount of swap. Anyone? --=20 Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJcREQ8AAoJEA2k8lmbXsY0wEsH/iWJaoyTfWc42ERzU9TIx85Y M3/zdGQSScku+SRBygmC5sB6E3FwoYly1Ga3ta7UUqH1ov+Eg+sjMlkyjKqsrw0j oTJujqx8Xf1GGO4Tqv2iuu7JHFekY7DXef1b1h3H003DD/GohF9mx9Y6hdLRbzYb bJs74iaOeHPbWF60EsQ58daWBvvpxrQE9X8xHHE8SbiAqnSv3blhaR8r0QzDQGAn WZgpW9I+atvh0CJeZ9V0PWZ0Rq+zloHU/GBx4pL7ZP5hf8yUJtRd5gFfzxYbd3Fl McSodcIrM92ypDnQV2Z8GoET9Fp16mJqZg2cK1tN2HlRUA3U74iCLibxjwX4LUY= =Mztn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 16:29:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E3A14990EB for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:29:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from dismail.de (dismail.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:e5e::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29B366E7B0 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:29:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 163bf373 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:28:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (10.240.26.12 [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 40a2dd92 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:28:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1b7b5256 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:28:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 025d2096 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:28:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 11:28:52 -0500 From: To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: fstab Message-ID: <20190120112852.7f086484@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 29B366E7B0 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.59 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RBL_COMPOSITE_RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED_DWL_DNSWL_LOW(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:4f8:c17:e5e::2/128]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.dismail.de]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.e.5.e.0.7.1.c.0.8.f.4.0.1.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.903,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.98)[ipnet: 2a01:4f8::/29(-2.52), asn: 24940(-2.35), country: DE(-0.01)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:2a01:4f8::/29, country:DE]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=201701]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(0.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:29:05 -0000 Hi! On my FreeBSD 12.0-Release (amd64) I have in /etc/fstab /dec/ada0p2 which is / ufs and ada0p3 which is swap. Do I need to have also adaop1 which is efi partition and put in something like: /dev/ada0p1 /boot/efi msdos rw, noauto 0 0 or in not important, please? Does FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE use /boot/boot1.efi or loader.efi? Thank you. SK From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 16:21:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5888F1497C4B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:21:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hello@webskill.online) Received: from mail.webskill.online (webskill.online [103.39.133.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CD956E375 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hello@webskill.online) Received: from vaiop8d47dbd68 ([182.75.24.157]) by webskill.online with MailEnable ESMTP; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:58:35 +0530 From: To: Subject: Re:Web Content Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:52:26 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AdSwy9WG6xr7Y0WYS4iEh9sxzhSdOw== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Message-ID: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3CD956E375 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [10.21 / 15.00]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.webskill.online]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[157.24.75.182.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; IP_SCORE(1.22)[ip: (3.33), ipnet: 103.39.133.0/24(1.50), asn: 132779(1.25), country: IN(0.03)]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:132779, ipnet:103.39.133.0/24, country:IN]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_XBL(3.00)[157.24.75.182.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.4]; FAKE_REPLY(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(1.00)[0.998,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[webskill.online]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MANY_INVISIBLE_PARTS(1.00)[10]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,meta] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:21:38 -0000 Hello, I recently sent you an email about Web Content. Let me know if you are interested and we can discuss this further. I look forward to your response. Kind regards, Stella martin _____ From: hello@webskill.online [mailto:hello@webskill.online] Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2019 8:43 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Web Content Hello! I hope things are well. Firstly, I am not an SEO =) I am a content writer working for an Agency. Being a stickler for content I noticed a couple of web content related mistakes on your website that I thought I would bring to your attention. It is on one of the inner pages. I have one of the digital marketers preparing a quick report for you which list the errors. I thought you may find it interesting and probably a core reason why your online visibility is not increasing. Can I send the report to you if you are interested or is there someone else I should send it to? Kind regards, Stella martin From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 17:02:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2102149A5A4 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phascolarctos@protonmail.ch) Received: from mail1.protonmail.ch (mail1.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.protonmail.ch", Issuer "SwissSign Server Silver CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C4926FA7E for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phascolarctos@protonmail.ch) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:01:50 +0000 To: FreeBSD Questions From: Lorenzo Salvadore Reply-To: Lorenzo Salvadore Subject: Re: The mysterious kern.maxswzone Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20190120094948.GA7774@admin.sibptus.ru> References: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> <20190120094948.GA7774@admin.sibptus.ru> Feedback-ID: X6az_D2smWSR8MT5MHqXnWF0upxehDyHia7Id1cbayHNBUkRu3CIeusDsZHiivIIjmaKB1_OofpALrRUYjNz3w==:Ext:ProtonMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5C4926FA7E X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:02:09 -0000 > Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > I have a small 11.2-RELEASE-p8 i386 system with 512M swap and 256M RAM: > > > > swapinfo > > > > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D > > > > Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity > > /dev/mirror/gm0s1b 524288 29656 494632 6% > > I guess it's not an extraordinary amount of swap for this amount of RAM= . > > However, on boot I see the warning: > > warning: total configured swap (131072 pages) exceeds maximum recommend= ed amount (113792 pages). > > warning: increase kern.maxswzone or reduce amount of swap. > > Anyone? I am not an expert on the topic, but since you lack an answer I'll try. What is the problem exactly? You only want to get rid of the warnings or something does not work properly? Assuming you just want to get rid of the warnings try to do as suggested. According to the output of "sysctl -d kern.maxswzone" this variabile regula= tes the maximum memory for swap metadata. In my case it is 0: probably this mea= ns "do not set any maximum", "use as much memory as you need". You might want to set the same value. In any case, I suggest you write us what your v= alue is. This might be related (not sure): https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4029838/determine-page-table-size-for-v= irtual-memory Lorenzo Salvadore. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 17:18:00 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EBD149AE0D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:18:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.maxuel@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it1-x12a.google.com (mail-it1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D222370436 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:17:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from j.maxuel@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id p197so12263517itp.0 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 09:17:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hViJo5gLgzprVNXW2LDgcvro5XHpLpm7HU2j0RPloHA=; b=IxEewHfbzD9usM+escNiI2EM4BRTRDt8RFU5BNhdytvqe9rUntm3PG6i5blGVfGd7s PmOruBwxvXmSOMwytdWCdq3RZ/Zq6t/zrzKje46oH4wS9UGY3yRUSEV5snPvlJcEOBf2 QvMRik4+gYVvVTAOkdZ5krdzB+WWMaxbUF/bJ7uPKQR8OfBefNkMqSNWHQOk7FF607l5 rpChThDPUUkZXq5IB1zsUWFHlAcpCJL9pNMkf70hIkb7tuyk+zCGyyar1bc+PBs3E/Bn TCXXyJMj+IHXQc1Xl//Ft8fNJHIYVLfSqpWmN0THSLFKXp0B4f69Jwfyzm3/t/N6KQ7i QTnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hViJo5gLgzprVNXW2LDgcvro5XHpLpm7HU2j0RPloHA=; b=f/rTW+gCrW1XkOawvfzt0EQXWa/0JcDtZqp4KPmskb+uKd6gQPmXgA1qb8gr8tm86N nirXH14e6WJm48vBACYR1G3WM6zT3Q+y0SzAkkTmNLsfEmLsEGvwR40yk8FowcVDXrCF xYM/zvNSxXgf/V0lFKCVeBSI2L6u1avQHidslnnTKc0ukAOuCw2bWtFemQGUb7zRqSrb 6OhY4U5onxq5uKqddbbz5bDiOQuEI4uudPTvvNYF772etyhbVAPY1SCGmwaYd7u5xir4 k9iPY7DvyuPGMkvH8WQoWpdcfoe7OsWz3VBHLMfinKIuVQ9AVbDwEHwjfkUvjLzp2Nsj umEw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeCyQRaAEzrQtg4KAvoLqLwq7niuuuPIUcOI4mO/PMLaK3TrNO4 h2rLglE5ZGNKe3MibSDqq4lC4tQJJWo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5SlRLiJwlv84nopE4jL7kNs0anR0z2OUEoDgMA3H16hso1UO7fxq23Y/yX8qNm6s3JCOmMRg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:9549:: with SMTP id y67mr15755212jah.4.1548004677642; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 09:17:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from cybaryme (cbl-45-2-195-179.yhz.frontiernetworks.ca. [45.2.195.179]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm3982950ioh.20.2019.01.20.09.17.56 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 20 Jan 2019 09:17:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <0c03c1c4862d36e3083ec47e4313bc1490cb415f.camel@gmail.com> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Installer not recognizing existing partition tables From: Joel Maxuel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 13:17:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1547845260.4093.1.camel@gmail.com> References: <1547790911.2471.3.camel@gmail.com> <20190118121130.81080d2b.freebsd@edvax.de> <1547844935.2361.1.camel@gmail.com> <1547845260.4093.1.camel@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D222370436 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=IxEewHfb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmaxuel@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmaxuel@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.97 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.932,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.53)[ip: (-8.34), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.40), asn: 15169(-1.85), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[a.2.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:18:00 -0000 A bit of delay to the response, but I am replying within FreeBSD as a result. Shortly after the last message, I found the verbose flag for the kernel, to get the extra messages in dmesg: hdacc1: GEOM: new disk ada0 hdaa1: GEOM: new disk ada1 GEOM_PART: partition 4 contains partition 5: start[4] 0 > start[5] 2048, end[5] 117229567 < end[4] 537234767 GEOM_PART: partition 4 contains partition 9: start[4] 0 > start[9] 117231616, end[9] 419311615 < end[4] 537234767 GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada0, BSD) GEOM_PART: partition 4 contains partition 5: start[4] 0 > start[5] 2048, end[5] 78125055 < end[4] 1953525167 GEOM_PART: partition 4 contains partition 11: start[4] 0 > start[11] 117190656, end[11] 128907263 < end[4] 1953525167 GEOM_PART: partition 4 contains partition 12: start[4] 0 > start[12] 128909312, end[12] 695232511 < end[4] 1953525167 GEOM_PART: partition 4 contains partition 13: start[4] 0 > start[13] 695234560, end[13] 1827696639 < end[4] 1953525167 GEOM_PART: partition 4 contains partition 14: start[4] 0 > start[14] 1827698688, end[14] 1945137151 < end[4] 1953525167 GEOM_PART: partition 4 contains partition 15: start[4] 0 > start[15] 1945139200, end[15] 1953523711 < end[4] 1953525167 GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada1, BSD) So it seems obvious to me now that FreeBSD is interpreting the disks as having BSD partition tables (not sure why other than something that may have happened when I tried out NetBSD). gdisk confirmed this - as well as revealing another detail: joel@cybaryme~> sudo gdisk -l /dev/sda GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 1.0.1 Partition table scan: MBR: MBR only BSD: present APM: not present GPT: not present *************************************************************** Found invalid GPT and valid MBR; converting MBR to GPT format in memory. *************************************************************** Disk /dev/sda: 537234768 sectors, 256.2 GiB Logical sector size: 512 bytes Disk identifier (GUID): 1973AB4D-3A33-4E61-AFAB-92EB6B7FFA7A Partition table holds up to 128 entries First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 537234734 Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries Total free space is 117927181 sectors (56.2 GiB) Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name 1 2048 117229567 55.9 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem 5 117231616 419311615 144.0 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem joel@cybaryme~> sudo gdisk -l /dev/sdb GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 1.0.1 Partition table scan: MBR: MBR only BSD: present APM: not present GPT: not present *************************************************************** Found invalid GPT and valid MBR; converting MBR to GPT format in memory. *************************************************************** Disk /dev/sdb: 1953525168 sectors, 931.5 GiB Logical sector size: 512 bytes Disk identifier (GUID): 71B8FB83-C10B-435B-9B34-68088FFF5D99 Partition table holds up to 128 entries First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 1953525134 Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries Total free space is 125840749 sectors (60.0 GiB) Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name 1 2048 78125055 37.3 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem 5 78127104 97656831 9.3 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem 6 97658880 117188607 9.3 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem 7 117190656 128907263 5.6 GiB 8200 Linux swap 8 128909312 695232511 270.0 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem 9 695234560 1827696639 540.0 GiB 8300 Linux filesystem So following the advice I had come across ( https://superuser.com/questions/495672/how-can-i-convert-a-mbr-partition-to-gpt-without-loss-of-data ), I backed up the disks to images, and ran gdisk without the -l switch. Wrote the changes, rebooted. Tried with the HDD first, did not encounter an issue, and `gdisk -l` returned a protective MBR and present GPT. The SSD was a litle trickier as GRUB got borked and the only way to fix (GPT disks want this anyway) is to create a partition (not logical) and flag it for grub boot; install grub to that. Initially that didn't help either, but after turning off mixed mode in the BIOS (was try Legacy, then UEFI - changed to Legacy only) all was good again. I did however notice in the installer that GEOM had a non- spefific hissy fit (errors popped up behind the active dialogs) while the new partitions were set up on the HDD (SSD did not encounter this) - and since then a grub-update notes/warns-of "nested" issues on the HDD. I am not seeing any issue in gdisk nor parted, except the new partitions are one directly after another, aligned merely to the sector (which to me just means a potential performance issue). At this point I have a couple lingering issues: - automount sets up the external media and user can unmount, but the media contents are unreadable by user - "operation not permitted" - the USB hub as part of my monitor will not reconnect when the monitor power cycles - `usbconfig` will hang becuase of this until reboot I will do a little more research on those two before coming back - the first may be in a better state already by defining /media via automount.conf instead of auto_master - shall see after reboot. On Fri, 2019-01-18 at 17:01 -0400, Joel Maxuel wrote: > Oops, I forgot to properly note that I have removed the extra > partitions, and shrunk extended to reveal space for primary > partitions. > So the reply was in the context of no change in the behaviour of the > installer environment. > > Now current parted info: > > Disk /dev/sda: 537234768s > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B > Partition Table: msdos > Disk Flags: > > Number Start End Size Type File > system Flags > 1 2048s 117229567s 117227520s primary ext4 bo > ot > 2 117229568s 419311615s 302082048s extended > 5 117231616s 419311615s 302080000s logical ext4 > > Disk /dev/sdb: 1953525168s > Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B > Partition Table: msdos > Disk Flags: > > Number Start End Size Type File > system Flags > 1 2048s 78125055s 78123008s primary ext4 > 2 78127102s 1827698687s 1749571586s extended > 5 78127104s 97656831s 19529728s logical ext4 > 6 97658880s 117188607s 19529728s logical ext4 > 7 117190656s 128907263s 11716608s logical linux- > swap(v1) > 8 128909312s 695232511s 566323200s logical ext4 > 9 695234560s 1827696639s 1132462080s logical ext2 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 16:51:29 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC6C1499DBE for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:51:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from acupuncture@cgocable.ca) Received: from fvipqcsab01.cogeco.net (smtp5.cogeco.ca [216.221.81.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706E56F2E3 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from acupuncture@cgocable.ca) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2DkDgDGpURc/yhjqY5iHQEBBQEHBQGBZ?= =?us-ascii?q?YEJe4E1IRKDYZUQCQUBgQgIIQSDWoVZkEk4AYRAAoJcIjgSAQMBAQIBAQIBbCi?= =?us-ascii?q?COiKCbwEFMgFWCw0LLlcTCAEBgx6BdQ2sKhoCg2KBRYRfjFh4gQeBOAyCX4VOh?= =?us-ascii?q?RMCkQyRFAcCAoZhizIeijoDh1eceiGBVoQtkHkkgTMBPQGIVAEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2DkDgDGpURc/yhjqY5iHQEBBQEHBQGBZYEJe4E1IRKDYZU?= =?us-ascii?q?QCQUBgQgIIQSDWoVZkEk4AYRAAoJcIjgSAQMBAQIBAQIBbCiCOiKCbwEFMgFWC?= =?us-ascii?q?w0LLlcTCAEBgx6BdQ2sKhoCg2KBRYRfjFh4gQeBOAyCX4VOhRMCkQyRFAcCAoZ?= =?us-ascii?q?hizIeijoDh1eceiGBVoQtkHkkgTMBPQGIVAEB?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,499,1539662400"; d="scan'208";a="104283730" Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([142.169.99.40]) by fvipqcsab01.cogeco.net with ESMTP; 20 Jan 2019 11:50:20 -0500 Subject: Re: The mysterious kern.maxswzone To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> <20190120094948.GA7774@admin.sibptus.ru> From: "Myster.Hide" Message-ID: <2f939fa4-706d-9917-be3a-3d179498b6d4@cgocable.ca> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 11:47:57 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190120094948.GA7774@admin.sibptus.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr-FR X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 706E56F2E3 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.973,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 16:51:30 -0000 Le 20/01/2019 à 04:49, Victor Sudakov a écrit : > Victor Sudakov wrote: >> I have a small 11.2-RELEASE-p8 i386 system with 512M swap and 256M RAM: >> >> # swapinfo >> Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity >> /dev/mirror/gm0s1b 524288 29656 494632 6% >> >> I guess it's not an extraordinary amount of swap for this amount of RAM. >> >> However, on boot I see the warning: >> >> warning: total configured swap (131072 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount (113792 pages). >> warning: increase kern.maxswzone or reduce amount of swap. > Anyone? > > Probably easier to increase kern.maxswzone using sysctl than modifying the size of your swap partition. I had the same problem but since I had a swap file plus a swap partition, I adjusted the size of my swap file (I didn't want to modify the default kern.maxswzone) and that was it. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 21:56:25 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6342B14A8B92 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 21:56:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@smormegpa.no) Received: from mailrelay1-1.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com (mailrelay1-1.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com [46.30.210.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F9DB84C32 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 21:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias@smormegpa.no) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smormegpa.no; s=20140924; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:content-type:references:in-reply-to: date:to:from:subject:message-id:from; bh=P3HydENdefTnD+R9pnWSx9puL46M6eG4PRoGRsDiL3I=; b=LZlR8cARY6MXhpBWB/VdlTP6HQ02Nac+w/ao0LMygyrd5gZvHkb7loY0LftFeNQx0X/Hy/RROV6PF j7j1+cQ0Kddn8aZSwiG7mKfaDWBgyLGfA/RgdyuFlSpOafSKX+mflAqUost8ak0GKHljjaIipff55a BcB7W/40LVKQolZA= X-HalOne-Cookie: 449d03f08597ad33ec452c61303437eb0eaa947a X-HalOne-ID: f5e271fe-1cfb-11e9-b4de-d0431ea8a283 Received: from [192.168.1.25] (unknown [85.165.246.92]) by mailrelay1.pub.mailoutpod1-cph3.one.com (Halon) with ESMTPSA id f5e271fe-1cfb-11e9-b4de-d0431ea8a283; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 21:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: fstab From: Matthias To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:40:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20190120112852.7f086484@dismail.de> References: <20190120112852.7f086484@dismail.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5F9DB84C32 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=smormegpa.no header.s=20140924 header.b=LZlR8cAR X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.96 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[smormegpa.no:s=20140924]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[smormegpa.no]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.99)[0.994,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.74)[0.743,0]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[smormegpa.no:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.pub.mailpod3-cph3.one.com,mx2.pub.mailpod3-cph3.one.com,mx3.pub.mailpod3-cph3.one.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[182.210.30.46.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.96)[0.962,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(1.07)[ipnet: 46.30.208.0/21(3.15), asn: 51468(2.22), country: DK(-0.03)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:51468, ipnet:46.30.208.0/21, country:DK]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 21:56:25 -0000 Am Sonntag, den 20.01.2019, 11:28 -0500 schrieb starikarp--- via freebsd-questions: > Hi! > > On my FreeBSD 12.0-Release (amd64) I have in /etc/fstab /dec/ada0p2 > which is / ufs and ada0p3 which is swap. > Do I need to have also adaop1 which is efi partition and put in > something like: > /dev/ada0p1 /boot/efi msdos rw, noauto 0 0 > or in not important, please? > Does FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE use /boot/boot1.efi or loader.efi? > The filesystem inside the EFI partition is actually never mounted. It's only purpose is to hold a single file that will be processed during the first stage of the booting process in UEFI mode: boot1.efi By UEFI specification, this file is named /EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI by default. See uefi(8). FreeBSD itself has no need for it. Regards Matthias > Thank you. > > SK > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 22:13:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C968E14A959B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x329.google.com (mail-wm1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8449185A3A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x329.google.com with SMTP id p6so9059227wmc.1 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 14:13:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PVdBjO2mdSYgtlL7NwOJWspRBN2fRY6dCTO/aFtmHp0=; b=AHmnkBgCgULvnVlRaCMAHCg9PYivJdng9QcRwbdi5fbSD7E1wf6ITF7Qc1IVf0Qzi5 1XD4QJV8/K7U+6CAYN6q73UgQb9yGNSYdFJve+Q3ZwY669C6M/Anq/K0O8tp0LV8gld/ fEqofV9LRS9yJB86RIF6u10vSKtOWtaovweBU7fQWMVRv20z+yEXtsy8DnLDGQbybyGa bXHp7baMvjIypnF6n0yZsx8ZnrPcrp+b8Jp0A7rZ4K4Jo1fKCa9lAt2bbv0o+PAfu6tP ye2iH/8u/WgDXrTFfTVcUOByza50v5oUv3rTbUEJX2R/GBnUDJSS2qy+v9P38sKcym/W //cA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdXRSWCeZQzVvlFnAH63nCXEw5niSJFNmCa30XR2XkyhpniQNgp NLddJjErYnh1TCB6rC2K+U/5djOga90= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7qrxOq/MKK1jbEDoaSdWRvwPVJoom/le0JnYJiJYoYrlxFpKDjYM5kBlFCkWo5E1RlawxsEQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:c303:: with SMTP id t3mr21340029wmf.94.1548022418038; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 14:13:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([90.211.170.244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b18sm80079080wrw.83.2019.01.20.14.13.36 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 20 Jan 2019 14:13:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:13:35 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The mysterious kern.maxswzone Message-ID: <20190120221335.45174d3b@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> <20190120094948.GA7774@admin.sibptus.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8449185A3A X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.63 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt4.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt2.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com,alt1.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[244.170.211.90.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.64)[ip: (-9.16), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.13), asn: 15169(-1.85), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[9.2.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:13:41 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:01:50 +0000 Lorenzo Salvadore via freebsd-questions wrote: > > Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > > > I have a small 11.2-RELEASE-p8 i386 system with 512M swap and > > > 256M RAM: > > > > > > swapinfo > > > > > > ========= > > > > > > Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity > > > /dev/mirror/gm0s1b 524288 29656 494632 6% > > > I guess it's not an extraordinary amount of swap for this amount > > > of RAM. However, on boot I see the warning: > > > warning: total configured swap (131072 pages) exceeds maximum > > > recommended amount (113792 pages). warning: increase > > > kern.maxswzone or reduce amount of swap. > > > > Anyone? > Assuming you just want to get rid of the warnings try to do as > suggested. According to the output of "sysctl -d kern.maxswzone" this > variabile regulates the maximum memory for swap metadata. In my case > it is 0: probably this means "do not set any maximum", "use as much > memory as you need". 0 means use the calculated default value. If you set kern.maxswzone above the default it's ignored, so there's little reason for setting it. I'm surprised the warning is showing below 2*RAM, it used to allow for 4*RAM. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 19:50:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8664214A309D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: from mail.apsz.com.pl (mail.apsz.com.pl [91.217.18.46]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D5276AFF for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:49:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@chroot.pl) Received: from chroot.pl (89-74-178-152.dynamic.chello.pl [89.74.178.152]) by mail.apsz.com.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3ECE35C81A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:49:50 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.apsz.com.pl; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=chroot.pl header.i=@chroot.pl header.b=P7oaIRwO To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=chroot.pl; s=mail; t=1548013790; bh=yMQo35Pctw601yycgZp02QhnUEE1S6Z/81yAlJ/sVXQ=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=P7oaIRwON3XNpDwOqcdvy7XFee8cPAEGrOhzDE3m56tpoIAIIqMDTpikKXO93zDPX 36PQ7YEFaccDpmAx5njrfW4tS+P95uIMR1vsqPrd2I3J+eTDAsU+vtGNFRY5MKYjHo FrrDDZ8bY0ztR7P4l0uaSmp1w3ASWOIeVLFRF3bs= From: Lukasz Subject: pkg server misconfigured? Message-ID: <37767845-7e62-509d-b948-4dffd667c32e@chroot.pl> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:50:26 +0100 User-Agent: WebMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: pl-PL Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_50,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.apsz.com.pl X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.1 at mail.apsz.com.pl X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Level: ** X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 75D5276AFF X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=chroot.pl header.s=mail header.b=P7oaIRwO; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=chroot.pl; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of FreeBSD@chroot.pl designates 91.217.18.46 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=FreeBSD@chroot.pl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.65 / 15.00]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:91.217.18.46]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[chroot.pl:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[chroot.pl,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.chroot.pl]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[152.178.74.89.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:51426, ipnet:91.217.18.0/23, country:PL]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.994,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[chroot.pl:s=mail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[country: PL(0.03)]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.34)[0.336,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[46.18.217.91.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:50:02 -0000 Hello. Is something wrong with pkg server? root@localhost:/root # pkg update Updating FreeBSD repository catalogue... pkg: https://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:11:amd64/latest/meta.txz: Forbidden repository FreeBSD has no meta file, using default settings pkg: https://pkg.FreeBSD.org/FreeBSD:11:amd64/latest/packagesite.txz: Forbidden Unable to update repository FreeBSD Error updating repositories! URL "https://pkg.FreeBSD.org" in web borwser gives the same result - nginx 403 - forbidden. Regards. Lukasz From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 19:29:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780E214A2436 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:29:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rau-friedel@t-online.de) Received: from mailout07.t-online.de (mailout07.t-online.de [194.25.134.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mailout00.t-online.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B60077606B for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:29:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rau-friedel@t-online.de) Received: from fwd18.aul.t-online.de (fwd18.aul.t-online.de [172.20.26.244]) by mailout07.t-online.de (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D4AA42C8E7A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:20:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.88.21] (XGXbD-Zpghi+l2B6NC-gYM9N-92Y6IbZOZzvncVEPaUxa0R-aHmVY1YtelhOhqrwEL@[169.239.193.193]) by fwd18.t-online.de with (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) esmtp id 1glIdZ-0KeroU0; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:20:05 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: New Order To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org From: "Susan Frank" Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:19:53 +0000 Message-ID: <1glIdZ-0KeroU0@fwd18.t-online.de> X-ID: XGXbD-Zpghi+l2B6NC-gYM9N-92Y6IbZOZzvncVEPaUxa0R-aHmVY1YtelhOhqrwEL X-TOI-MSGID: 9645924e-cd2a-4487-9f64-d3a166e8574b X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B60077606B X-Spamd-Bar: +++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [7.43 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[t-online.de]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx02.t-online.de]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[t-online.de]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3320, ipnet:194.25.0.0/16, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.990,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[83.134.25.194.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[t-online.de]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[83.134.25.194.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; IP_SCORE(0.55)[ipnet: 194.25.0.0/16(2.53), asn: 3320(0.24), country: DE(-0.01)] X-Spam: Yes Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:29:47 -0000 Good day, Please arrange to provide the best offer for below attached Purchase Order The requirement for our green field project in Berghofen,Dortmund. = Kindly get back to us = = 1) Proforma invoice with bank details 2) Delivery date = 3) FOB/CIF Port Regards, kahn Gotze Sales & Services Assistant = = = 1 attachment = = = = PO367459.xls (72K) Preview download From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 20:49:12 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619C414A5C75 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:49:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A502B8134D for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:49:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 68E8C14A5C73; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55F3114A5C72 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:49:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [198.71.6.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600308134C for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [198.71.6.79]) by mail2.nber.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0KKn784040839 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 20 Jan 2019 15:49:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 15:49:07 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Feenberg To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: DNS Flag Day Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, 2019/01/18 15:01:30 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.1.721, bases: 2019/01/20 16:34:00 #9387139 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 600308134C X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=nber.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of feenberg@nber.org designates 198.71.6.79 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=feenberg@nber.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.24 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[country: US(-0.08)]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.27)[0.267,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[smtp.nber.org]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[79.6.71.198.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.4.2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nber.org,none]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26287, ipnet:198.71.6.0/23, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:49:12 -0000 Is DNS Flag Day something that should concern someone using FreeBSD 11.2 for name service? I ran the tester at: https://dnsflagday.net/ and it indicated a need for concern, but the details were unintelligible and there was no suggestion of "what to do". Daniel Feenberg NBER From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 23:01:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1F714AC32A for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@nmrdist.cf) Received: from server.nmrdist.cf (nmrdist.cf [159.89.231.201]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B06588B2C for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from admin@nmrdist.cf) Received: from nmrdist.cf (unknown [185.29.8.20]) (Authenticated sender: admin) by server.nmrdist.cf (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 64496FE874 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 20:59:49 -0200 (-02) Reply-To: info@shellonlines.com From: Shell Petroleum USA To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Shell Thailand USA. Date: 21 Jan 2019 00:58:51 +0200 Message-ID: <20190121005850.24EC8B0CCBEA89F9@nmrdist.cf> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4B06588B2C X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.75 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[info@shellonlines.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: nmrdist.cf]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nmrdist.cf,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.955,0]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.38)[ip: (-9.75), ipnet: 159.89.224.0/20(-4.88), asn: 14061(2.80), country: US(-0.08)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:159.89.224.0/20, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:01:51 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 23:11:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4724A14ACD32 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gal.iecc.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3CE5D897FF for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 23407 invoked from network); 20 Jan 2019 23:11:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=5b6c.5c450026.k1901; bh=rDV9cKdw7WnvUSiSNquG5Ijmo3a1iKhwurv1vhVfiSI=; b=ag1VkZTKtd4oplBiiUhELY4ph4rapLzzFUb5BDktmaVdGU42AedElKHNTLNuxe1XnkomCXbLDH95BV5TLH5jQjxrZgt+1MVdeyqJAONCEUsLlF/wlbZRZd0NzT140rkIJReJkVsJkE25rwyMdqhIgIxlYIc+NBoJDZ8YW+GsdfJT7iXe3XWSPK5S+Hf1o/FMIRoMH3kHdcEeeMfIb8bwUBwzbidqTnnughE/SGpskIM6RCg7tOWcL3BnLHyfp2bN Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 20 Jan 2019 23:11:34 -0000 Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4A948200CF7730; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 18:11:33 -0500 (EST) Date: 20 Jan 2019 18:11:33 -0500 Message-Id: <20190120231134.4A948200CF7730@ary.qy> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: feenberg@nber.org Subject: Re: DNS Flag Day In-Reply-To: Organization: Taughannock Networks X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:11:37 -0000 In article you write: >Is DNS Flag Day something that should concern someone using FreeBSD 11.2 >for name service? If you're running a reasonably recent version of NSD or BIND, like the ones in the packages, you should be fine. -- Regards, John Levine, johnl@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Jan 20 22:10:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFE214A9275 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:10:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from dismail.de (dismail.de [78.46.223.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "dismail.de", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 793C2857CF for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:10:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@dismail.de) Received: from dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1f4e3bc7 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:10:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (10.240.26.12 [10.240.26.12]) by mx1.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a64dc342 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:10:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp2.dismail.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id ac715fc1 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:10:50 +0100 (CET) Received: by dismail.de (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 08d71923 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:10:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 17:10:47 -0500 From: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fstab Message-ID: <20190120171047.259bb9e0@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20190120112852.7f086484@dismail.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 793C2857CF X-Spamd-Bar: ----- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.98 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[dismail.de:s=201701]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; IP_SCORE(-0.91)[ipnet: 78.46.0.0/15(-2.16), asn: 24940(-2.36), country: DE(-0.01)]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:78.46.223.134]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[dismail.de.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx1.dismail.de]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[dismail.de:+]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.960,0]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[dismail.de,reject]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24940, ipnet:78.46.0.0/15, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[134.223.46.78.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:10:54 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:40:09 +0100 Matthias wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 20.01.2019, 11:28 -0500 schrieb starikarp--- via > freebsd-questions: > > Hi! > > > > On my FreeBSD 12.0-Release (amd64) I have in /etc/fstab /dec/ada0p2 > > which is / ufs and ada0p3 which is swap. > > Do I need to have also adaop1 which is efi partition and put in > > something like: > > /dev/ada0p1 /boot/efi msdos rw, noauto 0 0 > > or in not important, please? > > Does FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE use /boot/boot1.efi or loader.efi? > > > The filesystem inside the EFI partition is actually never mounted. > It's only purpose is to hold a single file that will be processed > during the first stage of the booting process in UEFI mode: boot1.efi > By UEFI specification, this file is named /EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI by > default. See uefi(8). > FreeBSD itself has no need for it. > > Regards > Matthias > > > Thank you. > > > > SK Thank you very much. -- by ajtiM ---------------------- FreeBSD 12.0-Release From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 00:40:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7621B14AFEED for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from radel.com (fly.radel.com [70.184.242.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.radel.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 160698C8ED for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) X-CGP-ClamAV-Result: CLEAN X-VirusScanner: Niversoft's CGPClamav Helper v1.19.2 (ClamAV engine v0.99.2) X-ExtFilter: Niversoft's DomainKeys Helper DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; d=radel.com; s=20170108.radel; h=Subject:To:References:From:Cc:Message-ID:Date:User-Agent: MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=B/VCjsq+e4ioF/J79L8h/WcEUFoNQZx/ndmx+uvGN3dK+V3BSQF4jO3x/MQ2tsxktj iW4Mm2ZpdcJ8l9ZxZVYOEhjMmHrdQilFA/TWscZfApwTR47JAMM2VNEQIkuNZwvxyIC4 +igQyX/s9pNccc6lfd1V22ZHqWRRIM9vGIfsF03ABheNIkmqp5b3fhRuY8TXM1Y00t3w QWUY02B383FqyvxsUNqALSnop9uPMX8DUaDuB7eBSSjMUHLRMCYAoHULGEYo3R3DM86K oB7CyoxfwFGjlJcWlA/w98tehgsiPon7purl7j9sE7wPI312uTnBrAPbUdrHOddzxGDn qUXA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=radel.com; s=20170108.radel; t=1548027621; x=1548632421; q=dns/txt; h=Subject:To:References:From:Cc:Message-ID:Date: User-Agent:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type; bh=l/m+/7oxOLG 0ZW1/FILpDykTWzjxmlVFXhDITlzj1/g=; b=dvX9aUOQMkWjJXii/VEZm4vgc+M 0yqKNf9OQjYy5tfW7TiP4L0N7k4Hq+v2w/UcoQUN+BR4F+R4WAR77f9B0aoVuZ3r WUpvtRyR9siR/om6Fg7OW6qf0MtTuHiw8p3zAjL3vK1z1JHdj+6rrxk+qs7Q6EPW M/mkS4fHJy5srDaoL2wz1Trc+2h2Ie91+ggc2bH3ICnNv4tO79cYpgmYksYU26QN 6BzJcu6aFaQ/9ir8tYlnD62EVb7ivkT78vV27MVbOzCIFyCkRBv21pfdpKCfPX5g w+4h2gQ+uS8AJ8k00fNrwtBV2bx8hCrdOITntCIFUNGc00jumai1S9uKdKA== Received: from [2001:470:880a:4389:c067:71fc:7c4d:cf2a] (account jon@radel.com HELO haralson.local) by radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.1.14 _community_) with ESMTPSA id 1848476; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:40:21 +0000 Subject: Re: DNS Flag Day To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Jon Radel Cc: Daniel Feenberg Message-ID: <5522b94d-4529-e10e-db65-20a1c172d46a@radel.com> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 18:40:20 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256; boundary="------------ms040707050306080109050007" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 160698C8ED X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.984,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:40:51 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms040707050306080109050007 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 1/20/19 15:49, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > > Is DNS Flag Day something that should concern someone using FreeBSD 11.= 2 > for name service? I ran the tester at: > > =C2=A0=C2=A0 https://dnsflagday.net/ > > and it indicated a need for concern, but the details were > unintelligible and there was no suggestion of "what to do". Not enough details are provided by you in the above to have a clear answer.=C2=A0 Are you using the FreeBSD 11.2 server as an authoritative server for one or more DNS zones? (You don't give any hint as to whether you are using it for a recursive server, an authoritative server, or both.)=C2=A0 Are there other authoritative servers involved?=C2=A0 Are yo= u running a firewall or firewalls that mess with EDNS packets?=C2=A0 Bottom line appears to be that if you have one or more authoritative servers which don't implement certain aspects of EDNS properly the life of people trying to resolve the contents of your zone will start to degrade more quickly in a bit over a week.=C2=A0 So who runs your authoritative DNS servers? ---------- If the zone you are worried about is nber.org [as an aside, this business of being freaking coy about what domain you're talking about and what the "need for concern" actually is achieves very little other than wasting the time of people attempting to answer your question--you're publishing this stuff to the world in DNS, IT IS NOT A SECRET!], then the test at https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp/ gives the result > > Checking: 'nber.org' as at 2019-01-20T23:12:14Z > > nber.org. @66.251.72.1 > (ns1old.nber.org.):=C2=A0*dns=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0*edns=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0*ed= ns1=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0*edns@512=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0*ednsopt=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0*e= dns1opt=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0*do=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0*ednsflags=3Dtimeout**docooki= e=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0*edns512tcp=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0*optlist=3Dtimeout*=C2=A0 > > nber.org. @198.71.6.1 (ns1.nber.org.): dns=3Dok edns=3Dok edns1=3Dok > edns@512=3Dok ednsopt=3Dok edns1opt=3Dok do=3Dok ednsflags=3Dok > docookie=3Dok,cookie edns512tcp=3Dok optlist=3Dok,expire,cookie,subnet=C2= =A0 > > nber.org. @198.71.6.3 (ns3.nber.org.): dns=3Dok edns=3Dok edns1=3Dok > edns@512=3Dok ednsopt=3Dok edns1opt=3Dok do=3Dok ednsflags=3Dok docooki= e=3Dok > edns512tcp=3Dok optlist=3Dok=C2=A0 > > nber.org. @64.112.178.60 (ns1.basespace.net.): dns=3Dok edns=3Dok edns1= =3Dok > edns@512=3Dok ednsopt=3Dok edns1opt=3Dok do=3Dok ednsflags=3Dok docooki= e=3Dok > edns512tcp=3Dok optlist=3Dok=C2=A0 > > which indicates that there are 4 authoritative DNS servers for nber.org found by that test, 3 of which appear to be fine (all tests are "ok") and 1 of which doesn't answer at all (all tests "timeout").=C2=A0 Digging= a bit further shows that you've got a delegation of 3 nameservers at your parent (that's driven by what you tell your domain registrar): nber.org.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 86400=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 IN= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 NS=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ns1.basespace.net. nber.org.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 86400=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 IN= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 NS=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ns3.nber.org. nber.org.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 86400=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 IN= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 NS=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ns1.nber.org. h9p7u7tr2u91d0v0ljs9l1gidnp90u3h.org. 86400 IN NSEC3 1 1 1 D399EAAB H9PARR669T6U8O1GSG9E1LMITK4DEM0T=C2=A0 NS SOA RRSIG DNSKEY NSEC3PARAM h9p7u7tr2u91d0v0ljs9l1gidnp90u3h.org. 86400 IN RRSIG NSEC3 7 2 86400 20190210232117 20190120222117 45404 org. USaVbdxbrfaLzm+YzPfAvPE1SBUqU7wWBohEn//1h8ieDHy/ss2n35+K ZpHlToowfaC63D+EvQDVjNz1we2DXRLGSFChKNtpfVTBg7vjehznwpml JuxyY3EmRwchgIBs5sfQjJBx3NdqIaSthpEXqTYoFHMlIRX4zJqzMBv8 Gtg=3D 3uqemnrnh81uabs2702d7fq097q7aanc.org. 86400 IN NSEC3 1 1 1 D399EAAB 3UQSUQNPC70J298TT0MJ82F98PLD7MD8=C2=A0 NS DS RRSIG 3uqemnrnh81uabs2702d7fq097q7aanc.org. 86400 IN RRSIG NSEC3 7 2 86400 20190207152537 20190117142537 45404 org. QKUZwTKC1Nz1L8P39RYWHDsdwSNSAQlkIAA3rFTPBM2eYLrDozGj7yxx j4cMjQfjn7IOMsV+vQ/v/UpTU7A5GDATjaOzmcourwqJw0ZvJI7jq294 Tw6vJsyn1DIyH2pOdQDYBx1MijafvgXzeqbc32lfVLdrobj54dZhlCyI fHI=3D ;; Received 629 bytes from 199.19.56.1#53(a0.org.afilias-nst.info) in 186= ms But at least one of the servers for the zone itself lists a greater number of nameservers: nber.org.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 300=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 IN=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 NS=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ns1.nber.org. nber.org.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 300=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 IN=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 NS=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ns3.nber.org. nber.org.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 300=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 IN=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 NS=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ns1.basespace.net. nber.org.=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 300=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 IN=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 NS=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 ns1old.nber.org. ;; Received 205 bytes from 64.112.178.60#53(ns1.basespace.net) in 24 ms one of which is apparently a pretty bad idea, given that it appears to be dead and gone.=C2=A0=C2=A0 Even the name "ns1old" is pretty suggestive= , what? So the solution would be to clean up the zone data and discard the NS record that refers to a server that doesn't exist.=C2=A0 Note that I've n= ot confirmed that the matching A records between the glue records at your parent and the records in the zone itself are consistent, in other words, I'd suggest checking that you've told the registrar the same thing that you've got in your DNS data and that that is the same thing that all servers involved are actually configured as. An alternate view at another test site that tests for a different set of things, but also catches your current issue:=C2=A0 http://dnsviz.net/d/nber.org/dnssec/=C2=A0 That keeps historical records = and shows that you've had this issue for over a year now. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms040707050306080109050007 Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExDzANBglghkgBZQMEAgEFADCABgkqhkiG9w0BBwEAAKCC C9owggXmMIIDzqADAgECAhBqm+E4O/8ra58B1dm4p1JWMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBDAUAMIGFMQsw CQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQHEwdTYWxm b3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDErMCkGA1UEAxMiQ09NT0RPIFJTQSBD ZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTAeFw0xMzAxMTAwMDAwMDBaFw0yODAxMDkyMzU5NTla MIGXMQswCQYDVQQGEwJHQjEbMBkGA1UECBMSR3JlYXRlciBNYW5jaGVzdGVyMRAwDgYDVQQH EwdTYWxmb3JkMRowGAYDVQQKExFDT01PRE8gQ0EgTGltaXRlZDE9MDsGA1UEAxM0Q09NT0RP IFJTQSBDbGllbnQgQXV0aGVudGljYXRpb24gYW5kIFNlY3VyZSBFbWFpbCBDQTCCASIwDQYJ KoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEPADCCAQoCggEBAL6znlesKHZ1QBbHOAOY08YYdiFQ8yV5C0y1oNF9 Olg+nKcxLqf2NHbZhGra0D00SOTq9bus3/mxgUsg/Wh/eXQ0pnp8tZ8XZWAnlyKMpjL+qUBy RjXCA6RQyDMqVaVUkbIr5SU0RDX/kSsKwer3H1pT/HUrBN0X8sKtPTdGX8XAWt/VdMLBrZBl gvnkCos+KQWWCo63OTTqRvaq8aWccm+KOMjTcE6s2mj6RkalweyDI7X+7U5lNo6jzC8RTXtV V4/Vwdax720YpMPJQaDaElmOupyTf1Qib+cpukNJnQmwygjD8m046DQkLnpXNCAGjuJy1F5N ATksUsbfJAr7FLUCAwEAAaOCATwwggE4MB8GA1UdIwQYMBaAFLuvfgI9+qbxPISOre44mOzZ MjLUMB0GA1UdDgQWBBSCr2yM+MX+lmF86B89K3FIXsSLwDAOBgNVHQ8BAf8EBAMCAYYwEgYD VR0TAQH/BAgwBgEB/wIBADARBgNVHSAECjAIMAYGBFUdIAAwTAYDVR0fBEUwQzBBoD+gPYY7 aHR0cDovL2NybC5jb21vZG9jYS5jb20vQ09NT0RPUlNBQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbkF1dGhvcml0 eS5jcmwwcQYIKwYBBQUHAQEEZTBjMDsGCCsGAQUFBzAChi9odHRwOi8vY3J0LmNvbW9kb2Nh LmNvbS9DT01PRE9SU0FBZGRUcnVzdENBLmNydDAkBggrBgEFBQcwAYYYaHR0cDovL29jc3Au Y29tb2RvY2EuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBDAUAA4ICAQB4XLKBKDRPPO5fVs6fl1bsj6JrF/bz 9kkIBtTYLzXN30D+03Hj6OxCDBEaIeNmsBhrJmuubvyE7HtoSmR809AgcYboW+rcTNZ/8u/H v+GTrNI/AhqX2/kiQNxmgUPt/eJPs92Qclj0HnVyy9TnSvGkSDU7I5Px+TbO+88G4zipA2ps ZaWeEykgzClZlPz1FjTCkk77ZXp5cQYYexE6zeeN4/0OqqoAloFrjAF4o50YJafX8mnahjp3 I2Y2mkjhk0xQfhNqbzlLWPoT3m7j7U26u7zg6swjOq8hITYc3/np5tM5aVyu6t99p17bTbY7 +1RTWBviN9YJzK8HxzObXYWBf/L+VGOYNsQDTxAk0Hbvb1j6KjUhg7fO294F29QIhhmiNOr8 4JHoy+fNLpfvYc/Q9EtFOI5ISYgOxLk3nD/whbUe9rmEQXLp8MB933Ij474gwwCPUpwv9mj2 PMnXoc7mbrS22XUSeTwxCTP9bcmUdp4jmIoWfhQm7X9w/Zgddg+JZ/YnIHOwsGsaTUgj7fIv xqith7DoJC91WJ8Lce3CVJqb1XWeKIJ84F7YLXZN0oa7TktYgDdmQVxYkZo1c5noaDKH9Oq9 cbm/vOYRUM1cWcef20Wkyk5S/GFyyPJwG0fR1nRas3DqAf4cXxMiEKcff7PNa4M3RGTqH0pW R8p6EjCCBewwggTUoAMCAQICEHQDryTAYaEsgncP8aGW6o4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwgZcx CzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1Nh bGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1pdGVkMT0wOwYDVQQDEzRDT01PRE8gUlNB IENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBMB4XDTE4MDMwNDAw MDAwMFoXDTIxMDMwMzIzNTk1OVowgfoxCzAJBgNVBAYTAlVTMQ4wDAYDVQQREwUyMjE1MDEL MAkGA1UECBMCVkExFDASBgNVBAcTC1NwcmluZ2ZpZWxkMRowGAYDVQQJExE2OTE3IFJpZGdl d2F5IERyLjEVMBMGA1UEChMMSm9uIFQuIFJhZGVsMTIwMAYDVQQLEylJc3N1ZWQgdGhyb3Vn aCBKb24gVC4gUmFkZWwgRS1QS0kgTWFuYWdlcjEfMB0GA1UECxMWQ29ycG9yYXRlIFNlY3Vy ZSBFbWFpbDESMBAGA1UEAxMJSm9uIFJhZGVsMRwwGgYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFg1qb25AcmFkZWwu Y29tMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAtK/dFQxMTnVPcP1TI09m30v8 rSG/VWSFWfFvu/2jzPkNL+ivx6A4LNUbqw4CS73GIKcbp8IrpNQz2oQV6mTv+KVJzJMf8GjA y8EzZjhc2tAXL+Q57omCTuAc6cw2KDYFL0aNWX4CEe/LqfoBDKpJF7HCrwwus55+tTEkAY8j tRkQRMHf47YQVJjD/4pdC/h+7jjI0oSgh1npT7Q3K47g6IkVzjhiH8LCsCSVYaLzRZfgcl3s 0GLE858PV/84l5d/hUVD0u9J2EdKpf+hnFqZnA3qw9R0xFQIE6yOkUvhALw1zxXaiGj0047a gBE2Bhv2UIlj6Q0zPa5kRYDy9vBI6QIDAQABo4IBzTCCAckwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUgq9sjPjF /pZhfOgfPStxSF7Ei8AwHQYDVR0OBBYEFHS/Ewun4pYC9Lla5kkmj4zo7tKcMA4GA1UdDwEB /wQEAwIFoDAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMEBggrBgEFBQcDAjBG BgNVHSAEPzA9MDsGDCsGAQQBsjEBAgEDBTArMCkGCCsGAQUFBwIBFh1odHRwczovL3NlY3Vy ZS5jb21vZG8ubmV0L0NQUzBaBgNVHR8EUzBRME+gTaBLhklodHRwOi8vY3JsLmNvbW9kb2Nh LmNvbS9DT01PRE9SU0FDbGllbnRBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbmFuZFNlY3VyZUVtYWlsQ0EuY3Js MIGLBggrBgEFBQcBAQR/MH0wVQYIKwYBBQUHMAKGSWh0dHA6Ly9jcnQuY29tb2RvY2EuY29t L0NPTU9ET1JTQUNsaWVudEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uYW5kU2VjdXJlRW1haWxDQS5jcnQwJAYI KwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0dHA6Ly9vY3NwLmNvbW9kb2NhLmNvbTAYBgNVHREEETAPgQ1qb25AcmFk ZWwuY29tMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQBUNLBptNFZRBkOUPOCI9TPM6QauLK6jojtbxZO XWvZfKvq8ukWUZTPtaDS5UjsMhlxLf/Crv8HkiVXSzC36cVQyjNjl1u+u/Sbl/6q/TfQk+aK 5jzDd4onQVzlfE33ymtZJgh+4dMPWKuXjRS0OyMLzv3mYCvFO83l1G9rBiaCEfFJHKgVGY1z 3ZU/gsPCQ2a0xf3908lwl5H3SPB3ZzLWDf41o5zV70HXfsgP862KzxU9t46XBGZ8TRl/5fl+ Xj2KQdpyWlNZUS00/UHznxeFO5+bkNaOg24BjwfBOWi0D47CE+6BRWvtrmgciWxefUuYeeIy Qr58KK8DlBCkVF06MYIENTCCBDECAQEwgawwgZcxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJH cmVhdGVyIE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBD QSBMaW1pdGVkMT0wOwYDVQQDEzRDT01PRE8gUlNBIENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBh bmQgU2VjdXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhB0A68kwGGhLIJ3D/GhluqOMA0GCWCGSAFlAwQCAQUAoIIC WTAYBgkqhkiG9w0BCQMxCwYJKoZIhvcNAQcBMBwGCSqGSIb3DQEJBTEPFw0xOTAxMjAyMzQw MjBaMC8GCSqGSIb3DQEJBDEiBCCggPsK5d1SClGXpVnBB6NGWB0FQh1jaG0aTP75Vz+dLjBs BgkqhkiG9w0BCQ8xXzBdMAsGCWCGSAFlAwQBKjALBglghkgBZQMEAQIwCgYIKoZIhvcNAwcw DgYIKoZIhvcNAwICAgCAMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgFAMAcGBSsOAwIHMA0GCCqGSIb3DQMCAgEo MIG9BgkrBgEEAYI3EAQxga8wgawwgZcxCzAJBgNVBAYTAkdCMRswGQYDVQQIExJHcmVhdGVy IE1hbmNoZXN0ZXIxEDAOBgNVBAcTB1NhbGZvcmQxGjAYBgNVBAoTEUNPTU9ETyBDQSBMaW1p dGVkMT0wOwYDVQQDEzRDT01PRE8gUlNBIENsaWVudCBBdXRoZW50aWNhdGlvbiBhbmQgU2Vj dXJlIEVtYWlsIENBAhB0A68kwGGhLIJ3D/GhluqOMIG/BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBr6CBrDCB lzELMAkGA1UEBhMCR0IxGzAZBgNVBAgTEkdyZWF0ZXIgTWFuY2hlc3RlcjEQMA4GA1UEBxMH U2FsZm9yZDEaMBgGA1UEChMRQ09NT0RPIENBIExpbWl0ZWQxPTA7BgNVBAMTNENPTU9ETyBS U0EgQ2xpZW50IEF1dGhlbnRpY2F0aW9uIGFuZCBTZWN1cmUgRW1haWwgQ0ECEHQDryTAYaEs gncP8aGW6o4wDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEggEAb5yEPvQAulJhZ0byXPRJXLc6QrcEOj/t34J+ mwd0gH9uqTlpJP6QfuvAsDDOjH1/tp/R4FwbrHeW63TCfkv9xtsaRJSV6yJ6aLfOjG27EYyf qGENok67EhD3VmMmAGPby1ruXxCrxCAK7mO83VuG2azFnAkQTMzG8qMY7vgMp7tmAKLetkPR sHhY/DyO2HBsX1nMWFkXYdJTKZ6B4K/8/HGZXEmWUYLj9TbToiwaz/oY/5f8R0bRa1i0RbTl /I1y/O0fabgD/p1Gt+x+vRvRqkaluACpWSeHH7So0GA6zO2w91EdiU9BfysztXgM50UoOBUi WPGmpUM4C+TZwISjMAAAAAAAAA== --------------ms040707050306080109050007-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 03:32:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A48B148D028 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA1A6B3A3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grahamperrin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id a62so9371956wmh.4 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:32:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=XiJUlBsd7zzlOhmaZ/OdmqscYV/dgqGEjyzXKGCjZe0=; b=EY2T4f2DBlw7QVVORLIRzGGmvqQw2Oyj9svN6iK/mDqfylfFCXdGDF3BbDAIY8lReE 7TS/0JwYiHOzMrLxAf81sSINg7CVu4dEVawH4DE9H2Mqc0/4ocpr1CQUfsrLBR5bgJ4w 42qyvyARmc1OR8RsebVw/ECiA3Yh490KoG8gUB1NeKfU1yyWA/8dnZYk0m1ZmX+4Jp08 Um91SJZtOMUvtr6RWBmOxM000RY2AK5AqfufCTZvv3LQ4srys9Y9k3iBVZV1SrTQ5Gfs c9bM5ZT6Rk02VGZvAHlPeRjB+jUr5/6EBJVgjwbnFUL4DoJm3pVRKi3TC9H0bx2FnjVU Vt7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=XiJUlBsd7zzlOhmaZ/OdmqscYV/dgqGEjyzXKGCjZe0=; b=AYrKtCISosJUXrZd0MhEP32JImREXhsEIecyDjhbPEq24Nz5ZP6exedWbGn3Hi9mDy GWWiRaSwYnlCcWYa1NfMqcozbdmNgPiBgKNUbr+ZtBR24Nu13Ffza2GulLN1wzV7GLxs Qe8RmI97sXGi/4l1JV4Utmsw6/gDN/m8IOrmRr9RIlJ13y7wrqwU01WzSlSc35se6uce zVh+nE5f0poeZOBj2TtYiJXlDFBbmtLzP6VK1+7sD8eKDCn3d00wgiLlcDeE0V1JmFbI kQN/Gzosiqn9ZD3fuBUIT0ur8WttqYoiH2KUHkBm/IDEoepvVBTYW3Gmlac1URIUHqKu pw7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfxuoBSyGCFbeH+RuA9D7EQdE98jbHNngRpLlrhiNoy5rqOVKFN 1nOgwDGRPEhmrb2hWq/2ouOT8Nwj X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5yeYp2y+VSZ8Wk0qnFjdSgoT2lG0RkW11trLqc/pKiqztopx2twI3wd3Fuc6AbGsd1XWzkMA== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:2804:: with SMTP id o4mr10235467wmo.150.1548041552575; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:32:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.7] (79-66-139-63.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com. [79.66.139.63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t199sm33806671wmt.1.2019.01.20.19.32.30 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 20 Jan 2019 19:32:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: pkg server misconfigured? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <37767845-7e62-509d-b948-4dffd667c32e@chroot.pl> From: Graham Perrin Message-ID: <3e97dd03-41a8-120d-569f-07d2ef2fbfb9@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:32:30 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <37767845-7e62-509d-b948-4dffd667c32e@chroot.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DA1A6B3A3 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=EY2T4f2D; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of grahamperrin@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::330 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=grahamperrin@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.60 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.966,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.62)[ip: (-9.04), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.13), asn: 15169(-1.85), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:32:36 -0000 does now have its meta.txz but not yet its packagesite.txz Note the timestamp of the All/ directory; changes in progress, I guess, in which case it's probably normal for packagesite.txz to be non-existent (or fobidden). (I had comparable responses, earlier, with pkg update for -CURRENT.) @Lukasz please retry later. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 06:33:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03669149206E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 06:33:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x931.google.com (mail-ua1-x931.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::931]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C036706E5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 06:33:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x931.google.com with SMTP id d21so6564658uap.9 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:33:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/VdoBCASTnVoaHZus8StNtwnNnU88iaXRSuiLckrYAo=; b=PF9frBGz/GGMBOYRxvfe+058/a7vXnDZQWrBar0o2lunvwAkCF2v2JwkimiR2pMun2 YjaRm8JYLkujld52cX8JX6ETjD0QDM+7P4qvUxTXQ1GauvHO6PJim78qTZwYm8dnrpXK E5RykJKjjJGjJE9CFVch9QCtWaps+Jvt4/8CmVvwIQ+B8wNM63Qz5io2LgJdikdJ00iS a/x7ffIdehgTY22UC+Ao6Wq26zgxok2VnlFk/6kfxrrZIDPNLQt6BKd2FmoBfnr7RDnh aM8zrIqhf8TWI/rlLtiOsAOPrs2s2hs596Zo+JU1OjGEKqED9X5AChyvVWof/fypQdER IKWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/VdoBCASTnVoaHZus8StNtwnNnU88iaXRSuiLckrYAo=; b=tSlCeQfQaGYZ5UAB2VY/6sr5W4LQuAWOs+QTmKoVt6PI62Pdlak1OBnFy6wSX8Kndg XlTuZTvRYwDv7J7JvovzaBTbe5dZwOgMIMWNSWOa8KFsSbhDRfWPgrJeSmZeAty2+64+ QsZOpwn4PKwu+PzYtH3413BGHm7I8i67NIUHNt7S8RXvysGL9I8ACjK3XjKvJGjsfcyS yb3nA5RCjs+Gq59kExxy6JmPghmVMm2dabfGaf1P1kATAW3T+GDQ800GcMWHGkKoxn7C DqUu/FdzOIeXjd1Gp3oPxZ/xY7yVmkVSwcmdMNn3ZJ4+kAUDT9q6PLxWGBMe4BWSowIf +M4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfrEzghFHosbL3WPJ3pdXFLSXx+1ECSFlbkJzV4IMI6QRRLim2c RdNyZRb5qOyCtLyxQCnp/FS2iwBrTqAJIUcK/tPCPfOA X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6h2mBBIXlYN80qmwtS2kezpzyKSrTPzZVgF1f2sFy6pD3OgMLvFD14OxZha+Hd80RDxj9hR++IttsYp5Z+hMw= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:234a:: with SMTP id h10mr10708744uao.71.1548052393814; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:33:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Patrick Mahan Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:33:02 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Trying to understand some email issues To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8C036706E5 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PF9frBGz; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of plmahan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::931 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=plmahan@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.84 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[7]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.967,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-0.86)[ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.40), asn: 15169(-1.85), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.9.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 06:33:16 -0000 All, FreeBSD 11.2 Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - Here is an example - Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to=, relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user complaints - 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in reply to MAIL FROM command)) I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, or is this someone attacking me. I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed up. This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at 9.x). I also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here before jumping on the postfix mailing list. Thanks in advance, Patrick From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 07:31:13 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9DA149A1F3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 064A772698 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:31:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id u4so22017059wrp.3 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:31:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tIgXSojLQ+9lsa3i5Z7Yp2+wWmBoV+sVUE7x5gDLExw=; b=excMBrlzA4SUkJXhDxbZflebYutarpobAZ1fkmrQo3dmcZN3seBXU9+S3wR/cwTHpT DaIyxzPvTw0B8rgbVJk8GuwhAYD4X4UQSOdoqG/9/EwUvseJstQiwEfh12T0UBLMSZWV 2qx2TtsCvJqEnYS0xB9iCNdFYZt3FyiVhGoAhje036q2MKPLWY5z1bJpFTLNn09DdlUf 7R+GywXANfacG9gu15AOIWpRaAzdqSw8Fih3iqRu4WTVBx1GLWd4exCw2S+u9CynkNV2 9EB1l89F9KCw/IVp68Zy63czAoAvBnuv0dEFm4UHi7zdvppY/FPWBWT+grUjKf8mx2Ka t0GQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tIgXSojLQ+9lsa3i5Z7Yp2+wWmBoV+sVUE7x5gDLExw=; b=lGCuEpIvtL+m5XAefnmJJZHvCxZb0bktYp4dFueSaZiqrMdSsS37qpi6tR7aRq2d1v uFWTx9fDRXSrzJ/mGPnr+IuU7AS0cvZVyNoRsTxUhrc2zcKClJMT/059VPC9EFidjDWf lQ91ZNieNdY4lq79m6+ga/gFYLN7ZOnnNH3ZTa2i2GEKzua9Qo8cOzxln7KRYfkqQfNI A/Cn6/ae4Vwgct8zWBaczZoJL9J5WUFMtkQhP0URotZX2R0H/4UN5l8UVOsmFRj7aLN1 ZOE2lkFgg+a+xw/Q8BvfRJiCwipTHRNi76dJtr6lpLewPYRJMz/F9PZsp+H6uA67G+16 i/kw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeQzuBN1piEjAmMLXHqLAm2k3iyJlwnjdB7a+JapZDQN9SVZFOw 9F2+rqLCxKl7lNezFDYzlrjNPOXH506ixitCzuY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6YaLKWcVcfTqcfv4pBw/GK4eDoV7jPow9d89RgwO5YOBGx+LrIV0ZnOI6DErCCdS9qN/m8nihJcjJHIMqoXi4= X-Received: by 2002:adf:b783:: with SMTP id s3mr27940580wre.274.1548055869598; Sun, 20 Jan 2019 23:31:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:30:25 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: Patrick Mahan Cc: User Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 064A772698 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=excMBrlz; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of odhiambo@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::42e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=odhiambo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.63 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.974,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.65)[ip: (-9.17), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.14), asn: 15169(-1.85), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:31:13 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 09:35, Patrick Mahan wrote: > All, > > FreeBSD 11.2 > > Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 > > I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - > > Here is an example - > > Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to=, > relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, > delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host > mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] > Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user complaints - > 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in reply > to MAIL FROM command)) > > I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, or > is > this someone attacking me. > Your server's public IP address is 23.24.207.145, right? Yahoo MX is "temporarily" (that is what SMTP Error Code 451 is. Code 550 is "permanently") rejecting mail from your server. This is normal with Yahoo and you need to go to the given URL to understand why and possible ways of mitigating the issue. The thing is that ultimately, after some retries, Yahoo servers may accept the mail. You need to check your Postfix logs for this particular, or other such emails to see if they are originated by your legit users/IPs. > I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for > unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed up. > This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at 9.x). I > also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. > You just need to sit down and read Postfix documentation and understand it's internals, especially the logs. Without a clear understanding of the logs, you should be very worried as a Mail SysAdmin, very worried! :-) I am NOT a Postfix Admin, but I understand some stuff about it. I use Exim as my preferred MTA. > I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. > Not necessary for this case. However, I would advise you to sit easy if you followed a proper howto in setting up your MTA. Just take your time now to read about and understand the logging. > > Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here before > jumping on the postfix mailing list. > > No problem. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 08:02:29 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45085149B82A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:02:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808907443A for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:02:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0L82ESw064013 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:02:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: DNS Flag Day To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5522b94d-4529-e10e-db65-20a1c172d46a@radel.com> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <157de54f-bf15-06ba-d47f-923dce0a716c@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:02:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5522b94d-4529-e10e-db65-20a1c172d46a@radel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 808907443A X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.63 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.25)[ip: (0.73), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(0.36), asn: 30722(0.09), country: IT(0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.958,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.79)[0.789,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it,mx.netfence.it]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.74)[0.744,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:02:29 -0000 On 1/21/19 12:40 AM, Jon Radel wrote: > Not enough details are provided by you in the above to have a clear > answer.  Are you using the FreeBSD 11.2 server as an authoritative > server for one or more DNS zones? Sorry to step in. What about authoritative servers for private zones? I.e. Are those who are serving local.xxxxx.xx to their LAN affected? > If you're running a reasonably recent version of NSD or BIND, like the ones in > the packages, you should be fine. I've read an article that reports BIND 9.13.3 and 9.14.0 are ok, but we start from dns/bind911. Is that fine? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 08:12:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18C9149BE16 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD082749B8 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com with SMTP id t17so12077843vsc.8 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:12:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xdxQo8wdzk+cy23d3Qlf/Eo66B+tKlWo2HBQlTEqh6Y=; b=bGSifNnAxfB70goM0cecED40qOuGeUMEkaD26nNbmB0c/gMr+z0oH19I83DvuI+o4z bS+RrsIwLdZ5I9q2V2hFzN0JUHrGpF+fPNbE2NEMgKdrz2ghHv638aRp4gxj/p5RljRC GifkOXun4EhJUQvryrQUugk/0oGNuKeZBoHUXtTr5TWQHaMyLRSSGI1qyg+xrYYosZWL KNOuIMqIWasCPyMp4ipEKZAoTIqg9Ka0Xb12/BEsfDqrxV6vwotSvricxMhQOSr/VPqM laHqgokKK8d6icrrKVJZ7/Hfg++Ytd2hYeSHk/gsNWpDalp8YF8V4/w00l7LJwi9W1ar 510w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xdxQo8wdzk+cy23d3Qlf/Eo66B+tKlWo2HBQlTEqh6Y=; b=g8hyzUe+KeyXyYsTtXqi43pww+BzPndStLM91vCN/SkS1Pw7EtgGnGzBXOzEU4uH/x hIvmqVE8YZJH/jDK4wdtOZyC3L2njw9yCCu8ZtIYnJ6y3Oqn57syY1dR4oZ7aFQZv2RL kMvnG+CrWrrOJgy6dXtVL3ljyQTWzLiwQtZQqs0kqVjq07hUYTSsuRXWJEjihY7wSgNT gid0WCI6DnYykqfaCnlTL1yBj5vQxgSoUHNVSLum5azedWbPZXpd0S1OT9nf68ileUx6 jDqaq03rCCJOF4+ByExnfVbgiqZxOIy/3SqK3Ev+wMrr3Q09wiLAJ7LtX85sQvofkHrC KqAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeWwwz88dqyZ8KOSwqrOD6pzU0L6playZa4RHoby/A3EjR+Ny3L NzZ6mD9cB/7X+tdWNOtxpdK9w955Gg5wM1sOHKc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN56kMoNL7HzmZAZoN7DuxO/JfOaV2ODcfWGg0E0mi/fhcnlk3gxKhbC4Q1wU0aEhLLQRbkHfYpQIEPoO1GwjWA= X-Received: by 2002:a67:eed8:: with SMTP id o24mr10443831vsp.237.1548058332010; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:12:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Mahan Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:12:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: Odhiambo Washington Cc: User Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BD082749B8 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=bGSifNnA; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of plmahan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=plmahan@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.76 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.975,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[b.2.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.78)[ip: (-9.56), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.40), asn: 15169(-1.85), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:12:14 -0000 Thanks, for the feedback. I have been reading the postfix documentation, though I agree I don't have a good hand on understand its logs. I am fairly certain, no local users are sending to these accounts. Which is why I am confused about these emails from the yahoo mail server. But thanks for the steer. Patrick On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 11:31 PM Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 09:35, Patrick Mahan wrote: > >> All, >> >> FreeBSD 11.2 >> >> Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 >> >> I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - >> >> Here is an example - >> >> Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to=, >> relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, >> delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host >> mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] >> Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user complaints - >> 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in >> reply >> to MAIL FROM command)) >> >> I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, or >> is >> this someone attacking me. >> > > Your server's public IP address is 23.24.207.145, right? > Yahoo MX is "temporarily" (that is what SMTP Error Code 451 is. Code 550 > is "permanently") > rejecting mail from your server. > This is normal with Yahoo and you need to go to the given URL to > understand why and possible > ways of mitigating the issue. > The thing is that ultimately, after some retries, Yahoo servers may accept > the mail. > You need to check your Postfix logs for this particular, or other such > emails to see if they are > originated by your legit users/IPs. > > > >> I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for >> unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed up. >> This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at 9.x). I >> also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. >> > > You just need to sit down and read Postfix documentation and understand > it's internals, > especially the logs. Without a clear understanding of the logs, you should > be very worried > as a Mail SysAdmin, very worried! :-) > I am NOT a Postfix Admin, but I understand some stuff about it. I use Exim > as my preferred MTA. > > >> I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. >> > > Not necessary for this case. > However, I would advise you to sit easy if you followed a proper howto in > setting up your MTA. > Just take your time now to read about and understand the logging. > > >> >> Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here before >> jumping on the postfix mailing list. >> >> No problem. > > > -- > Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 > "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-) > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 08:23:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0801149C311 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:23:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7C8A74FFC for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id f188so9766125wmf.5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:23:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PoJwwIDKT7vm15FiJ2xea4MxLKenK++PR1Zx4GtTlA4=; b=ZAuLUjq8EwhwcgIjIj8HpQhVOdN34xt95cz+UaL4aUaTtmg65J5+2SdCbmdqmtGMky yhLio7K6ZPHbuqLWQirqLmqt15b7lqc4u83qKd6gmgwhDktSxmXTPmCz58TRpkpKdAAk ECpednoeFY4vAUeYUEt7aEvFsHgyQeQzUBu7w3yDh/LN4Bm6BWnqcRtzVXx11vAnYiM0 M2+Gdy5Wh970GyYIcLTTo0610yV7d1CWKQaS4u2tvzBuiWtuVmXSqQXe+xPRlwKEWOeA TMFCZ0Izdsp7A8GxjAMk8LqaNxruvhS7PC2cEln4or6uHejJMZJqPExoScXCnA+rPGCt pQdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PoJwwIDKT7vm15FiJ2xea4MxLKenK++PR1Zx4GtTlA4=; b=JhGgMZq9bc+Rra1lFFS3ElIxKRE9WkihPSenmjkV63WzsLULQHPOpxBPsjX90+E0gV Va50UYhSI6DFLirv0H/4LLG196qrd6iH9MZkCboo08pz6y2WikiKZ8dzoY/N4wuEgkql cjLO99vzW0Og2JGY0jvpuc2zyVX8ahG7bGSnF3/jzqO3HahRyaL4iIAy03amHlr+2i6n EOKvxXJ1jhz/cnma94a75qrwjtafGOP4gzrJNNHsizUInBRj63HbPI5U+ZXgLfA0/C/q UP54dMu8HM7ewtjp8qwd1H66aXEHvS6nkShzT3kKnRf3PtzuOErAz3+vXfdMYu2LXF4Q NDFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukf2CoL7ZyoSenokJA7L0eLmW0wgbmjMGi3mnBH9mvkVxPGRKWQb QYNI0mD95GDAvguthKCUrs87tAeFaG0KkA+DeGw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5yHV1WNUh2uWS0G3RiBZN8d72TJBBLsKf3YBQwchvxX8CxJzAuliQd1ze5QqbxHARVzIdZ0bKEQiuK9hdHWCo= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c24c:: with SMTP id b12mr16528390wmj.29.1548059019302; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 00:23:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:22:56 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: Patrick Mahan Cc: User Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A7C8A74FFC X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=ZAuLUjq8; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of odhiambo@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::32e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=odhiambo@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.60 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.965,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.63)[ip: (-9.08), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.14), asn: 15169(-1.85), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:23:41 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 at 11:12, Patrick Mahan wrote: > Thanks, for the feedback. > > I have been reading the postfix documentation, though I agree I don't have > a good hand on understand its logs. > > I am fairly certain, no local users are sending to these accounts. Which > is why I am confused about these emails from the yahoo mail server. > > But thanks for the steer. > > Patrick > >> You cannot be "fairly certain" when it comes to log files. It is unacceptable! Start with "grep pwascak@aol.com /var/log/maillog". There are two entries related to that address. One entry has the sending IP and the sender address. The other entry has your server IP sending it to the destination server. Do the same for the many others! Please note that you could set your server to be secure, to only relay for the authenticated, but those authenticated users could be using weak passwords (dictionary words) and those can be cracked. Once spammers figure out one such weak password, they will use it to relay through your server. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254 7 3200 0004/+254 7 2274 3223 "Oh, the cruft.", grep ^[^#] :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 08:24:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB17149C353 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5369975030 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0L7u54T063207 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: The mysterious kern.maxswzone To: vas@mpeks.tomsk.su References: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> From: Andrea Venturoli Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <50f1f8d5-7db6-4abb-6beb-c82f17396304@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5369975030 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.13 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.69)[0.693,0]; IP_SCORE(0.24)[ip: (0.70), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(0.35), asn: 30722(0.08), country: IT(0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.90)[0.897,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx.netfence.it]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.41)[0.410,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:24:05 -0000 On 1/16/19 3:20 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Dear Colleagues, > > I have a small 11.2-RELEASE-p8 i386 system with 512M swap and 256M RAM: As other said, "I'm not an expert here", so I'll just add my 2c, hoping it helps. > # swapinfo > Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity > /dev/mirror/gm0s1b 524288 29656 494632 6% > > I guess it's not an extraordinary amount of swap for this amount of RAM. I agree it's not. I usually configure all my machine's swap as RAM x 4: the suggested rule is x2, but I don't want it to become x1 if I add more RAM :) > However, on boot I see the warning: > > warning: total configured swap (131072 pages) exceeds maximum recommended amount (113792 pages). > warning: increase kern.maxswzone or reduce amount of swap. Many of my systems show this warning: in general it's harmless and you can ignore it. Furthermore, in your case the two numbers (131072 and 113792) are very close, so you are already able to use more than 86% of your swap. Bottom line is: you need some small amount of RAM to manage swap. This small amount of RAM is proportional to the amount of swap you want to be able to have. So increasing this value will let you add more swap at the cost of some spare RAM. I would think twice about increasing this, given the small total RAM you have. > # sysctl kern.maxswzone > kern.maxswzone: 36175872 This is strange: on all my boxes (all 11.2/amd64) kern.maxswzone=0. If you did not set this manually (where, I don't know), perhaps this is an i386 vs amd64 thing. > I have some questions: > > 1. Where is this kern.maxswzone tunable documented? Some months ago I looked into this and found no official docs. However, searching the web, some discussions came up which did shed some light: I don't have the link anymore, but I suggest you try and search. > 2. In what units is it measured? What is 36175872, are these bytes? I don't know. I (ignorantly) guess (hope) not: 34.5 MiB does not even come close to your swap size and it would look a bit too much to manage it (but I might be wrong here). > 3. How do I calculate kern.maxswzone to suit my amount of RAM and swap? > > 36175872/113792=317.91 which confuses me even more (division with > remainder?) Can't help you here. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 11:57:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF40614A6105 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amutu@amutu.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDBB853BA for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amutu@amutu.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E76CD14A6104; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FBC14A6103 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:57:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amutu@amutu.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x534.google.com (mail-ed1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CE1F853B9 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amutu@amutu.com) Received: by mail-ed1-x534.google.com with SMTP id h50so16358772ede.5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:57:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=amutu-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kiGOq+wYazzt2rVv0uRRDqmWshN0fV0zfI4AcwcY1Lc=; b=Vs9OfRNtKBa1h8Yp06lHV+6Pkzuc9+MRejuOhx8CZRvc9NT48I/7wcyJqU04tdfDIc G4WRuZnuC0zV6HgtxP9C+ipL89luxP0n7svewrqsj08Ocq4ZaSprAOpuIFAPdRrvRlpQ gc5NWXEKF8mHAhUH8SEBDSn/t+D7puPqYS4fggutNWFhTdM1ko+lCJsLn6lpk3Fkb88x NCfMHzxVBzzvoKgUiN5QNdEaG1RrD6CKSMMz5lmxvMXcqbR3QxQG5PQaFh55McfJOZIO uoNAyd73cVcq04X6ZM5hPoBE/mxYFL3I52/KcRYJIK9z6JhnqJVuMxzOg57GTH3x/kDk 9Yyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=kiGOq+wYazzt2rVv0uRRDqmWshN0fV0zfI4AcwcY1Lc=; b=Jj8AfUFo9y6XSzBVzRf7lTQ8m4kXQ2DSSD3j4lcwNiCrdh6DRsYxoAO4lND/eqVqLC aMJ4q4mNaGzxjb9J/g/NEOs+vpgTyIP9OkfABVlPRAiwiOULz8VgV5kkhzwgAUPxzqa9 V+cJkq/6fbUZoUz/HOna1yRZj/MVd4h47t8dhrqq3agvsboHQpAISz3A2do9C2gFHTge jZgRmmvXP5tsT/LtCdtJxPAiOgDf3lzMmX+tiGi5ryH8IXHRK/tesQOrIvHID44tW2I3 93YpRwDIhxSI4Wqc3GMUM31YzQCPILCnKk84rHRZz1zzcKzNjs9Vk11mhveylPQ2pFXr BkUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukf2JjWuryhgysurntehZ7lrqXkIwP9bgpYjw4eiWX8yfP7iZrEU OluKMxLw3A1kG7PbKDlyuG7e9jMo87o= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7OtXc2OM1tvsSwJZaSemd/Cr0tIRVUvkZnUbFXcMxjMF0RpU7N8m7ibS5hW5LNwDa+r0jCmg== X-Received: by 2002:a50:9dc1:: with SMTP id l1mr26518801edk.272.1548071828128; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (mail-wm1-f50.google.com. [209.85.128.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y53sm9126670edd.84.2019.01.21.03.57.07 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:57:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id y8so10437468wmi.4 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:57:07 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c2a9:: with SMTP id c9mr23001762wmk.44.1548071826955; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 03:57:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Jov Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:56:55 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: how can I mount 12-R .iso file? To: FreeBSD questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8CE1F853B9 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=amutu-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Vs9OfRNt X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[amutu-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[amutu.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-2.64)[ip: (-9.14), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.14), asn: 15169(-1.86), country: US(-0.08)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[amutu-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[alt1.aspmx.l.google.com,alt4.aspmx.l.google.com,alt3.aspmx.l.google.com,alt2.aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx.l.google.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[4.3.5.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.92)[-0.918,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:57:12 -0000 the iso file has report a corrupt GPT table and I can not mount the iso file as usual as cd9660: #:mdconfig ./FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso md1 # gpart show md1 => 3 1743095 md1 GPT (851M) [CORRUPT] 3 29 2 freebsd-boot (15K) 32 48 - free - (24K) 80 1600 1 efi (800K) 1680 1741418 - free - (850M) It seems the 850M contain the cd contain,but how can I get the content? the checksum matches. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 12:02:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF3914A6D3C for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:02:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EE4A85B5E for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [82.113.121.87] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1glYHt-0006Hl-Al for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:02:45 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id x0LC2fgU004282 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:02:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id x0LC2eTg004281 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:02:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:02:40 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mycroft AI on FreeBSD Message-ID: <20190121120240.GA4192@c720-r342378> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL" Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT r342378 (amd64) X-message-flag: Mails containing HTML will not be read! Please send only plain text. User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.121.87 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4EE4A85B5E X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.28 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[guru@unixarea.de]; HAS_XOIP(0.00)[]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.unixarea.de]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.962,0]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[101.4.254.178.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:42730, ipnet:178.254.0.0/19, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[87.121.113.82.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[unixarea.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.51)[ip: (-9.38), ipnet: 178.254.0.0/19(-4.52), asn: 42730(-3.62), country: DE(-0.01)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:02:56 -0000 --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, Over the last few weeks I ported Mycroft AI to FreeBSD. Information about Mycroft and the port is here: https://mycroft.ai/ https://community.mycroft.ai/t/mycroft-on-freebsd/5119/76 A patch against the current Mycroft sources from its git can be found here: http://www.unixarea.de/mycroft-freebsd-patch.txt.gz The FreeBSD system must be bleeding edge (i.e. base and ports as of December Christmas time) with a lot of additional python ports installed, see the patch. matthias --=20 Matthias Apitz, =E2=9C=89 guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ +49-176= -38902045 Public GnuPG key: http://www.unixarea.de/key.pub October, 7 -- The GDR was different: Peace instead of Bundeswehr and wars, = Druschba instead of Nazis, to live instead of to survive. --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEXmn7rBYYViyzy/vBR8z35Hb+nREFAlxFtNgACgkQR8z35Hb+ nRGf5g/8DUkiqM+z4roJCB4BWBDQJfvThHPVA9g39ZXFEriZI9JGuWvQV1kACiKI HdgLwo1KUcqUk4WPOtpe+yLlYBmTALFugijKZugN4dsGNY7mPCq5M9wNawNSPBWk AENIxMbUMlW3wFs74R0dt37d7WzMO1oq5QolFJQbnMGi85xJNNPWpivZY774wAIs 3CnOTAiV+1iBbWLB3+0TeyBx+PED36LzJhUdA6U0tokdKasA6p2LC00UN8ZzJlV0 KUg8ZCuEEhMg8NpkvUo7dz5RGXAYThkW9Qh8eZO+2zstJm+DgYqJOqq3HLonG7n8 +ZAS+sfVjs9/spU9fBEZhOPv/GB7v26MFVwAckckqi+Xwws/TlfSqHygv1IUJpXl iVGZo89eCQx6TEMRwapXJ19W8cOW5bjuahbVSVbUg/2h3V9IdiW4ODpXYigIHTUv cquW9tMxcS3T1pzFHLOcXzf9KVnaKeAxkr1QtnjWdnX8fn2IonOP3qHDR/ZvV9wE p52WuXMFcOsAxH52FVO5d8z4/toy6M0t7tirsV5ASLAdiKtltXsLONeM3kw8wVju qsfqHJYuJayny9gqBshiQAcAVBRHBbG5mgZmIbbzagvv/kXFg+eoVSumz59St5LW 2jdWBU0PV56HI6zyqOQDCJ05Y9aUDQHEvCVr6AMDtlgbQ55RL90= =RDXU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 12:06:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F47B14A7128 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:06:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM04-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-co1nam04olkn082e.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe4d::82e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6153785D71 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:06:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=UW1IAMY301CfmzARWpv8BJiNw/ovGfHp5Xa4eNv7/54=; b=r6sHkMuUTys+f88B5qlqNUYZtSel6PcispFpkWFM299DzBGk3kGf3wmcOiIvXj7BOJdfioPIJv4ycTUnGTtYe9h6Gb/75oVBekqzkinaOb5TB6oHsxAJbRUnGSt6z28g50USPrPTvlw/1G7YZDAm7XMRdWhNVuvaC8O8ePUeqRZG+X5kskS9QH8psQ2L52ErXHw1+c4UKV3sOtyQHQJz4IZHpXS0ovKvfGfBgAzSkR5dcc7E4r/NY86gloq6k6ZgciBUlrHLN86ElvCE2eADqXEwgnrDPFynBoCL3IYl9+VmSCh2+WjcTYDrSrj/xqugQyhhoBuFu5ByzOdnpv++SQ== Received: from SN1NAM04FT007.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.88.58) by SN1NAM04HT088.eop-NAM04.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.88.244) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:06:05 +0000 Received: from CY4PR04MB0488.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.88.54) by SN1NAM04FT007.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.88.140) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:06:05 +0000 Received: from CY4PR04MB0488.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8cb:26ea:cf45:c10d]) by CY4PR04MB0488.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::b8cb:26ea:cf45:c10d%5]) with mapi id 15.20.1537.031; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:06:05 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues Thread-Topic: Trying to understand some email issues Thread-Index: AQHUsYGu9zGue95bZEO0XGWVX4Wi+Q== Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:06:04 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: FreeBSD Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BN6PR22CA0046.namprd22.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:37::32) To CY4PR04MB0488.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:903:b4::9) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:D47D94D481E87A6A18823C78E76E9A9CEC18CDB808F723E750BDCD50BBED87DA; UpperCasedChecksum:BC479147F22E67921C0D3E9D3C6B6746C122C1EFE1118724814C977E5C68976A; SizeAsReceived:8613; Count:66 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [QHwEvb5pI0T7l9y3TO0xYu64WOKkJclHZN//h0pp+XA=] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20190121070559.00001136@outlook.com> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1NAM04HT088; 6:9uQjBrTOhRXSybh9EIZV7kBZkCaywOqdei5MT+X4rlRIbnVwpnlhVLUx2uzTldw9JBtFOvrtAko1PQWihJVbwSnglCbjQTAPPR1IBVtLA7Qb4+aYI/hRM+nr6Jl4t7hnPGg8EbfA3LfKF+9yXRZQ8efhyhMTA3PfP59AYOTqLe38N7tENkrl5ZtOZSUxfGYNoGOOhRMDNH4sGTNwDC/GdsXrE0l5u5YtI4nfxvQjHyLWYuKQHdFcPzyLG/Kg7KXOyd0nEkVbMMLYa1ZsPyHwmXE5fc1rMsERR9nYfkPjRk6klyMjwcU1WFdkcrExRt+SIw0znsgR5McZ48x0p1ZXn9oEupTUZOBUedjI8t2XDzL8Lf2N4NEyJbr4ncvas27hHEYR0ZphP3YaPdNRkBWksVShh2ghJnMF7CdF3X54JRDnzaTBvDmLCTc0pyD8JGBCs61K5QiiTc6x1hGwNFusOA==; 5:UkyVW1Ctdt9V7fVtrmsxg3acZy5AvJYFyLRANoZvvt6Xv/uHS+Caaajj7PfQo1pkEBGiSvfIHO+UW7In5CWx2Z4fSb9bOpDCLN51ZqNmdfEcJ2l2nuPMRayTpGE1C+ypkjKuGw2AEJCZePmLGVwNKdA+PGcAtxQnJx/Th67l7EcGD8PGUCG+C/k+5AXy0II83i0C67dyVl3G70fck9T0kA==; 7:vOL14Dp18NID4rKs1J/V40RfJsRrMZkLNsoZkena+LY2C87ysKOQJ3f8zClIqBZK+Yfj9s6T8gGqLdbi2u40ZHD0QG9Xmd+oEzQGjNJ2c3t1Xc2GGW3mJIhRRhY/A302kxeum6GSrcnRaGER/7+yYg== x-incomingheadercount: 66 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031323274)(2017031324274)(2017031322404)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:SN1NAM04HT088; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN1NAM04HT088: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4566010)(82015058); SRVR:SN1NAM04HT088; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1NAM04HT088; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: ce4I44hr3guGpF1WURQ13+GgCqvi02AITSz/qHjCOolImdPc4BGR8yxopR6SBRSh Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d83d8638-a7be-4269-cfd5-08d67f98d0a4 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Jan 2019 12:06:03.0861 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1NAM04HT088 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6153785D71 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=r6sHkMuU; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 2a01:111:f400:fe4d::82e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.08 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a01:111:f400::/48]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(-0.99)[ipnet: 2a01:111:f000::/36(-2.61), asn: 8075(-2.25), country: US(-0.08)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.928,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:2a01:111:f000::/36, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:06:10 -0000 On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:33:02 -0800, Patrick Mahan stated: >All, > >FreeBSD 11.2 > >Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 > >I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - > >Here is an example - > >Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: >to=3D, >relay=3Dmx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=3D13730, >delays=3D13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=3D4.7.0, status=3Ddeferred (host >mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] >Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user >complaints - 4.16.55.1; see >https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in reply to MAIL >FROM command)) > >I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, >or is this someone attacking me. > >I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for >unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed >up. This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at >9.x). I also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. > >I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. > >Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here >before jumping on the postfix mailing list. > >Thanks in advance, > >Patrick Patrick, you wouldn't see a podiatrist if you were suffering from cancer, you would see an oncologist. The same rational is true here. Your problem deals with "postfix", so your questions should be directed there. There are an extremely knowledgeable group. The author, Wietse Venema, quite often chimes in with answers to user's questions. To join the list, check this out: http://www.postfix.com/lists.html In any case, see these URL's for further info: http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html#mail Better, provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger. --=20 Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 12:10:34 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9397614A73A2 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:10:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7C658601D for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:10:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91DA079F7; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:10:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0386C53604; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:10:19 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4579F53603; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:10:18 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:09:41 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190121.210941.2275299827563542964.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Performance degradation of ZFS? From: Yasuhiro KIMURA X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C7C658601D X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.49)[-0.494,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.utahime.org,mx2.utahime.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.14)[0.139,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.29)[0.294,0]; IP_SCORE(0.18)[ip: (0.40), ipnet: 183.180.0.0/16(0.20), asn: 2519(0.36), country: JP(-0.08)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:10:34 -0000 Hello, Last month I upgraded my home server from 11.2-RELEASE to 12.0-RELEASE. It is ZFS only system. After making full data backup with tar(1) I made clean install of 12.0-RELEASE and restored backuped data. Then there is significant improvement of I/O performance. Is it possible that I/O performance degrade while using ZFS for a long time? And if answer is yes is there any way to recover performance without making full backup and restore? Best Regards. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 12:35:33 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D829D14A81CE for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liedtke@punkt.de) Received: from kagate.punkt.de (kagate.punkt.de [217.29.33.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9A7B86E5D for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:35:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from liedtke@punkt.de) Received: from hugo10.ka.punkt.de (hugo10.ka.punkt.de [217.29.44.10]) by gate2.intern.punkt.de with ESMTP id x0LCIwtA070810; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:18:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.29.44.107] ([217.29.44.107]) by hugo10.ka.punkt.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id x0LCIwFJ068735; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:18:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from liedtke@punkt.de) Subject: Re: Performance degradation of ZFS? To: Yasuhiro KIMURA , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20190121.210941.2275299827563542964.yasu@utahime.org> From: Lars Liedtke Openpgp: id=874309C0D7DAE723E56F50F6DD6D744EC1628062 Autocrypt: addr=liedtke@punkt.de; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mQINBFqZsngBEAC2qgHHKyTYnOxr/giErojNdDHd4x+8snzW0F6cInzagVySiM6+htoBmUsX uIUCrbsdS4jkADo9fIs0DHfmNWs1Fgp5BWlgNIYV3+P6K756YMFlr/Q2p3ddsJ/YZ5rnkWE5 bNMOQgY9Hdl0kPB1leWy0gRyVjbwU0mv6JimA+Y4e43TG8qKGd4n26h6dUirDjjrc4esMUjz cPMobbcStYR79D2llJWdSVeYgg40E5MeExATTC7sNL9RJPcEOKHCYI1Kn85nvJw98iFyMYlh lcSKqUJhpJ20D7U0DOFJKzY/Ox0+nmmcUchspvSGgAeuBV+fvSJYH1yQnCzz+T2uBcO8JVPO aNKuZ25ruN4ILN5b3dhCTS/aR/A35QyGb9N2SR9Hb0o1L7FEu33JDT+kUeH+4sOSbuNFtadF GyfS+eCfpQvw4/Xua4nGwKkKe35ht3eeuQvzFaxNac1lvMIaHRcq93Sh3k9emVCYP7s4MhA1 OR0THAM5VHgfYIg17m1gvKnqFtgA0AmCDBn8PhYFEEUZWQ5dKQCcfylv8RTrv5qK5iiHBNjJ Mo83ZRb/o+OPzq3Rzt7VM0zZL0jdIGJ2Gn3mD2IybHv+TfcdGtF7RE0/TVacv1TdCn8F2L8q nVkTP22rdyqicydS2qUGxFTfoRAaO29fWGrW77HFyycROP4TbQARAQABtB9MYXJzIExpZWR0 a2UgPGxpZWR0a2VAcHVua3QuZGU+iQI9BBMBCAAnBQJambJ4AhsjBQkJZgGABQsJCAcCBhUI CQoLAgQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEN1tdE7BYoBiVX8QALOtAPS1Nf9qOkn4Mox7CfM7QYcu4XTg SSpYrfr3p27k09NG8M3a+70PShZeK57J4occkHPu7oRAFgOcLSZkZ1bN0Ir4D/6+bh2fMh0F lYNgzYmdukn/7IUlD+NkgPafny1MOFOD3RREKVbVrvnMID0gx4tzEJZq7B2VbhJ7Njdh3PFj IzigzJEH9fHKDv2Taz6Q/qN5TwJffTF+awGdueIPEzBS/V0P83g0M+5tfRAsI4nV+Jxwi6gb rp24rTe9cuctFJpRswzrmR+kCHvhzhC6XGZJBvpGTuQQoMunAKV5edlpAsuD2RV1YBEHGZKr rOP2weoZZdvJiU5QP+Re714p5atgg1ANuWEF3X1gU1op37zy3XH/1/Fi6MYiOovai5e/SqjP 7R2hoHBxoA9kHhEe8V5MaVcKE8cxRPzckRoBf11asyBy4QON4QTW4B9bxVeSkTaYZXp14OlF rK00yoOUJa6t3NKET68wDCvpwjNiDc4Sw5Uz1QHsMpcPVfC1nbVILO12bwlGd39qmDWi5wH3 NVgsJ3E09SobCqdrx1F6/pzHbq2I5uTa5kD9AUeIOkURwPK0ipWHvggxZlFf3b33zXwlFRYh JOYJN9zSMA1tvufpzh0ASvHrwjJWTALSUaoX9AHrw/R0PhsKuxX1XG5hsQkCUfKRrQzaJC3v 2jJkuQINBFqZsngBEAC4XuIGjNznjGatJX6HeJKtRXibysYTyvLM3Uql9I22dPLOLvATgpo2 msxRWVmPgfQGyxiurDm0LZVxtC1OLNG/BtKOSXyAZ36N0uin8aF0dB6vwYUNj2tkFfho6WQY kzhcxP3YX65UrbkU7I3ACTHUskQEGGX4M7rBPml89zBeFatEMEh0eLfzzzwecYFSiJM5nxGf SDMAqtkLe0H1aWsc0KuIPP5Y1wUaRWqDMk5qEoj02sY/sL6kMACJKxruDtZq61GAWVq6XpmV 8LyDXCXJgDh+mXuXLFTONt9HbJqMZ4iJjkHFaFoBcXkEAQEN5ZaQbKdFXpPRfu0YacHWfDRi huXr/PAPLrF01dKpu74Qih8QC6xmctbMhAPFq90jUoP2xUJ7/nYj4D8k6tA84ZPjReGmYzWQ mr8HPbUuWbLMsEpCFb+EeHPLGc6ItPw1sRCI6utzxLdpB3HONimjDjLfmvPS/mm5sClu76RM WVxw5uy6dmHiAJpycMUgnyOcAjLrQVlenObpAe5EVQmcazpWkpmuhnEl1bZQpaBftkzs5kKP 30s8dLlraBYyzxYytjUW+47pOWdYYvlF4yjp5cNyegXUQGnKgJH0p+UoMBAFplY3eNxP3mlA KT8oVY9w23+m8ZOsOPAlH1bhOvcsb9lkh1KOIUuUQxkk0NSOs5IpxQARAQABiQIlBBgBCAAP BQJambJ4AhsMBQkJZgGAAAoJEN1tdE7BYoBiZHQP/3q9o8ENdGo4K7daesUmiBuedP05uLDa TXxck+7K1IsX6GpTnUMyiYm7cu/IyrhlkZBe9TaLPaOo0HEN1W7jr8PLxKtbOwQ0dIHOIi60 4DrkqvFQKH1fARaq7YJJS7DRUin5n4/hcIpoSn273kEqby8BZpsL+kB8gtIbTtVpSwJfhobh dxHBi+NlMas7KYZ8aTuNOKJTS27PjQMfeEzf8u6Hb4JSsNYuQoyoSTyBkKksx3UbjXUvESKY I3uyTF7mVXJ0hvhX4QK3XOqwTfkT8NMzc/Xkdm9iaWrap74v9vfG1Vn8KhCRSQkyjbuDuocF PEtcIEJjU1WJmIdK60X03BJUYlH3CRthJOateCZWDTOSzBIZV+JV3cnV2kx9j9+nmnTQ1yQe bpnL7OtxSONH9t+gWHuGaIX5k/Bf2Ea7cSHLm8cvza25aIQRxfqmkBrR48U1lUSZTLULxzO3 OeJacjXWGewZzJl7ecobpgs4MM7yollhKzr+1sq2SMNcVL3s+8WfeZeCorm6GJLUiABHLlr/ ISWVpM730Jc0V9PyPFAsMPQRa24FsZl8goHvp/5khoM4cvNtplh64ny83ieRjCUnQgSdhkW9 fdYhqFgfJNCacLCGxZdGrEs3F5UAtUS2nplIbODUtYQcy3Qdd+rblY8A9UTPAUCxXVLi9K6i Gk7o Message-ID: <102da655-e6c1-ee50-aad5-e3fe55d233de@punkt.de> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:18:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190121.210941.2275299827563542964.yasu@utahime.org> Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B9A7B86E5D X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of liedtke@punkt.de designates 217.29.33.131 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=liedtke@punkt.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.99 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.88)[-0.880,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:217.29.32.0/20]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.89)[-0.894,0]; HAS_ATTACHMENT(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/mixed,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[punkt.de]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mailin.pluspunkthosting.de,mailin.pluspunkthosting.de]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[131.33.29.217.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.01)[-0.007,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16188, ipnet:217.29.32.0/20, country:DE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: DE(-0.01)]; MIME_UNKNOWN(0.10)[application/pgp-keys] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:35:33 -0000 Hey, might your Pool run out of capacity? Note: ZFS performance goes down from about 85% to 90% upwards. Lars  Am 21.01.19 um 13:09 schrieb Yasuhiro KIMURA: > Hello, > > Last month I upgraded my home server from 11.2-RELEASE to > 12.0-RELEASE. It is ZFS only system. After making full data backup > with tar(1) I made clean install of 12.0-RELEASE and restored backuped > data. Then there is significant improvement of I/O performance. > > Is it possible that I/O performance degrade while using ZFS for a long > time? And if answer is yes is there any way to recover performance > without making full backup and restore? > > Best Regards. > > --- > Yasuhiro KIMURA > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- punkt.de GmbH * Kaiserallee 13a * 76133 Karlsruhe Tel. 0721 9109 0 * Fax 0721 9109 100 info@punkt.de https://www.punkt.de Gf: Jürgen Egeling AG Mannheim 108285 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 12:35:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7177D14A81E3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com) Received: from s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com (s1-b0c6.socketlabs.email-od.com [142.0.176.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D54086E6D for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:35:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=email-od.com;i=@email-od.com;s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; t=1548074140; x=1550666140; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-thread-info; bh=43yAbcqIpJedZv3bCZOLsnPsZ/FJ7TzwETsSE4oy6X4=; b=X3MMr6OtGOgGdZfz+FZhi8BgGmqC5N52fNgL3HsQnwT0caRTB4oOeOA2BJl/WK+2d62SBW9NI0lBtpS02+v1mgCQ5k+aqLNgFagw8jHJTNCmS3BNYZ8+P3R6ADUacywg5p8b2F19vcm38qN0ja+ze3jqc9b53QZ1EHcr+3SxOQE= X-Thread-Info: NDI1MC4xMi4xYTMwMDAwMDBlOWZlNzUuZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnM9ZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= Received: from r5.us-west-2a.aws.in.socketlabs.com (r5.us-west-2a.aws.in.socketlabs.com [52.39.5.146]) by mxsg2.email-od.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:35:29 -0500 Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (EMTPY [89.127.62.20]) by r5.us-west-2a.aws.in.socketlabs.com with ESMTP(version=Tls12 cipher=Aes256 bits=256); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:35:27 -0500 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.91 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1glYnU-000HDL-Tn; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:35:24 +0000 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:35:24 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: Yasuhiro KIMURA Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance degradation of ZFS? Message-Id: <20190121123524.3c97bdfb2254e3393a58b831@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20190121.210941.2275299827563542964.yasu@utahime.org> References: <20190121.210941.2275299827563542964.yasu@utahime.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd12.0) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7D54086E6D X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=email-od.com header.s=dkim header.b=X3MMr6Ot; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of 4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com designates 142.0.176.198 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.75 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:142.0.176.0/20]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[email-od.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mxbh.socketlabs.com,mxbsg.socketlabs.com]; FORGED_SENDER(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7381, ipnet:142.0.176.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[steve@sohara.org,4250.10.freebsd-questions=freebsd.org@email-od.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.979,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[email-od.com:s=dkim]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.54)[-0.539,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[sohara.org]; FORGED_SENDER_VERP_SRS(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[198.176.0.142.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.15.0]; ENVFROM_VERP(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.23)[ip: (-0.57), ipnet: 142.0.176.0/22(-0.28), asn: 7381(-0.22), country: US(-0.08)] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:35:41 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:09:41 +0900 (JST) Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Is it possible that I/O performance degrade while using ZFS for a long > time? And if answer is yes is there any way to recover performance > without making full backup and restore? How is the pool configured ? How full is it ? How well is the data striped (are some vdevs fuller than others) ? Are any of the drives showing trouble ? Do you run a regular scrub ? What does zpool status show ? I can think of several ways in which ZFS performance can become degraded (and there are probably a good many I haven't thought of) but time passing is not enough alone, something has to be going astray. Those questions should help pin down what. What it will take to recover depends greatly on the cause, you may find (for example) that replacing a flaky drive (not failing just making too many retries) will bring dramatic improvement or you might be unlucky and have developed hideously imbalanced stripes for which there is no cure but to wipe and rebuild. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 12:47:22 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFBE14A88D1 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD0D687684 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: matthew/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8F8C71F9F3 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:47:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from leaf.local (unknown [88.202.132.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49E7717B36 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/49E7717B36; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: DNS Flag Day To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <5522b94d-4529-e10e-db65-20a1c172d46a@radel.com> <157de54f-bf15-06ba-d47f-923dce0a716c@netfence.it> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:47:16 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <157de54f-bf15-06ba-d47f-923dce0a716c@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CD0D687684 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.97 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[FreeBSD.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.970,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:11403, ipnet:96.47.64.0/20, country:US] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:47:22 -0000 On 21/01/2019 08:02, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Sorry to step in. > What about authoritative servers for private zones? > > I.e. Are those who are serving local.xxxxx.xx to their LAN affected? You can only be affected by your local nameservers not having correct EDNS0 support by upgrading to one of the nameserver packages due to be released on or after that day, which will take a much harder line on incorrect ENDS0-related responses. Since you presumably control both client and server sides of your local setup, then all you need to do is ensure that you upgrade all your clients and server software in a fairly short timeframe, or else leave all well alone. You can grab ISC's ednscomp testing code from GitHub if you want to run it against your private internal nameservers: https://gitlab.isc.org/isc-projects/DNS-Compliance-Testing or you can look at the queries the ednscomp site runs and just run them by hand using dig(1) -- see eg. this page: https://ednscomp.isc.org/compliance/summary.html Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 13:22:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63D914A97C1 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:22:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ED608905F for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:22:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E78D7A1D; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:22:32 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E069553686; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:22:31 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFB0B53685; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:22:30 +0900 (JST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 22:22:15 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190121.222215.1653763436758831663.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance degradation of ZFS? From: Yasuhiro KIMURA In-Reply-To: <102da655-e6c1-ee50-aad5-e3fe55d233de@punkt.de> <20190121123524.3c97bdfb2254e3393a58b831@sohara.org> References: <20190121.210941.2275299827563542964.yasu@utahime.org> <102da655-e6c1-ee50-aad5-e3fe55d233de@punkt.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0ED608905F X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.42 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.08)[-0.084,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx1.utahime.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.38)[0.377,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.77)[0.767,0]; IP_SCORE(0.17)[ip: (0.39), ipnet: 183.180.0.0/16(0.19), asn: 2519(0.36), country: JP(-0.08)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:22:41 -0000 From: Lars Liedtke Subject: Re: Performance degradation of ZFS? Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:18:58 +0100 > might your Pool run out of capacity? Note: ZFS performance goes down > from about 85% to 90% upwards. Though I can't remember exactly, capacity of pool was less than 40% according to the output of 'zpool list zroot'. From: Steve O'Hara-Smith Subject: Re: Performance degradation of ZFS? Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:35:24 +0000 > How is the pool configured ? How full is it ? How well is the data > striped (are some vdevs fuller than others) ? Are any of the drives showing > trouble ? Do you run a regular scrub ? What does zpool status show ? I created old pool by using installer of 11.0-RELEASE with automatic ZFS configuration. It used only 1 HDD and therefore wasn't striped at all. AFAIK the drive didn't show any trouble. As for scrub I used daily periodic jobs by setting 'daily_scrub_zfs_enable="YES"'. So pool was scrubed every 35 days. And as far as I remember there was no case that 'zpool status' showed scrub repaired any errors. Since I used regular upgrade steps that are written in /usr/src/Makefile when upgrading from 11.0 to 11.1 and from 11.1 and 11.2, I used same zroot pool about 2 years and 2 months. And because I'm using same hardware after clean install of 12.0-RELEASE, hardware is not the reason of performance change. --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 13:44:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA95214AA224 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BCB8A0A0 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 082D214AA222; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:44:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E714514AA221; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:44:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-186.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.186]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "dweimer.net", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C8958A09F; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:44:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) Received-SPF: pass (webmail.dweimer.net: authenticated connection) receiver=webmail.dweimer.net; client-ip=10.9.5.1; helo=www.dweimer.net; envelope-from=dweimer@dweimer.net; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10; Received: from www.dweimer.net (pfSense.dweimer.me [10.9.5.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0LDYIen034425 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:34:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:34:13 -0600 From: "Dean E. Weimer" To: Jov Cc: FreeBSD questions , owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how can I mount 12-R .iso file? Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.4-beta Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net Organization: dweimer.net X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7C8958A09F X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:44:05 -0000 On 2019-01-21 5:56 am, Jov wrote: > the iso file has report a corrupt GPT table and I can not mount the > iso file as usual as cd9660: > > #:mdconfig ./FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso > md1 > # gpart show md1 > => 3 1743095 md1 GPT (851M) [CORRUPT] > 3 29 2 freebsd-boot (15K) > 32 48 - free - (24K) > 80 1600 1 efi (800K) > 1680 1741418 - free - (850M) > > It seems the 850M contain the cd contain,but how can I get the content? > > the checksum matches. Try this: mdconfig -a -t vnode -f ./FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso Then: mount -t cd9660 /dev/md# # will be 0 if its the only md device you have created. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 14:01:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D0414AA970 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Received: from mail.covisp.net (mail.covisp.net [65.121.55.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC6EA8AC51 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:01:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kremels@kreme.com) Subject: Re: DNS Flag Day Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 From: "@lbutlr" In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 07:01:39 -0700 X-Random-Signature: Apple Broke Applescrip[t access to signatures, random sigs now powered by Keyboard Maestro Pro X-Face: )^b5"R:T7U>9~:PEn3YkzMfW*[b1qKeU.fP9C8~8HpU9}lA&6`bH1 Message-Id: <94D235F9-64E7-4CCF-B2C8-F8EBA871C646@kreme.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable References: To: Nicola Mingotti via freebsd-questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CC6EA8AC51 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.986,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:01:47 -0000 On 20 Jan 2019, at 13:49, Daniel Feenberg wrote: > Is DNS Flag Day something that should concern someone using FreeBSD = 11.2 for name service? I ran the tester at: >=20 > https://dnsflagday.net/ >=20 > and it indicated a need for concern, but the details were = unintelligible and there was no suggestion of "what to do". Without knowing what the messages were, it=E2=80=99s pretty much = impossible to give you any advice. When I checked my domain, it simply replied with =E2=80=9CSLOW=E2=80=9D = in a red circle. =C2=AF\_(=E3=83=84)_/=C2=AF=20 I can live with slow for now. I suppose I should read up on RFC 6891 = though and this time for sure get DNSSEC setup. (I am running bine 9.12.3P1_2) --=20 Q is for QUENTIN who sank in the mire R is for RHODA consumed by a fire From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 14:31:57 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B808014AB3F7 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from kicp.uchicago.edu (kicp.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 960638BCDB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.5] (adsl-108-68-162-1.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net [108.68.162.1]) by kicp.uchicago.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4831C71803F for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:31:49 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Valeri Galtsev Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:31:48 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 960638BCDB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dmarc=fail reason="" header.from=uchicago.edu (policy=none) X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[uchicago.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.54)[-0.545,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.44)[0.444,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[country: US(-0.08)]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.90)[0.897,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[kicp.uchicago.edu]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[70.20.135.128.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:160, ipnet:128.135.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:31:58 -0000 On 1/21/19 12:33 AM, Patrick Mahan wrote: > All, > > FreeBSD 11.2 > > Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 > > I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - > > Here is an example - > > Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to=, > relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, > delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host > mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] > Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user complaints - > 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in reply > to MAIL FROM command)) > > I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, or is > this someone attacking me. > > I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for > unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed up. > This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at 9.x). I > also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. > > I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. > > Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here before > jumping on the postfix mailing list. Do you users have shell access to your mail server? If yes, then I would check if nothing happens from one of user accounts (stolen password, bad guys got shell as that user). They can set process that loads addresses from remote place and sends spam message to them all. Most often they would do it through your postfix locally. Then postfix queue will be big time to time. And you will see this in maillog. In less likely scenario (of it really originating from you) when scrips sends directly itself you may increase verbosity of firewall log. One more thing to check is that there are no unexplained processes on the machine. If the machine is simultaneously a web server, that would be next suspect. They may be some form that sends email to address provided by web visitor. But this will be one of the possibilities which most likely will be visible in your mail logs. After you investigated all on your side (or maybe even before that), do as Odhiambo suggested: go to yahoo URL provided and read what they say there. Good luck. Valeri > > Thanks in advance, > > Patrick > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 14:45:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2532314ABB22 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:45:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from kicp.uchicago.edu (kicp.uchicago.edu [128.135.20.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E438F8C6A6 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:45:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu) Received: from [10.0.0.5] (adsl-108-68-162-1.dsl.chcgil.sbcglobal.net [108.68.162.1]) by kicp.uchicago.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224AF71803F for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:45:45 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Valeri Galtsev Message-ID: <46ff038f-959b-838f-8101-7231e4451836@kicp.uchicago.edu> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:45:44 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E438F8C6A6 X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dmarc=fail reason="" header.from=uchicago.edu (policy=none) X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.01 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[uchicago.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.52)[-0.521,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.53)[0.534,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[country: US(-0.08)]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.93)[0.927,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: kicp.uchicago.edu]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[70.20.135.128.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:160, ipnet:128.135.0.0/16, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:45:48 -0000 On 1/21/19 6:06 AM, Carmel NY wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:33:02 -0800, Patrick Mahan stated: > >> All, >> >> FreeBSD 11.2 >> >> Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 >> >> I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - >> >> Here is an example - >> >> Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: >> to=, >> relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, >> delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host >> mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] >> Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user >> complaints - 4.16.55.1; see >> https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in reply to MAIL >>FROM command)) >> >> I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, >> or is this someone attacking me. >> >> I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for >> unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed >> up. This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at >> 9.x). I also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. >> >> I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. >> >> Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here >> before jumping on the postfix mailing list. >> >> Thanks in advance, >> >> Patrick > > Patrick, you wouldn't see a podiatrist if you were suffering from > cancer, you would see an oncologist. The same rational is true here. > Your problem deals with "postfix", so your questions should be directed > there. There are an extremely knowledgeable group. The author, Wietse > Venema, quite often chimes in with answers to user's questions. To join > the list, check this out: http://www.postfix.com/lists.html > > In any case, see these URL's for further info: > http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html > http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html#mail > Better, provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at > http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger. > Although I agree with what you said, it is yet to be determined that there is problem with postfix. So general start that was suggested here can be a good start. And I'm sure on postfix mail list the same starting investigation routes will be suggested. Good luck. Valeri -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Valeri Galtsev Sr System Administrator Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago Phone: 773-702-4247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 15:44:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B251614AD218 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [198.71.6.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3D98ED45 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:44:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Received: from mail2.nber.org (mail2.nber.org [198.71.6.79]) by mail2.nber.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0LFiMiq057343 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:44:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from feenberg@nber.org) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:44:22 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Feenberg To: "@lbutlr" cc: Nicola Mingotti via freebsd-questions Subject: Re: DNS Flag Day In-Reply-To: <94D235F9-64E7-4CCF-B2C8-F8EBA871C646@kreme.com> Message-ID: References: <94D235F9-64E7-4CCF-B2C8-F8EBA871C646@kreme.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 1 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, 2019/01/18 15:01:30 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security 8.0 for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.1.721, bases: 2019/01/21 09:56:00 #9390732 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CE3D98ED45 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=nber.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of feenberg@nber.org designates 198.71.6.79 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=feenberg@nber.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.81 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.88)[-0.881,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[country: US(-0.08)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: smtp.nber.org]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[nber.org,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[79.6.71.198.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.4.2]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.40)[-0.399,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26287, ipnet:198.71.6.0/23, country:US]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:44:36 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2019, @lbutlr wrote: > On 20 Jan 2019, at 13:49, Daniel Feenberg wrote: >> Is DNS Flag Day something that should concern someone using FreeBSD 11.2 for name service? I ran the tester at: >> >> https://dnsflagday.net/ >> >> and it indicated a need for concern, but the details were unintelligible and there was no suggestion of "what to do". > > Without knowing what the messages were, it?s pretty much impossible to give you any advice. > > When I checked my domain, it simply replied with ?SLOW? in a red circle. > > ?\_(?)_/? > > I can live with slow for now. I suppose I should read up on RFC 6891 though and this time for sure get DNSSEC setup. > I thought it was checking for the problems that might have happened on the flag day, but in addition it was checking for all sorts of other potential problems, and giving unclear messages about them in addition. It appears that if you have a recent FreeBSD, the flag day is of no concern. There are only a handful of DNS servers in wide distribution - odd that there is no list of compliant versions anywhere on the web. Daniel Feenberg From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 16:03:11 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022C114ADD4D for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:03:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x433.google.com (mail-wr1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E287B8FAC1 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:03:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x433.google.com with SMTP id t27so23997273wra.6 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:03:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NkglY3DJgJdCmFvzrWBfh+cWKVjFLL305bo0fglf3XE=; b=Xd4yFttqzRXzd2h792JnMB6SueOOdZ1gYZ8zJ01rRx9dRFr0r7oEe2PSjH+dOl4X0J 8/+yFNrxWox5pXTwU/tVzFXVszT+Y3p0ymtUrMiq2Wo1wq7hB4hQBm7/eM7Z3uiPT0wD 64Jtg2BdxTvHO76QJi5hPxXbvV5fq0+jdFyISHzPOKsUYsZnLSfP/Nhy6CpSSes7Vo1N 08A8CZSTLc6ZPLivd9gxpKdmblrdkuV1vSItfhePU/mnn6hvnGIhdXyOmjPex+MGuxI2 eJAUS0EXwADPEfZ6TwC7TpFskfpbYXTtBQ6tDTOmfPCqtUQp8cXVX1bjBCt+AW0Dx8Kv 5rrQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUuke/Fu6NNGBTwoqCca9tnLyzpPegyLuqaO7kTtywD4/K4rbmjgJ6 vJYf1k32WLYPbM1URnlrg/Erj6lU5mg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4g1HE3nBVhFsuCo7G4akxtau98NfnIeeK9MvsHV3G1o69V2kcBJWaP62WkVT+7NZf2YRFvYw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9ec8:: with SMTP id b8mr30031664wrf.164.1548086586796; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:03:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([90.211.170.244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l20sm198866805wrb.93.2019.01.21.08.03.05 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:03:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:03:02 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The mysterious kern.maxswzone Message-ID: <20190121160302.0a5e2805@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <50f1f8d5-7db6-4abb-6beb-c82f17396304@netfence.it> References: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> <50f1f8d5-7db6-4abb-6beb-c82f17396304@netfence.it> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E287B8FAC1 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.71 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[googlemail.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[googlemail.com,quarantine]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[244.170.211.90.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[googlemail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[googlemail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[googlemail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.72)[ip: (-9.53), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.15), asn: 15169(-1.86), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.3.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:03:11 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:56:05 +0100 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 1/16/19 3:20 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > > > warning: total configured swap (131072 pages) exceeds maximum > > recommended amount (113792 pages). warning: increase kern.maxswzone > > or reduce amount of swap. > > Many of my systems show this warning: in general it's harmless and > you can ignore it. Do you know, for sure, that there isn't a risk of a panic if you run out of zone space before you run out of swap. > > # sysctl kern.maxswzone > > kern.maxswzone: 36175872 > > This is strange: on all my boxes (all 11.2/amd64) kern.maxswzone=0. > If you did not set this manually (where, I don't know), perhaps this > is an i386 vs amd64 thing. That rings a bell. In i386 kern.maxswzone defaults to that fixed value of 36175872. In other architectures it defaults to zero, which means use a computed amount based on RAM size. In amd64 you can't increase the zone size because that computed default is also the limit. In this case, with i386, 36175872 is below the limit, so you can increase it. The value is in bytes, so it isn't huge. Try setting it to a few percent above 36175872 * 131072 / 113792 something like 42500000 It should be set in loader.conf, not via sysctl. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 16:44:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B45914AF1A4 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com (mail-oi1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 252136ADE0 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:44:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id c206so15075110oib.0 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:44:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=p4KPS2QWTsqgm8Pfrht9qNgCIR3zLxOUv/xAKv9jrmc=; b=f/TVecoenkSFXjE4P3lo8mOATIDzv7UfckPGfeAV1RiaaqnmCzGPOzDGTJXdc8Xh65 kZQb2ZFcfP+UJv/2xsR9H/33Gy0V8WtO72iFWMIgUkMXGVBQxI9RBSmS9UWiuhkGp/M+ FPmozH6mp7lXddaEeY/6+aIzrre1Ph1CB0PpGNJKd8KXU8Lqqb6Z+dp9bZ7SJVYl9fPj D16yt4KNqqKy0CUvAuBfByVEQF5xAd+r4lRtehDER4W/AXjiUqkLQ1WELkxeNmzLf6gu qqnNssivSEzeQbWSu0qvDOXFjvmSyt+7tqW3HLT1oK8PoiWlpmSV7qlTZhWIvzXez9Wq slGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=p4KPS2QWTsqgm8Pfrht9qNgCIR3zLxOUv/xAKv9jrmc=; b=gqHlad6nCq6PSMXdoWvc6p2CarPSsuXDxxGFeZPOTtIpRAHLxN5sT32PkkNHXQYOGO UXnUubjKDd7ZgxqVQ3v5+oNUaB7DntCwN5RdUhKxSChwdfBMuQr4B6Pa0QCsC+xgxc3H FD9AdUHeeESrvZ6ROz4sZ5z7TGaVS3mIIykk6BtXB+MAd4OtCdJlt7sEXJxPD1tgMO1Q BKy2QBgHRRptXP1fv8S3rIDPf5Ng2oQJFI2VUpOS9mqYEeKnTZZino4/zNU8Xz8FJD7m +r7olocHeEOZhGxRjWSrtrGbfkQ28WFkyOYoTJXvtduav5DHRyvY3nRyDC/8UOCs/w1k hyVA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukc0gMkcB3bVU6MrlZkC3bGTeO6kXmwuFk4jcuEOJlBXXJg8YDA/ fhAzSDrQ8jYM4rvDvetBLg4OTZddgWTbzdT5rFhYkg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5vv7ELo2LwUI8U4AHxteO4IA9vHl3OfuDeiM2ydLuWvXvBa952iKpHDsyDOv1FXJWIy5oSttOZvdLMFHlYd40= X-Received: by 2002:aca:5bc3:: with SMTP id p186mr5925175oib.130.1548089074047; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:44:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH" Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 08:44:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 252136ADE0 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=f/TVecoe; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kurtbuff@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kurtbuff@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.57 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.904,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.66)[ip: (-8.93), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.41), asn: 15169(-1.86), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.2.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 16:44:36 -0000 On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:34 PM Patrick Mahan wrote: > > All, > > FreeBSD 11.2 > > Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 > > I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - > > Here is an example - > > Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to=, > relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, > delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host > mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] > Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user complaints - > 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in reply > to MAIL FROM command)) > > I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, or is > this someone attacking me. > > I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for > unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed up. > This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at 9.x). I > also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. > > I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. > > Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here before > jumping on the postfix mailing list. > > Thanks in advance, > > Patrick I'd suggest, as a first measure, going to https://mxtoolbox.com, and looking at their reports for your domain name and your IP address. Understanding your config and your logs is good, but a quick review of how others see your domain can point you in the right direction if there's an error in your config. For instance, you might have inadvertently made your host an open relay, and mxtoolbox will understand that. (that just an example - it actually seems unlikely, as otherwise you'd be getting bounces from more than just yahoo) Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 17:00:14 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8D514AF930 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from gate.utahime.jp (ipq210.utahime.jp [183.180.29.210]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61676B4F0 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yasu@utahime.org) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (eastasia.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by gate.utahime.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43B87A7C; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 02:00:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from eastasia.home.utahime.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost-backdoor.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7AB537BF; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 02:00:05 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (rolling.home.utahime.org [192.168.174.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by eastasia.home.utahime.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2C94537BE; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 02:00:04 +0900 (JST) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:59:37 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20190122.015937.2204739080712052293.yasu@utahime.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mail delivery delay of FreeBSD mailing list on weekend From: Yasuhiro KIMURA X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A61676B4F0 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of yasu@utahime.org designates 183.180.29.210 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=yasu@utahime.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.91 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.35)[-0.352,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a:spf-authorized.utahime.org]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[utahime.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.27)[-0.273,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; IP_SCORE(0.17)[ip: (0.38), ipnet: 183.180.0.0/16(0.19), asn: 2519(0.35), country: JP(-0.08)]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx1.utahime.org]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.17)[0.175,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:2519, ipnet:183.180.0.0/16, country:JP]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:00:14 -0000 I can't remember when it started but recently mail delivery of FreeBSD mailing list significantly delays on weekend. What is happening to FreeBSD mailing list system? --- Yasuhiro KIMURA From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 17:01:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF42E14AFAC4 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:43:6f73:7461]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gal.iecc.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C1D6B64F for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:01:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johnl@iecc.com) Received: (qmail 10736 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2019 17:01:03 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=29ee.5c45facf.k1901; bh=g5BEYLCd7OG8IBlbNVoZyZl8/qi5JIbPrJQlZcfS74A=; b=oYdI7xa3G6WuOZupC+6xoF0M0jknoh0e4Cr0ODppJ5RjG5FIRN4xwmk0RCIu3d3qG317l3OttVfDf9jbUhVSTC4nEmEcKjtmNr8Tlre5AETxeXw/2iABGvxfH1ixt9pIqszIAu/4TLHs4h4r62aenEjuNn9ScCH+89ABKl0qoiz2TsMDrnW26qgmkoFjE+EWJk/dKWXN6Id9DEdeo2kVDeiIqAWpgvmmeGVxaKrcQVAuA1aoWQNXHcUbhqG87xFt Received: from ary.qy ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) by imap.iecc.com ([IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126::78:696d:6170]) with ESMTP via TCP6; 21 Jan 2019 17:01:02 -0000 Received: by ary.qy (Postfix, from userid 501) id AA4FC200CFE59A; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 12:01:02 -0500 (EST) Date: 21 Jan 2019 12:01:02 -0500 Message-Id: <20190121170102.AA4FC200CFE59A@ary.qy> From: "John Levine" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DNS Flag Day In-Reply-To: <157de54f-bf15-06ba-d47f-923dce0a716c@netfence.it> Organization: Taughannock Networks X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:01:08 -0000 In article <157de54f-bf15-06ba-d47f-923dce0a716c@netfence.it> you write: >On 1/21/19 12:40 AM, Jon Radel wrote: > >> Not enough details are provided by you in the above to have a clear >> answer.  Are you using the FreeBSD 11.2 server as an authoritative >> server for one or more DNS zones? > >Sorry to step in. >What about authoritative servers for private zones? > >I.e. Are those who are serving local.xxxxx.xx to their LAN affected? Tes. DNS cache software will start rejecting bad EDNS, so unless you plan to never ever update any DNS software on your LAN, you should make it work. >> If you're running a reasonably recent version of NSD or BIND, like the ones in >> the packages, you should be fine. > >I've read an article that reports BIND 9.13.3 and 9.14.0 are ok, but we >start from dns/bind911. >Is that fine? I don't know, but why don't you upgrade to a more recent BIND? It's not hard. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 17:32:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A5014B0BF4 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70B1A6D1E6 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0LHVrZY026805 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:32:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: The mysterious kern.maxswzone To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> <50f1f8d5-7db6-4abb-6beb-c82f17396304@netfence.it> <20190121160302.0a5e2805@gumby.homeunix.com> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <06a5651b-fdd8-1dcf-d0b1-1e3d4dafe11d@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:31:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190121160302.0a5e2805@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 70B1A6D1E6 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.62 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.23)[ip: (0.68), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(0.34), asn: 30722(0.08), country: IT(0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.97)[0.966,0]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.83)[0.830,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx.netfence.it]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.71)[0.705,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:32:07 -0000 On 1/21/19 5:03 PM, RW via freebsd-questions wrote: > Do you know, for sure, that there isn't a risk of a panic if you run out > of zone space before you run out of swap. Short answer: NO! I don't know for sure, but I think this isn't the case. From what I read around, IIUC, zone space is used to manage swap space, so the only effect is that some swap space won't be used. I hope someone with more solid knowledge steps up... > In amd64 you can't > increase the zone size because that computed default is also the limit. Then, why do I get the same warning ("warning: increase kern.maxswzone or reduce amount of swap") if the suggested operation is not possible? I guess the message should be patched. > The value is in bytes, so it isn't huge. Try setting it to a few percent > above > > 36175872 * 131072 / 113792 > > something like 42500000 "Huge" compared to what? :) The OP has 512MiB of RAM: 42500000 byte is not a negligible amount in that case, but he is the only one who knows if it's worth, based on his load. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 17:37:12 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6C314B0D61 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C47406D3B1 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:37:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0LHb32V027411 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:37:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: DNS Flag Day To: John Levine , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20190121170102.AA4FC200CFE59A@ary.qy> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <94df173a-8d45-dce4-adc8-f1d2df66c5df@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:37:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190121170102.AA4FC200CFE59A@ary.qy> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C47406D3B1 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.984,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:37:12 -0000 On 1/21/19 6:01 PM, John Levine wrote: > I don't know, but why don't you upgrade to a more recent BIND? It's not hard. Time (or lack thereof), mainly. It's probably not a long work to upgrade BIND on a dozen servers (assuming everything goes straight, obviously), but that's also true of several other softwares. Upgrading them all would require a LOT of time: I just upgrade something when it's needed or the new version brings some tangible advantage. I'm just trying to see if this is the case with BIND (before I risk breaking things for no reason). bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 18:40:34 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC72014B2F13 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:40:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe35.google.com (mail-vs1-xe35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CD57870845 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:40:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe35.google.com with SMTP id x64so13179349vsa.5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:40:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=HtxlGVU4G7kZGuJEsa87xPbM+HblyFR+/5BzpKFVoM4=; b=oa85rUG+whJ+Rgab2VJxjclj58O6U4lmKnCHDqw+lU+XLiIN0B7ydhfYY5cm30Ub6b OvHa5MTSTV4leADi5Ngnhisiy1UsqSS+boHCMzDzKXQ4etqYVaLp31S+im0KnzW/FwTb B/tMr6oJexzP7ArK29Nb8PQQpRHC0/wH/apc/VlM0t5b/IbLknc8NEfJG6LCT1O8qWlV ycvyBMB8Vh64M1JfBU+Gqer7lU+jm5ImmZSSj6xIwGTz7GcU0K39tzGZoXGO8v5wEW0v 9yagrQJvay4lTtu8Vyr+qRNVyKt7x9GzXXPlFbeMiRvcxl5LK0WOxX5Q/xxzeE3AYgwn POgg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=HtxlGVU4G7kZGuJEsa87xPbM+HblyFR+/5BzpKFVoM4=; b=Z4ztO4M11qw0hDgol1QmffPjT5246Ck0r2BLiel8xhmLGNu18OrUPiYPUHD3kTuvoB lH/SqB6z2ttXa4xPGL4RAn/EzpvSGoTjT1WP+T/f/8ykgMKhWdAMT2keNMXMUbcFy/2y huwIfiO3TqCqgpSG5M6J8YKIZFMkIkqVnhHbLOuK8XCSgKwZYZR7Snn8MemPJgXOye80 R4UBvcaGXd/N65fsrwNX3vIDgrObjAmkhYOtmDshkDi6rm21Wu4B+WiiAukl1BrwwR/K DUFCL0tCLqggcV3t4DjZspSD4ieGHsO5RTht8w6UfZl6TLgQkf6aGDPSzpsP4ewgj1fW vrzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfvmhUNPXCRYpCq4qKluxQXQdNtdwSsDjmKPJc5++8Zyevhpqwx delDKLhlQY6juYffU1Qvw9VdWlSbXaNxDLQvXis5iUNU X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6qawzkONJwfp+mHoX8j3Gg6hUH/DHcAfTzqC9ObZnRZnaKxYqSgmVNGhC9zWz1uncShsrVQFXX/P5T3ziumps= X-Received: by 2002:a67:3d54:: with SMTP id k81mr12664098vsa.57.1548096032150; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:40:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Mahan Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:40:21 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: "Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH" Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: CD57870845 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=oa85rUG+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of plmahan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e35 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=plmahan@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.83 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[5.3.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.83)[ip: (-9.78), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.41), asn: 15169(-1.86), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:40:34 -0000 Thanks, mxtoolbox shows that I am on 13 out of 95 blacklists, so it seems I was sending out spam. Patrick On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 8:47 AM Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH wrote: > On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:34 PM Patrick Mahan wrote: > > > > All, > > > > FreeBSD 11.2 > > > > Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 > > > > I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - > > > > Here is an example - > > > > Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to= >, > > relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, > > delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host > > mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] > > Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user complaints - > > 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in > reply > > to MAIL FROM command)) > > > > I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, > or is > > this someone attacking me. > > > > I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for > > unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed up. > > This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at 9.x). I > > also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. > > > > I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. > > > > Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here > before > > jumping on the postfix mailing list. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Patrick > > I'd suggest, as a first measure, going to https://mxtoolbox.com, and > looking at their reports for your domain name and your IP address. > > Understanding your config and your logs is good, but a quick review of > how others see your domain can point you in the right direction if > there's an error in your config. > > For instance, you might have inadvertently made your host an open > relay, and mxtoolbox will understand that. (that just an example - it > actually seems unlikely, as otherwise you'd be getting bounces from > more than just yahoo) > > Kurt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 18:49:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7071214B3566 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:49:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ua1-x92b.google.com (mail-ua1-x92b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::92b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84CBA71494 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:49:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ua1-x92b.google.com with SMTP id z11so7222878uaa.10 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:49:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0Z6TQF0B8X7yL5lIoh2CocZ53pJrU3FwXEna9GysL7w=; b=HQNQRIQpdNMXhHUa3mLEpkjCmztPvlUgJGKnXb4T6rO241/RWJAXAy6wbae0s9g52Q GPnObJqu9de94Ji1YD1UA4RXkFvcJPP8daQv32NopSoFQY0EZlJm0aVanANf4GEEQvvb JoE5ojENM4WgR5sBXVC3S8VYVqzKQFKlpnTfvpd8WKJdSjGcw6j0GkBwwTpYNBuzKM6T 8tvcCYURcc3uNCaIn9W1tIHOcJ5Q2wzsXXAsrImfk+JjN0Raq0yhv1h7m6EixuU44P90 UoKtE6ozS7vkWUXN+mtmQoAtm0r8S5H4Mj7xWBr7QHyA3ZHfxZeSFCeqhKZzatSZ5XYi IlsA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0Z6TQF0B8X7yL5lIoh2CocZ53pJrU3FwXEna9GysL7w=; b=hLCPo6BctmStFfG/wlJrnlrvj7q/kI7VyCWbTt6ZWsNfnVpc7kmocOcw0OG8E4QIPd um/4rMSCmBLbxGMF0dT8dmHLlb9Ou5K3oP4GuZg/rcudCfdwqiiIbumQGlNo9kSN18Jz VLUgrenyrzqISfedmHaFLKdJujA42mOfNQqiJoWzoWoTDbQhWlVBMCa6WVac7dxhablO JJw/aNYLY3B1beUoSFeNs09pJ2yo9SdEQnNQ93eCLztL3lRANQbGoucfG0ZmoalDnrQM nZVpjAuE+cOuei7untpGrJp2DlO2BNy0rfHol33VtZLYFNnoUlwucnmlOTQXNfBOj22K j7XA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdDqEnLSh/lOc8pnX3xc0xL/9Pqvi1fZL810PTNf2HhXYkuFca+ Xl+12Aq+qWByHtn6CQc+H2llu4/GTmhTC9dOzJE1mp4u X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6CFqjyGyiWiKh9EzPDMxkdPQ1XhYIWB6+TWDGkv8LVDQRA79puo3Ygmz+gkDsNzcmBUBT1AYCsaTKk0nn15FQ= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:48cd:: with SMTP id y13mr12116520uac.49.1548096556693; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:49:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Mahan Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:49:05 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: FreeBSD X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 84CBA71494 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HQNQRIQp; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of plmahan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::92b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=plmahan@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.82 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.987,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[b.2.9.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.87)[ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.42), asn: 15169(-1.86), country: US(-0.08)]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.950,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 18:49:18 -0000 Thank you, Carmel_NY, I have applied to the postfix mailing list. Also, thanks for the pointer to postfinger. It looks very interesting. Patrick On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 4:08 AM Carmel NY wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 22:33:02 -0800, Patrick Mahan stated: > > >All, > > > >FreeBSD 11.2 > > > >Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 > > > >I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - > > > >Here is an example - > > > >Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: > >to=, > >relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, > >delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host > >mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] > >Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user > >complaints - 4.16.55.1; see > >https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in reply to MAIL > >FROM command)) > > > >I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, > >or is this someone attacking me. > > > >I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for > >unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed > >up. This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at > >9.x). I also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. > > > >I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. > > > >Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here > >before jumping on the postfix mailing list. > > > >Thanks in advance, > > > >Patrick > > Patrick, you wouldn't see a podiatrist if you were suffering from > cancer, you would see an oncologist. The same rational is true here. > Your problem deals with "postfix", so your questions should be directed > there. There are an extremely knowledgeable group. The author, Wietse > Venema, quite often chimes in with answers to user's questions. To join > the list, check this out: http://www.postfix.com/lists.html > > In any case, see these URL's for further info: > http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html > http://www.postfix.com/DEBUG_README.html#mail > Better, provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at > http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger. > > -- > Carmel > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 19:05:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF3A114B3FDA for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9EBD72685 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2d.google.com with SMTP id x64so13220724vsa.5 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:05:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MSjjpgTH8GHhQduC9OMXZW6FtjUY3VDy25tUtwQGRmc=; b=jOvaTCiSKMLsobpmji3np1Z/wGbowwz0nqrR4f26bnOB6s2JrYZeapXwkyJtP0KPZ6 ggLsYWiR2R5Wo3oD1TH3DOiHT7o+zATgVjQILK+9WoGP/CDIs6MuGeFJ0V3+wARqaBWe eOt9lcKpJxO6a7kQToGO1rSjNIMp6zDZ3P4Kofpf53aplHCmTpH4dRp/31K5iGopm2L2 clR1lQ2TBuJ0OKvQp67sGDORICcedLyqKKwyb0AZgYtyu0HyDPRSAf3yqq2ySmOCelPj xO/c3ZtgReUMNAFoFya7fdW5Nfzdc+5SXjsPrieGgkmd8/pogg5nhzA9/ezMWKOASWDx Z7gA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MSjjpgTH8GHhQduC9OMXZW6FtjUY3VDy25tUtwQGRmc=; b=Sgbg1sL1pPsuw8yvqQwKgYBX6nZ1jakuSIGz+lpSB7D5GOt1nCfL4wlKa1dbG9jhXk ASN204xgkEOkOjEeoMb628VnI60U+OMckYsR7I8h0oFnSK/2v5dkypBwgqTX/wgN4M0r FVkteiZEh4t90Tbm+20b4Gy936HHI2iFNHdcraJxWxPvCNIv5n089evJa3xNvtCRj/3j OqMTP9FJB8Ibj+rdoBYDDSVs2dtE8TS/rYFx2Yy3bFjisZw9k+rmjr7cQgdVESc5P9CS ahx2v6ZrXlErYMevShnvMiJbPNRCTwSzWRDpr1p2t8My6qrlsUmy6y83I3l1y5Kabcbi Ixlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeI0OQB9htXhv1TCCztXK+8FGNbBYrPNQAqSHEl+uhwO3PXbd7n o1ZDVm+c+fddMkc4vb3OxF0Opf48xdvUJ9cRqgf+98M2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6L0MJIDDgHR+q9wJRd1fn0BNIbdCnvvH07MhCpaBM3/55ETGnOYUJNkAn1Ot8/O/XYHTrLqZGEYp5rm3u5O4o= X-Received: by 2002:a67:87cf:: with SMTP id j198mr12502258vsd.104.1548097505717; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:05:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Mahan Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 11:04:54 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: Valeri Galtsev Cc: User Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A9EBD72685 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=jOvaTCiS; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of plmahan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=plmahan@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.56 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.99)[-0.994,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.69)[-0.686,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.2.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-0.87)[ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.42), asn: 15169(-1.86), country: US(-0.08)]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:05:08 -0000 Valeri, It does not seem compromised. I have no unexpected processes running. I'm getting subscribe to the postfix mailing list and will seek help there. The Yahoo URL only was singularly unhelpful, only stating that I might be sending spam. Which is when I decided to seek help. Thanks, Patrick On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 6:33 AM Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > > On 1/21/19 12:33 AM, Patrick Mahan wrote: > > All, > > > > FreeBSD 11.2 > > > > Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 > > > > I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - > > > > Here is an example - > > > > Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to= >, > > relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, > > delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host > > mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] > > Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user complaints - > > 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in > reply > > to MAIL FROM command)) > > > > I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, > or is > > this someone attacking me. > > > > I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for > > unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed up. > > This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at 9.x). I > > also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. > > > > I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. > > > > Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here > before > > jumping on the postfix mailing list. > > Do you users have shell access to your mail server? If yes, then I would > check if nothing happens from one of user accounts (stolen password, bad > guys got shell as that user). They can set process that loads addresses > from remote place and sends spam message to them all. Most often they > would do it through your postfix locally. Then postfix queue will be big > time to time. And you will see this in maillog. In less likely scenario > (of it really originating from you) when scrips sends directly itself > you may increase verbosity of firewall log. One more thing to check is > that there are no unexplained processes on the machine. > > If the machine is simultaneously a web server, that would be next > suspect. They may be some form that sends email to address provided by > web visitor. But this will be one of the possibilities which most likely > will be visible in your mail logs. > > After you investigated all on your side (or maybe even before that), do > as Odhiambo suggested: go to yahoo URL provided and read what they say > there. > > Good luck. > > Valeri > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > > Patrick > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > Valeri Galtsev > Sr System Administrator > Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics > Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics > University of Chicago > Phone: 773-702-4247 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 21:07:38 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A06914B8792 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57E8824EA for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:07:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2c.google.com with SMTP id t17so13410512vsc.8 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:07:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=4v7OxF+YG4uOUQ0N8HubZ29eSkNWH6EHQSWFDlmMklk=; b=lVwWLEk4J52T61aYhfy3iP5e1e8PVxR5Hs0DKvTtlH2Kiy8AFtNfDwpnRZaFif4Ek8 NbvgwW9sMIcj8YO2zgXQWFacGmavmzwC1QzUwkJyBFxkqaweqn3A2waUvi7fy0p+y8O+ k0CLsfKhaXO/HxJdHlK6zx/ZMs8RihB6HNxcIKMCwivFk9LRHdfLA48oW1N2jDO5ZcK0 dN2uZ/dlphe08z9aQglS1ydKsi3LTL28WrUKO9i2y1WgpQvZ5UYxEORTmrVXWu1JGV23 wgZ7FXhQxbcTzfqu5DLTAUhQw/seqsp+JeVbi+z6n4hcPqvqbj2VLsY8R2NElbq8gAg0 GDAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=4v7OxF+YG4uOUQ0N8HubZ29eSkNWH6EHQSWFDlmMklk=; b=mn6t4TXZCR6jYL7AuqSKt+4qtOp2ECRi/QoepRTHANWywC8wnkIpRBRbRGSQP5m0kT YPNYFTLTgHB0ZVzdsFv665GvPRA0Pv6Q3jRQA3VbgDMYJm6l4nfkxsIcVCI7Ji6tnt1t t40BDDfJnsYXSsAG9lNh3V8gSZeS8rjTIITAqHl1SzEMajHhC1z/HTwDD8yNSJll/+c9 knGqoz+hReEfmXZn4MDAmtZPfcBzFPTpLPQ9qjiz6nZnf5jCaFQYizaJUpbn82lpxfEx sGyMF938Mie6xs283jH4dMnCkg7B63GK7K+eA4gvrt3ucmQp1wtQFupVLq9MofGq4I4Z 5Q/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcC+LgkMim+UEkHMVgzCT9JVfvbx/r6bkP5UkFZ+c7GOCgnnb87 inIuB/6ZVRejP2fqFcmdTFbE8akVhbZ0AUUAtLVwj20R X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4lrU/vXkE5UJTvyvdsjnjUzuwHlPmPx5Khz+JWCaUG1Od27I/MIT7Ch2kg1Sq3FiDUTumxwU8xl9rSomULguY= X-Received: by 2002:a67:87cf:: with SMTP id j198mr12660942vsd.104.1548104856476; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:07:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190121210121.GB20854@neutralgood.org> In-Reply-To: <20190121210121.GB20854@neutralgood.org> From: Patrick Mahan Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:07:25 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: "Kevin P. Neal" Cc: FreeBSD X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E57E8824EA X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lVwWLEk4; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of plmahan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2c as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=plmahan@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.84 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.980,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[c.2.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-2.85)[ip: (-9.87), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.42), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.08)]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:07:38 -0000 Kevin, I completely agree, but it always depends on how good a GP you have. Took me a few years of discarding before I found my current GP who is very competent. That said, I have been on and off a user of FreeBSD for close to 20 years and have always found that starting with freebsd-questions is never a bad thing for a first step. Patrick On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:03 PM Kevin P. Neal wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 12:06:04PM +0000, Carmel NY wrote: > > Patrick, you wouldn't see a podiatrist if you were suffering from > > cancer, you would see an oncologist. The same rational is true here. > > Your problem deals with "postfix", so your questions should be directed > > there. There are an extremely knowledgeable group. The author, Wietse > > Venema, quite often chimes in with answers to user's questions. To join > > the list, check this out: http://www.postfix.com/lists.html > > I might see my general practitioner first, though. Maybe my GP knows the > answer, and maybe I need to see a specialist. It doesn't hurt to ask. > > -- > Kevin P. Neal http://www.pobox.com/~kpn/ > "14. Re-reading No. 13, I realize that it's quite possible I'm losing my > mind. I'm glad that for the most part I'm not aware it's happening." > -- from "20 things I'm thankful for": Fortune, Nov 29, 2004, page 230 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 21:22:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDC114B8DD2 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092005060.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.5.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173D482DDB for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:22:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=97C3N+vlD+/en/z4uke6MWUU5ePe5Tll8zzeknvEyWk=; b=kiRyV/Byhu/MAV0eeqrzqet/tzTR68GWFh8nw0HDPhyW8Zh0doxBZy2G9uUxSoK7qDOyGfntEd7bp3sKQV61JKNKbR7Y+/EZJNsuU2koETGZhFSblXnFJfPvpfRGr31jFKu8oVfgfzbr+KXqenhthm9Du0X3AMMBcggfvlCN/VHY0liXEDxHUlen4I5lS9YAT7DKq4z26bxhi6tPLvTFiDXQ8A46ZgFfO00J8a1UK+HyOPN5nUTL81i3kMgLFRgvvcxN9m3Qe+aGAGbQ7upEZWQXYsdM2CNIxNAZ1GPBgPNOCYCuCDWYT3ptuywyP66NSx80bSkJQ7Yh5YidtHepzQ== Received: from BL2NAM02FT013.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.76.54) by BL2NAM02HT115.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.76.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:22:00 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.76.54) by BL2NAM02FT013.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.77.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:22:00 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a]) by MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a%11]) with mapi id 15.20.1537.031; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:22:00 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues Thread-Topic: Trying to understand some email issues Thread-Index: AQHUsYGu9zGue95bZEO0XGWVX4Wi+Q== Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:22:00 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: FreeBSD Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BN7PR11CA0018.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:406:a8::31) To MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:72::8) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:34E47DAB849CA2132C5B33E8BFC1F93B635457D0BBDE4D505F7726789C975323; UpperCasedChecksum:B9359B594A0EB8A390329B15718A7955D429C7F06F2D824240265DBE365F9095; SizeAsReceived:8768; Count:66 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [dG7dQ46pzHsD1oXnfC9XT0nf3S+hyuerDzs2y/dL99g=] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20190121162155.00001839@outlook.com> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BL2NAM02HT115; 6:xD/kniSbF4w+LKub4k44Xa0Pz8bwTpM2QvF2bcW4VOhyY4c0Rf5LPxeZFNj9Zy//jGdeJAvwaR7cSBnygnkLy0YmG4VgJNQ/30wYJ2DmXuOdosVDFPfXnF4fjX3c+g0+8Z+F7pl0QgxBx14EbTqDzJ6V5y5hoyRKRl52WxSp6iaos9TDK/KovkWbRxjP3Cfl6Og4wqgcya1Zh2IAonOOzNNvXUyna0aNW0K10LWaK5290IUqVoU6ZriH8kU73A4bNoVw6uD26cfVo+cL+prTrJ+pvRXlV7gyU6fBn0VhFDBZNUVP99jH1BsfOy4w3COZIsgzHHxHxRG+gEzJANsv2JoTUrXb6IE66jKAhZPMH4pAYaL8VXOMn0f7ltiAYpoI4b0qnwTNDVgN1G49hqqQZBlT+Jc82CCZdb8WLnqqDE8Rxkkbe0t0bnG67qsqimzbU0Uaqqf/5hgtfmkHJUF2OA==; 5:HYe7O46r2KlPbrUCSn8Lr2QBJEjpv2trCtkIz/Sn7453h2qRXPVl+s94Fxl1HgeFPZB874sb2By3Co2hLl/jRvLi9TIKl3Cv0Gr72whMzTlgjT7jDWABkwkL8ek9F6xEaYV22Mr6aPG7QKW50tmtQNhsS8VtGY3K5/JhOH5yAPNuFKZRXhThPLN10qPTkynqL4gAJ8BO6voDHXyQ9EOCiQ==; 7:fWnZHD6uCnUFwg5+42fKF2p7/OOyLxAZadBqtJqf+uy6FLWLC2+maxsPAkO5RYn2Pn6ew+akNU6kOhMzEkEY1uqS8Fh12SSbBRkPAnHxBV94nTjccJ3gwcaXEr8auBXCb/UtXHHsY8kMsw3UW6PrGA== x-incomingheadercount: 66 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031323274)(2017031324274)(2017031322404)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:BL2NAM02HT115; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL2NAM02HT115: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4566010)(82015058); SRVR:BL2NAM02HT115; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BL2NAM02HT115; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: FBFq9fVvtgUdIcPw5t1b8E6KM+QrHv6VDuhtWYQCxxFlkwuoyaQyByIRk9YpeSoO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 550d97a2-e7f8-42d1-258f-08d67fe67ae4 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Jan 2019 21:21:59.9420 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL2NAM02HT115 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 173D482DDB X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=kiRyV/By; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 40.92.5.60 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.17 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/14]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.85)[-0.854,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-0.97)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-2.51), asn: 8075(-2.26), country: US(-0.08)]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[60.5.92.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:22:04 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 10:49:05 -0800, Patrick Mahan stated: >Also, thanks for the pointer to postfinger. It looks very interesting. It is a great tool. It will give you everything you need, in the proper form, to submit to the postfix mailing group. If it is indeed a problem with your configuration or with postfix, they should be able to sort it out for you posthaste. --=20 Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jan 21 21:31:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C5614B9151 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw1-xc2d.google.com (mail-yw1-xc2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC39B832FD for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:31:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from noeldude@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw1-xc2d.google.com with SMTP id f65so8570411ywc.8 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:31:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=9tAl+dofiDdz6rSwlejbGhbarFDWvOfb4mb2qYq2UFM=; b=nwqEvqrSWZUN3df5HZ3Uw/cS9EO749oLpLsadKzvsQwg2fUzb/uoXubKLYJYjR4qdf eZqThuc0eEC8HFcWbSuroHCEDbBNyrmL99CdBd7E0quCIliRm54EzTsgVsGIfUFOynVR 1//NCg/C8AvVnypY5HLL855+MGN7crjOM/1SLhiUWEtNi750QS2ShDVZ1mBfODfWwHfQ qIW51zOfVs4GPkgHy4KxUnobmyGkW4cVp+31IMku3WSG3tc5MwvCrVFpts/CsRupk+Qa EddzSEzv2mugiguEfYis7J8MsdZyJI4rs5DKe/FnSTZEAwsS4GxPiDB1VW2cFPZ2v8BW pfwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:openpgp:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=9tAl+dofiDdz6rSwlejbGhbarFDWvOfb4mb2qYq2UFM=; b=SXqXpyXdqCZtEFRd7BhHvnbcauiPdYmUjD4ty/kmEvA4VnVoGlxYGY6mkbBfWVXnvz 3KR8UgHFJ7MfjIW28NSfjpVPL3BrMcSGONv0sR8aVo/Uh0eTVJqNHvpWeUmpgLxVFsbT gwV/0swEl6yMTOV8UdqoFpzgWb6mfa6bpuabQoTlR6Q6FeNnx7FNoAd7Kg+Lgoy1uh/4 UiuW3Gi23fIpnWtgAUPmqgsT7raCCSQVRbaohL2Ai9klqwefl2/JQgiQ6zOUsR3pTvN6 zRFRvYxcfstyjoDctAr0heehMB0ULNHe2GPjcKn+/pRUyUJothL6ZSOj9Wl1DwhCA4hC xBsA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeWPHqSoZgLrD1WnToX7tXdBlPd/id50EdbTe787MooPw6jWVIV 8OiltBXtKJvQBM8dJMg7DPEOmc6/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN53A5UP3nke/QdiLZpeHSHlQGCJCxaUWdJ3cG6gmd4IFYrQU1kk8SutGRZQ0s0FuO1Zw6ymgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a81:3093:: with SMTP id w141mr30383114yww.24.1548106275185; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:31:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.170.63] ([12.244.165.78]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n2sm7776038ywe.37.2019.01.21.13.31.13 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jan 2019 13:31:14 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: Noel Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 15:31:14 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EC39B832FD X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nwqEvqrS; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of noeldude@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=noeldude@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.84 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.992,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.84)[ip: (-9.82), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.42), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.2.c.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 21:31:18 -0000 The log messages show you are *sending* mail, not receiving. Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to= Thanks, > > mxtoolbox shows that I am on 13 out of 95 blacklists, so it seems I was > sending out spam. > > Patrick > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 8:47 AM Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH > wrote: > >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:34 PM Patrick Mahan wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> FreeBSD 11.2 >>> >>> Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 >>> >>> I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - >>> >>> Here is an example - >>> >>> Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to=>> , >>> relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, >>> delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host >>> mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] >>> Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user complaints - >>> 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in >> reply >>> to MAIL FROM command)) >>> >>> I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, >> or is >>> this someone attacking me. >>> >>> I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for >>> unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed up. >>> This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at 9.x). I >>> also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. >>> >>> I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. >>> >>> Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here >> before >>> jumping on the postfix mailing list. >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> >>> Patrick >> I'd suggest, as a first measure, going to https://mxtoolbox.com, and >> looking at their reports for your domain name and your IP address. >> >> Understanding your config and your logs is good, but a quick review of >> how others see your domain can point you in the right direction if >> there's an error in your config. >> >> For instance, you might have inadvertently made your host an open >> relay, and mxtoolbox will understand that. (that just an example - it >> actually seems unlikely, as otherwise you'd be getting bounces from >> more than just yahoo) >> >> Kurt >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 22 01:19:47 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A49C149B63F for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:19:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A7B8CFB6 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 825F0149B630; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:19:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FBBA149B62E for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:19:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-x142.google.com (mail-lf1-x142.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::142]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E11EC8CFB3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:19:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf1-x142.google.com with SMTP id a16so16828302lfg.3; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:19:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cdqPn35rDeEI0GfOhF64XzskztZqf77KfZowovDdL+4=; b=UQ0Gdj/fQbaN/bTGW4zND3hiquJ7mDgfZyKy++WLVoLmXAO+ESoBPPXd1kPV7lUtEF iDI9svTrfkpDE/Qa14BJLRDc3TfZ5pyyaYo9bADr6HU82D2qx/TSU8dnSlgU1RNg0ZWn 9xl/kFznNGULjTfA13KdLeEYuGmbLEDEdQMQM6GV90ju96oquONSBbj0oJcyIaVT7Pg/ q9q3xxrFX+uZiSU52QCifwTKIMbObYpnBcpfVJHvdWTZGvTUtQKgz2sd/yAkE1THLQOH AVVc5Mt8NXF7PrjdsF5uvF2C+ktNpIu6KphA4FBdsEGZ+tqVAgV9TKsn4w8PrA0/hlfk v6Hw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=cdqPn35rDeEI0GfOhF64XzskztZqf77KfZowovDdL+4=; b=a9x5NgEfR8kNCcQqVsBebWVEWu9s7qNpm2QhLcpyKuQawOQGXQjhX5rY6yuUFQ3rbE J7z9kEh8ZHLZwH9QKwQO/AwokTFCTPJ45FUPN49c/x/Gvvxyl5LB5Q0JnmW3HMeHYL8f 9hWZlFHwc2ynr2ZYoKQemChKOPfRB2S8Q/4ROS63lDMmTwywFE2/n1ETb1uXT90yI6tN kE8anhKGOR19wTUu0kkVNwAAoqvEsCkSNbTxdDFa6QcOgf2W1+WoYOax6sQcgm+DOZ46 ToSmwamUryRuFhDsNIGpnZbFIeSiIw17mB9cK3idZkcHbDzIaib8BlId16edM5J3il36 7tBA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeZetM1u9GIR++8n9mg+R8QdvujSEr6ATG+NcjhZ3oCc01k9jgv K7mtcR3HluuuxMb5oNlzzM4tWZFOUiXFIrmqPqzc08E4 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7CmhuiPECZhO7g5IL2XMc2F8gATNp6BtbaO9aHaJ6kUfNUkZu2q/cyknYZoJ3o1Xy8Rci+Nn0GpJOgg2Vul4Q= X-Received: by 2002:a19:ced3:: with SMTP id e202mr19169007lfg.13.1548119979747; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:19:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Aryeh Friedman Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 20:19:27 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: building firefox from todays port updates fails with no compiler error To: port-bugs@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: E11EC8CFB3 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UQ0Gdj/f; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of aryehfriedman@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::142 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=aryehfriedman@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.29 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.93)[-0.927,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.06)[-0.056,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[2.4.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.30)[ip: (2.63), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.16), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 01:19:47 -0000 building firefox from todays port updates fails with no compiler error message: (snippet but scrolling no errors are found either) /usr/local/bin/clang++70 -o Unified_cpp_gfx_skia9.o -c -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/stl_wrappers -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/system_wrappers -include /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/config/gcc_hidden.h -DNDEBUG=1 -DTRIMMED=1 -DSKIA_IMPLEMENTATION=1 -DSTATIC_EXPORTABLE_JS_API -DMOZ_HAS_MOZGLUE -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DIMPL_LIBXUL -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/gfx/skia -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/c -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/codec -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/config -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/core -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/docs -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/effects -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/encode -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/gpu -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/pathops -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/ports -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/private -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/utils -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/include/utils/mac -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/codec -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/core -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/gpu -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/gpu/effects -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/gpu/gl -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/gpu/glsl -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/image -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/lazy -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/opts -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/sfnt -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/shaders -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/shaders/gradients -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/sksl -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/utils -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/utils/mac -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/gfx/skia/skia/src/utils/win -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/include -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/include/nss -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 -fPIC -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/mozilla-config.h -Qunused-arguments -DLIBICONV_PLUG -isystem /usr/local/include -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -Qunused-arguments -Wall -Wbitfield-enum-conversion -Wempty-body -Wignored-qualifiers -Woverloaded-virtual -Wpointer-arith -Wshadow-field-in-constructor-modified -Wsign-compare -Wtype-limits -Wunreachable-code -Wunreachable-code-return -Wwrite-strings -Wno-invalid-offsetof -Wclass-varargs -Wfloat-overflow-conversion -Wfloat-zero-conversion -Wloop-analysis -Wc++1z-compat -Wc++2a-compat -Wcomma -Wimplicit-fallthrough -Wstring-conversion -Wtautological-overlap-compare -Wtautological-unsigned-enum-zero-compare -Wtautological-unsigned-zero-compare -Wno-inline-new-delete -Wno-error=deprecated-declarations -Wno-error=array-bounds -Wno-error=return-std-move -Wno-error=atomic-alignment -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-gnu-zero-variadic-macro-arguments -Wno-unknown-warning-option -Wno-return-type-c-linkage -fno-sized-deallocation -O2 -pipe -O3 -DLIBICONV_PLUG -fstack-protector -isystem /usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -DLIBICONV_PLUG -isystem /usr/local/include -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector-strong -fno-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-rtti -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections -fno-exceptions -fno-math-errno -pipe -I/usr/local/include -O2 -O3 -fno-omit-frame-pointer -funwind-tables -Wno-deprecated-declarations -Wno-overloaded-virtual -Wno-shadow -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-unreachable-code -Wno-unused-function -Wno-implicit-fallthrough -Wno-inconsistent-missing-override -Wno-macro-redefined -Wno-unused-private-field -I/usr/local/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/dist/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/fribidi -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include/harfbuzz -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/local/include/libdrm -I/usr/local/include/libpng16 -D_THREAD_SAFE -pthread -MD -MP -MF .deps/Unified_cpp_gfx_skia9.o.pp /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/gfx/skia/Unified_cpp_gfx_skia9.cpp gmake[5]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/gfx/skia' gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' gmake[3]: *** [/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/config/recurse.mk:34: compile] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' gmake[2]: *** [/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-65.0/config/rules.mk:431: all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build' -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 22 03:25:48 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C874214AA2AA for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 03:25:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com (mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CDF86E2F7 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 03:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plmahan@gmail.com) Received: by mail-vs1-xe2b.google.com with SMTP id e7so13882557vsc.2 for ; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:25:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0wLQdoQM6fzg6Cl18vv9HMo9vjzxTCZtea9iZ9rYAHA=; b=YW4Qb2b8CcqZsvQA8XSwLL4pcRFhJ4p9BN1RcWY17RfhIylqCfiNfJKGYBPPg7qIKd KJsAEux37XmCLCbpurrXx+p1IoutZ2YleGkwwzE7A3L/YkQ3iZDBLWzaNDPY5BUdWqSQ zVYPXWCFsuCTV0NzFRZ85WTqk3vv12w7XPrjFJ7Urpt9BuXbsx1fLvhmX63NGvTC1q3x t4PzhqUBUlYbE0LzCsuBTXz3u2XG/Vb/MQ0M79KZFKOaoA5QC6zSACkTepOa7SLAyQjG k3vKfkdw/737H9HNseURilHbus7vvAd355kNFluvjiuGptmA3iBVeUN1Nk33UeTCaL8P WLxw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0wLQdoQM6fzg6Cl18vv9HMo9vjzxTCZtea9iZ9rYAHA=; b=QHtikHkbzcN5c61iNhHi50HxLJnbnLeUtolgGqkoSbIMMyxqSsG/vYxCWo34V6x62m y3ZVPj8lvfYYhs+yczfKoiQDnGJBt4cnOFPdPzUCcmUEdwMUTHtEIVuKMB0ZNhmFqxtX ZOV+EafZkWOcD2IANPEUeP3cBV7oHRKkSRe17PqpoiBB6mSvwRjFOHgnAlXIA20g49Xx 67Ik0yYHGwniBzWQqpIW7pkl3ep6OtDtTOuSOIKrt4fdruGNMiV0P8OQ/rDpk7eOcvm8 r2+33qLyKUJuFnfmL8uR0A5FlY99EHjTjVWQUqHO5v3faE32Li+KUaEQ8GTFcIBpOhty rPMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukftdUREPjelTWzV3/6W6gaF6/F/V1aQnSqYWdl4gBnZUIW2vEFB 8puX2O8V4lZSBYuqyRwSM6n7fiLrXeg3LjPo83w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7LJHUok2z+UYOc9oicROA9TiA/sLmYy5w+y5PQh+neVADOz5YHbq+yjufbnAD+4y2t20aaLlNskmvNQ9a0jjs= X-Received: by 2002:a67:c86:: with SMTP id 128mr14088202vsm.221.1548127545744; Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:25:45 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Patrick Mahan Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:25:34 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues To: Noel Cc: User Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7CDF86E2F7 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=YW4Qb2b8; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of plmahan@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::e2b as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=plmahan@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.55 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.74)[-0.745,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[b.2.e.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.79)[ip: (-9.59), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.43), asn: 15169(-1.87), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 03:25:48 -0000 Problem solved, some how I had allow some spams through sometime yesterday morning which was when I was initially configuring postfix. So I must of allowed it through. postqueue -p showed a number of deferred messages. postcat -vq showed that they had come through around 4:30 pm PST yesterday. There were about 6 messages in the queue. I used 'postsuper -d' to remove them and those messages have gone away. I have not seen any new messages of that type. My maillog shows multiple drops of unverified users attempting to relay through. So my next goal is to get my site off of some of those blacklists. Thanks, Patrick Thanks for the help On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 1:33 PM Noel wrote: > The log messages show you are *sending* mail, not receiving. > > Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to= , > relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, > delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host > mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] > Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user complaints - > 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in > > > Search earlier logs for the first mention of the QUEUEID for this > message, 2DA97A2E2EF, to see where this particular mail originated. > > You running a web server on this host? Insecure web forms are often > used to send spam. A new server install might have forms you didn't > have before, or didn't intend to install. > > > > -- Noel Jones > > On 1/21/2019 12:40 PM, Patrick Mahan wrote: > > Thanks, > > > > mxtoolbox shows that I am on 13 out of 95 blacklists, so it seems I was > > sending out spam. > > > > Patrick > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 8:47 AM Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH < > kurt.buff@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> On Sun, Jan 20, 2019 at 10:34 PM Patrick Mahan > wrote: > >>> All, > >>> > >>> FreeBSD 11.2 > >>> > >>> Running postfix 3.3.2_1,1 > >>> > >>> I'm getting hammered with thousands of emails from yahoo.com - > >>> > >>> Here is an example - > >>> > >>> Jan 20 22:09:01 ns postfix/smtp[1308]: 2DA97A2E2EF: to=< > pwascak@aol.com > >>> , > >>> relay=mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43]:25, delay=13730, > >>> delays=13728/0.31/1.1/0.06, dsn=4.7.0, status=deferred (host > >>> mx-aol.mail.gm0.yahoodns.net[98.137.157.43] said: 421 4.7.0 [TSS04] > >>> Messages from 23.24.207.145 temporarily deferred due to user > complaints - > >>> 4.16.55.1; see https://help.yahoo.com/kb/postmaster/SLN3434.html (in > >> reply > >>> to MAIL FROM command)) > >>> > >>> I'm trying to determine if I am somehow relaying emails to yahoo.com, > >> or is > >>> this someone attacking me. > >>> > >>> I am pretty sure I have postfix to avoid acting like a relay for > >>> unauthenticated connections. But this maybe something I have messed > up. > >>> This has been happening only since I upgraded to 11.2 (I was at 9.x). > I > >>> also just recently switch from sendmail to postfix as well. > >>> > >>> I can provide my postfix config on request if needed. > >>> > >>> Pointers to other mail-lists are welcomed. I decided to start here > >> before > >>> jumping on the postfix mailing list. > >>> > >>> Thanks in advance, > >>> > >>> Patrick > >> I'd suggest, as a first measure, going to https://mxtoolbox.com, and > >> looking at their reports for your domain name and your IP address. > >> > >> Understanding your config and your logs is good, but a quick review of > >> how others see your domain can point you in the right direction if > >> there's an error in your config. > >> > >> For instance, you might have inadvertently made your host an open > >> relay, and mxtoolbox will understand that. (that just an example - it > >> actually seems unlikely, as otherwise you'd be getting bounces from > >> more than just yahoo) > >> > >> Kurt > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 22 07:47:05 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A156C14B1C51 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:47:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it [2.44.121.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C72777380 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:47:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) (authenticated bits=0) by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x0M7kpS2015165 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:46:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: The mysterious kern.maxswzone To: "Kevin P. Neal" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20190116022046.GA45024@admin.sibptus.ru> <50f1f8d5-7db6-4abb-6beb-c82f17396304@netfence.it> <20190121204421.GA20854@neutralgood.org> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <6556ab0d-d250-b418-6704-2b32c8b3cf08@netfence.it> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 08:46:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190121204421.GA20854@neutralgood.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6C72777380 X-Spamd-Bar: +++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [3.31 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.90)[0.905,0]; IP_SCORE(0.23)[ip: (0.66), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(0.33), asn: 30722(0.08), country: IT(0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.94)[0.938,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx.netfence.it]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.36)[0.356,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:47:05 -0000 On 1/21/19 9:44 PM, Kevin P. Neal wrote: > With the difference in performance between a CPU and disk, does relying > on swap space make sense anymore? I think it still does. Of course performance will be terrible, but it can be acceptable for short periods of time: e.g. I've got a box which will swap considerably when periodic is run, but that happens at night and no one will notice. Also, I prefer an occasional slow down to processes being occasionally killed. If the machine constantly and heavily swapping, it's time for either a software diet or hardware upgrade. > The x1 and x2 rules of thumb come from a different era. One thing to keep in mind are crash dumps: they are written in a swap partition, so, if you don't have enough and your box panics, you won't be able to debug it. I've been hit in the past by this: a box's swap was be taylored to RAM size, the RAM was doubled and crash dump could not be obtained anymore. I also heard something about "minidumps", or compressed dumps, but did not investigate... so yes, all this *might* be obsolete; however, with modern HD sizes (1TB at the least) I prefer to "waste" some more space for swap, than to be sorry later. That's also why I don't bother about kern.maxswzone: I have some swap space I don't need *now*; it's just sitting there for eventual future needs :) > Oh, and won't swapping to a GEOM mirror cause deadlocks? I thought so, but > I wouldn't take my word for it. I have several boxes with swap on GMIRRORs and I've never seen any deadlock due to this fact. Just my experience... perhaps there are corner cases? bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 22 12:14:02 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F1E714BAF45 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092002066.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80E79897BE for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=shjsLMkt0sHHN4lpvxhsSj7ONBNoD85+oEEJ8aGKoYY=; b=fqPWAAnxhT2rtoz4XFfAvBBBR9VPa8a/80ZNZ6/MkB+C0wKKdKA2TJOQ6VQZl2gP7v/aLPMV/ZptzXDz6JvZBK8Qmxlz/AOAP1/ji0BAg0R9n+1udduE04SfqVl2Zww8dYZ3kOKLZW3ZjrlRcawFhQ7c5lFz2LWNZxBJBc/+MWM0tnwXtKCDL2zxjqSsgHUOlZewyCWy5ZPx4hPeQSmYN08B2TKWw+Rcbnl6VtJ5MlFioWsTb2/WmOxIBsazTbLXfw0aU3Dh3fzJ6rLivDLA1kT+pxgY4CWleagLKboOQVrH8Mf8lde9JZ7Iz7ralZxC0CFcxoLzIJQVb37q+/3LGA== Received: from BY2NAM01FT022.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.68.60) by BY2NAM01HT216.eop-nam01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.68.220) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:13:59 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.68.59) by BY2NAM01FT022.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.69.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:13:58 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a]) by MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a%11]) with mapi id 15.20.1537.031; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:13:58 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Trying to understand some email issues Thread-Topic: Trying to understand some email issues Thread-Index: AQHUskvw9zGue95bZEO0XGWVX4Wi+Q== Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:13:58 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: FreeBSD Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BN6PR17CA0001.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:65::11) To MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:72::8) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:BD5FEA7DE87F5DBB6624DDF7E2A436A53479534F5583A81D4EC5F32F1E3555ED; UpperCasedChecksum:14C098CEFAD031C3251AF218734433A1F1C0BB23193A39F83BF52457FA668195; SizeAsReceived:8878; Count:66 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [N4juIlAn0e8KOC0sSC/0kqWEI64S3TsZfEbVmUn+gv0=] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20190122071352.00007e2d@outlook.com> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2NAM01HT216; 6:TIalglC7QSm3CIB+doYtduDy+BFvgqfZl4Wa4VJO+L1LWGpEhQBn7StJ15ZNVcAIZ8+B4El560zQ+MVplUEUx0S3QngjHejvmq6nTKZ8BIFRXOABHw1Qs2cRaFmOrJSsgdSdojk8UA+MKWTGySNrjZ2X5x4hDQrLhRBeX7k8lhOoJj5eIobEzrb6jeX9qBbqRW5XX1qcdHa2wvZ9yhCd/W2iVZkElYf3r261bfI5r4wvp6puE8QwqgHdm2kTczpcGrVMrD7e3jTJpDJEPEePs0Ztdx8cRts+dy9etAIGNnScQaUAMiK5E530xS97PLHmZgNG7cUljTEL90Tg2t8CWhxTuJpV7A015+Yj+7gyWz660LQjl9efLBk2gYgruX1ikK5ExEC+GCK/g0Ar2tR64ZI2vxx9Xs2EPo6ZdoSK6UxUlU6ynzpIrn91CJGD6ja+2yB8ZdqVAJE+qKNvbeHF5w==; 5:CszTSOSsmIoabv/nOasgORYVswM7p32hbD4cCm9w/H4qSFJ6e6JgRIc2qZoCOMeRCC5emN+ZVninfqKzxiqhGkNWka3fzxfdG93uuOQcu3XuAIv7XI3UKu1YFhsheWG+KA9dcvs+jl4+EOUNNsluAqI8d/z6jyLayLba8aFuc6UbiLgEwUTkcZy0bHStezR97t2w/hjPq8i3uG4jsyzDlg==; 7:qtHIx44z+GS0+PgirJPyszqMjuyHYpjDiraFGjpFFwXTSUkWpInHGhk2XyAY4i/EtqhVvqbwKWDtPHEgOaug4hXTla7avTU8Bf2z48l00A3lZzcEDmBBd0JgAku8A3hbtAt4AGsstm5YlKoSuBehPQ== x-incomingheadercount: 66 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031322404)(2017031323274)(2017031324274)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:BY2NAM01HT216; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY2NAM01HT216: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4566010)(82015058); SRVR:BY2NAM01HT216; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2NAM01HT216; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 06rPoLKFs4+zqq0LuoZZXDkydYYi9sl5j1x8ONsRjIpAU2TqACvsmTX5lFbZFYQX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 1c733c5f-a866-4399-b542-08d6806315cf X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jan 2019 12:13:57.4514 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2NAM01HT216 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 80E79897BE X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=fqPWAAnx; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 40.92.2.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.26 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/14]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.76)[-0.758,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.996,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-0.97)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-2.54), asn: 8075(-2.26), country: US(-0.08)]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[66.2.92.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:14:02 -0000 On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 19:25:34 -0800, Patrick Mahan stated: >There were about 6 messages in the queue. I used 'postsuper -d' to >remove them and those messages have gone away. I have not seen any >new messages of that type. My maillog shows multiple drops of >unverified users attempting to relay through. So my next goal is to >get my site off of some of those blacklists. Using "postsuper -d ALL" is the quickest way to clear out the queue. --=20 Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 22 13:10:32 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754151481498 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:10:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@belics.com) Received: from belics.com (www.belics.com [107.161.21.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "belics.com", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07EFF8BC14 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rob@belics.com) Received: from belics.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by belics.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x0MDANwi031316 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:10:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rob@belics.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=belics.com; s=default; t=1548162624; bh=bQ0zRXd+g0n9jccXiBAcBlEVyBZOLah57v1sVFYYRSQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=WorJq4YWocfDU7srgiEty4s/gijMrJVdPu23zX52cNum4QDJrw9jLSH1ZMSHDoYXb DxCCGVRFFTVF54AsLN+AyNNJ9y/y9yQ2rQIU9K64iTx4PIJ3vqVysM2M+jbhOIslWN RaBKRtgLSJkg+2stXlCi4SE9azfbCBAjNf4KgU/4= Received: (from rob@localhost) by belics.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id x0MDAI2n026971 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:10:18 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rob) Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:10:18 -0600 (CST) From: Rob Belics Message-Id: <201901221310.x0MDAI2n026971@belics.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Mail delivery delay of FreeBSD mailing list on weekend X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (belics.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 07:10:24 -0600 (CST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 07EFF8BC14 X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=belics.com header.s=default header.b=WorJq4YW; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=belics.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rob@belics.com designates 107.161.21.234 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=rob@belics.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.07 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.77)[-0.774,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[belics.com:s=default]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(-0.08)[asn: 3842(-0.30), country: US(-0.08)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[belics.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[belics.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[belics.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.21)[-0.210,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:3842, ipnet:107.161.20.0/22, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 13:10:32 -0000 I double posted on the doc mailing list thinking I had done something wrong with my first post so I noticed the same thing. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 22 14:48:44 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 938FF14A4131 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:48:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from mx31.harte-lyne.ca (mx31.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx31.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA_HLL_ISSUER_2016" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC378F4F4 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:48:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from mx31.harte-lyne.ca (localhost [127.0.31.1]) by mx31.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A42486B9 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:48:27 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from mx31.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.31.1]) by mx31.harte-lyne.ca (mx31.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.31.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbhMWrwe6aU3 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:48:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from inet17.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet17.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx31.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:48:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx32.harte-lyne.ca (mx32.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx32.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA_HLL_ISSUER_2016" (verified OK)) by inet17.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD3C4196DDC for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:48:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx32.harte-lyne.ca (unknown [127.0.32.1]) by mx32.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC81612F6 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:48:24 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from mx32.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.32.1]) by mx32.harte-lyne.ca (mx32.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.32.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bP7D3rjoZuuN for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:48:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (mx32.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx32.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B43D212C9 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:48:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:48:22 -0500 Message-ID: <43a420614231c3ac353881abd33dc446.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:48:22 -0500 Subject: ezjail update error From: "James B. Byrne" To: freebsd-questions@harte-lyne.ca Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EEC378F4F4 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.81 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:216.185.71.0/26]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[harte-lyne.ca:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[harte-lyne.ca,quarantine]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx32.harte-lyne.ca,mx31.harte-lyne.ca,mx132.harte-lyne.ca]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.80)[ipnet: 216.185.64.0/20(-4.94), asn: 12021(-3.96), country: CA(-0.09)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(0.00)[freebsd-questions@harte-lyne.ca,freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12021, ipnet:216.185.64.0/20, country:CA]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[harte-lyne.ca:s=dkim_hll]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[harte-lyne.ca.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.4.1]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 14:48:44 -0000 We upgraded one of our hosts to FreeBSD-11.2p8. When we updated the jails on that host using "ezjail-admin update -u" we received these messages: The following files will be added as part of updating to 11.2-RELEASE-p8: /usr/share/zoneinfo/Asia/Qostanay Installing updates...mkdir: /usr/jails/newjail//boot: No such file or directory mtree: mtree: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel.old: No such file or directory /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel: No such file or directory touch: /usr/jails/newjail//boot/kernel.old/.freebsd-update: No such file or directory Could not create kernel backup directory However, ls shows this: lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 14 May 28 2018 /usr/jails/newjail/boot -> /basejail/boot This appears to me to be an error. Either the soft link should be /usr/jails/newjail/boot -> ../basejail/boot or /usr/jails/newjail/boot -> /usr/jails/basejail/boot The directory of /basejail has never existed on this system insofar as I can determine. However, examination of other hosts with ezjail installed have identical entries in /usr/ The version of ezjail on this system is: Name : ezjail Version : 3.4.2_1 Installed on : Thu Nov 8 09:15:24 2018 EST The last time we ran an ezjail update, on January 7, we did not get this error. There is no history of anything ever being done directly to /usr/jails/newjail or to /usr/jails/basejails. Further, the find utility shows this: find /usr/jails -name kernel.old /usr/jails/basejail/boot/kernel.old /usr/jails/mx31/basejail/boot/kernel.old My questions are: 1. What does the error message mean? 2. Why is it reported now and not before? 3. How can it be eliminated or corrected? Thanks, -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Jan 22 20:05:07 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA1F714AD6C4 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from katherine.allison@correctlists.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B29C6D10A for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:05:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from katherine.allison@correctlists.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0D7EC14AD6C3; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:05:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CB714AD6C2 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from katherine.allison@correctlists.com) Received: from cl-spk2.correctlists.com (cl-spk2.correctlists.com [142.44.199.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 355F76D101 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from katherine.allison@correctlists.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=correctlists.com; h=Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; i=katherine.allison@correctlists.com; bh=vesMea2tQF/Q2bEVMYHIf4ViXSs=; b=MGlKk1T3DOGWFo4nrqvebs4I5nMbuKuA3d+aFxs2gKTMiaa2qNVHkNZ36IZSY0wuvoOulGJiU8GT ytZzfep089C3PkaovQHctrZW4mNmxbMYjolPB8zZWw85Axgqki4/99Nfkjv0R4PobjcjcefGnRrw oMdoJjxTNIhktdVrT34= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=default; d=correctlists.com; b=dW3VqbSDk+oOcdx14JJ48UpxB0rxD40SyD/OOUYqOu3L/uRjLVv0dtSqcD9rseN/3aooDhmapSjg t4EWEFqXmOvg9Sg+CmuIR3O/0BIdgL3TujATgMOAQwNeE2i8KB87PTurkj+kshXzqOQNh5js0ze0 7GssFuALBeLVwWUUBBI=; Reply-To: From: "Katherine Allison" To: Subject: Database Sellers Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 01:23:11 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Thread-Index: AdSyi9EO3D3wDJ7xTC6kfrJy4JdOLw== Content-Language: en-us X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 355F76D101 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=correctlists.com header.s=default header.b=MGlKk1T3; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of katherine.allison@correctlists.com designates 142.44.199.12 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=katherine.allison@correctlists.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.30 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; SUBJECT_ENDS_SPACES(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[katherine.allison@correctlists.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_REJECT(1.00)[correctlists.com:s=default]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[correctlists.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.92)[0.916,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[greylisted]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[correctlists.com:-]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[0.997,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.00)[-0.002,0]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; IP_SCORE(0.69)[ipnet: 142.44.128.0/17(2.83), asn: 16276(0.65), country: FR(-0.02)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:142.44.128.0/17, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:05:08 -0000 Hi, Can I send you a Price of one of our Database Sellers based on your requirement? Kindly just share your requirements by filling in the below table: Industries : ----------------------- Job Titles : ----------------------- Geography : ---------------------- I'll come up with the data counts, costs & few sample contacts for your review. Regards, Katherine Allison Business Development From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 23 01:35:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4261314B62B6 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 01:35:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anders@jensenwaud.com) Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D792A83607 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 01:35:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anders@jensenwaud.com) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id z23so292091plo.0 for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:35:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jensenwaud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:subject:message-id :references:in-reply-to:to; bh=Q795l6JZ6si34lv++orBY2ISAkq4m5xQ/IhrneAgxts=; b=rBOUQFAxB0ITtXsNWanFQrltxl4SHZNpv3K0WddFB862sXUsWI7y6eueBM2yKoZ6Xz vJsfvRMv20WAtdMEWL0EM9KW251XGQ1yCxTg48Vf8aT1XJyp/hGc46DM8LXRPFgu7cpL nD1aAROdcVycACly3+oXLeAlsWbEyHUvbI8RLCdElQu1QowRZZBMFa6ePXrbhjcA/Szl twa7OlmHdG9WdiPZtkLnyLGNLNC1cVOSjXTkM4YTSnXJVhKQ9K1ysqTXYKmUoqI4VbOg zslZ9r2vjg3MjHPBRMfSAL2i8ezsc7PTenWDiTgC/mIEFSyKVBkr9rz0d2oEitYBEgb9 m/VQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date :subject:message-id:references:in-reply-to:to; bh=Q795l6JZ6si34lv++orBY2ISAkq4m5xQ/IhrneAgxts=; b=MGb4Y+qyfIrUehv7pvUlPJkHvtoHjuq/ReMi8faaHt6bAW2veF5PZuwuQt3lIjbYSs V6VSQtVkz5grf5tpPD3fJd1VwjJXeuKoX7W2ukmMrFLIFX1vZlwib4jRoxT0LFkWlLZq I2k62nIMJfUOvsajMs7L5RrL8Ht6yXqAqK+vZmC88IpRJN3/FlrDQ/ynkoO6c9vwtm6R ZQHXZxdat8tGwZXJuyiLW+o8ts0KSNkaUe1YGg8qy9LoSOPXOwlQMZPGLcHRtuWZrjg0 25/ea4OF0GP9Ci5sp1NTZTx3RFSzCZSUHT3ceW5D2mbRMwFuGSuoLgvXulRxoD3J4c46 d3uQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeQYFceFqgFGvCJcisE6xYW/q/5zu11FhFzRr+f/qLgjmku+DuC wi++7EdfQdcJDPHvB3DfOnKNyGNgHhA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5xUWhVv4PcvR+onXet8HBVUC85FhU4WpftWoDa+e4dexYXiIjFIcve06TaUl2f6ESpcXbsyA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:50e:: with SMTP id 14mr264127plf.141.1548207314069; Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:35:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.166.171.150] ([1.129.169.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10sm24871764pfj.183.2019.01.22.17.35.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 22 Jan 2019 17:35:13 -0800 (PST) From: Anders Jensen-Waud Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:35:10 +1100 Subject: Re: FreeBSD on MS Surface Book Message-Id: <05767382-556C-41F8-890E-2EDCDCBF50D6@jensenwaud.com> References: In-Reply-To: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16C101) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D792A83607 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=jensenwaud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=rBOUQFAx X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.58 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[jensenwaud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[jensenwaud.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[jensenwaud-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[alt1.aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx2.googlemail.com,aspmx5.googlemail.com,aspmx4.googlemail.com,alt2.aspmx.l.google.com,aspmx3.googlemail.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[9.2.6.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.963,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.81)[ip: (-9.63), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.46), asn: 15169(-1.89), country: US(-0.08)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 01:35:17 -0000 > On 20 Jan 2019, at 22:36, Anders Jensen-Waud wrote= : >=20 > Hi there > I=E2=80=99m trying to install FreeBSD 12 on MS Surface Book (1st edition).= It has a Marvell Wireless Card =E2=80=94 under Linux it is called mwifiex: >=20 > https://github.com/torvalds/linux/tree/master/drivers/net/wireless/marvell= /mwifiex >=20 > Unfortunately FreeBSD doesn=E2=80=99t recognise the wireless card. It also= seems to have trouble with recognising the keyboard so I have to plug in a U= SB keyboard. Seems there is no support for this wireless card on FreeBSD. I have bought a= USB wireless card as an interim solution. >=20 > Is there any chance to find a fix for the above issues? >=20 > =E2=80=94 > Anders From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 23 13:16:20 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F141C14A7C52 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:16:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk (outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk [95.142.156.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3A0C72399 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk (unknown [82.71.56.121]) (Authenticated sender: mailpool@milibyte.co.uk) by outmx-028.london.gridhost.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BB0A526648DC1 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:16:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (helo=curlew) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gmIO2-0000VE-QB for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:16:11 +0000 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:13:08 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20190123131308.39221e51@curlew> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.2) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Subject: Kmail using 100% cpu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C3A0C72399 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk designates 95.142.156.253 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.86)[-0.863,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ptr]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail3.eqx.gridhost.co.uk]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.03)[-0.034,0]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[milibyte.co.uk]; IP_SCORE(-0.11)[asn: 198047(-0.47), country: GB(-0.09)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[253.156.142.95.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:198047, ipnet:95.142.156.0/22, country:GB]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 13:16:20 -0000 Kmail has started to consume 100% cpu. It works OK for the first few seconds after starting but then goes 100% cpu bound and is totally unresponsive. I've never seen this problem with kmail in the past. I've tried clearing the akonadi cache but that made no difference. FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p7 kmail-18.12.1_1 akonadi-18.12.1_1 Any suggestions how to go about fixing this problem? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 23 15:29:20 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E3514AB351 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dumitru@smart-inform.com) Received: from smart-inform.com (smart-inform.com [5.45.65.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C26B577570 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dumitru@smart-inform.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=smart-inform.com; s=dkim; h=Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:To: Subject:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=exVZEVjxWUJE7bUY9wBCF0smluv4cUWZMvUDDBrzx14=; b=sgs7VVHEgQ8Mr76qsD4512WErQ v/xj2GDtf2de61m3o1C9MPHg6PgGqYF0DR7WjcU61TvmvmmyV0iL6RpjSW2PVRcSIzcBAUzqn+eO/ 6l8EhG3QBwvQsWX5cOFuVEsw8IVEjhDLm2hvT/+zScrYH74ZD9gmH+KU8/d4jLKIDLW4=; Received: from dup214.araxinfo.com ([217.26.167.214] helo=smart-inform.com) by smart-inform.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gmKSj-00070H-QX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:29:09 +0300 From: "Dumitru" Subject: Trade Market reports on imports to CIS Countries, Asia, Latin America - Full year 2018 To: "freebsd-questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: Smart Inform Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:29:07 +0200 X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 190122-4, 22.01.2019), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Message-Id: X-Scanned-By: ClamAV 0.99.4; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:29:09 +0300 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C26B577570 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=smart-inform.com header.s=dkim header.b=sgs7VVHE; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=smart-inform.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dumitru@smart-inform.com designates 5.45.65.71 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dumitru@smart-inform.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.19 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:5.45.65.71]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[smart-inform.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.smart-inform.com,mail.smart-inform.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[smart-inform.com,none]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.00)[country: NL(0.02)]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[214.167.26.217.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; ASN(0.00)[asn:50673, ipnet:5.45.64.0/21, country:NL]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[smart-inform.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.4.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.75)[-0.747,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[smart-inform.com:s=dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_1(2.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.93)[-0.926,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.87)[0.871,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[71.65.45.5.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.4.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:29:20 -0000 =EF=BB=BFTo attn. of Export and Marketing departments, Market trade reports and studies are available on imports and exports to: Russia - Full Year 2018 Ukraine - Full Year 2018 Kazakhstan - Jan-Sep 2018 Uzbekistan - Jan-Sep 2018 Vietnam - Full Year 2018 Indonesia - Full Year 2018 Philippines - Full Year 2018 Mexico - Full Year 2018 Colombia - Full Year 2018 India - Full Year 2018 The reports contain all figures related to importer/exporter names, quantit= ies per importer/exporter, values on invoice, detailed description of goods= , market shares and other relevant KPI's. Please contact us for more information and sample Dumitru Smart Inform Click Here to Unsubscribe --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 23 19:16:20 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2530614AFDFF; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:16:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russ.haley@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it1-x12e.google.com (mail-it1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43F5486DE0; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:16:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russ.haley@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id m8so639506itk.0; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:16:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uV4BDjoAuZjWjvqTXffn9MC9zLTHu+D2h7S0wEoGoVk=; b=WacJdWVAPyZsG5PEQNom4jMOhsVhRBHXk/khS/hL5mkQiVEW/01DhYer49EUcjnw9D 5W0jUDam7xdaXtbAwXNiD+giKpDV56rL2ZDiqtUYZgQ3fHH5GggLStKVfwzSiU5HVXg5 yRYp9Pdm5rXa5egIb5lTJEaXJ0tP0Wc5ySSW+/AQMY1gr4124LPzURXmkE3VXhgYPKxw k4VMKqQC0Y4G7RnpELdP9lMjrZapnlkfZqWE8L/hm753TKjmX+BFgeajMEXGtnc44/Ii m9X3Jqikl0JGhfIYHqO6k6zbnFFE6IiPYsrbANVM4IIsgzZ85zz2pOJ7sR7eMBvmMXgH onmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uV4BDjoAuZjWjvqTXffn9MC9zLTHu+D2h7S0wEoGoVk=; b=co+OQrIuuAd/Uwu5vNot5mrMPBMZ3yZd/qf8PnwdhEJ5BLla8nTqJGl+1JEDD/zLzJ rzlnXGV3BFeNdBidr5FwT6citXySy+Y2WaP9tTfWDCiZobwlX0nrCyIqRGRKl7k0ljNU 5V2Bx/IiQ0Cs0IAnr3OzY+rsWOyFluPmUA4g3vxROWsH/LdyuSnSuIntrYUKPOmbwouj 1T6Iy6beZPbRU5xh2VVhszfhxPLmDSUiqwoBhR88fog8fenr5UUoa46EndqAUUIctS4f R8GXgcyh0Q21MNQCIi0aYzE6CKpGXNQ2YSaSJjAPIv814aekHwsF3v5b9xDHs4joR3lo i7Zg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukez/wmN5CvROaJRa8Z3c2nlbNmLfdjHlTZ4qZRrJXjr0i8iMWCf 1a5ZxrPnFRV4s0q/SkOYxHO4+PA11fajVmmek8hwTQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3Ia/4qoqAvwmE7UrKCwJyjNycYqc9/TcOpX1lFcGHP1U1sC0BHtAsKo99f1GaSsvd7itvRc/GbSga7ZDCCWHTD0= X-Received: by 2002:a24:4110:: with SMTP id x16mr2739201ita.30.1548270978301; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:16:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Russell Haley Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:16:06 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Website down? To: "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 43F5486DE0 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=WacJdWVA; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of russhaley@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::12e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=russhaley@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.27 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.64)[-0.639,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-2.62)[ip: (-8.67), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.47), asn: 15169(-1.90), country: US(-0.08)]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:16:20 -0000 Hello, I was attempting to view a bug in bugzilla and was unable to get to the bugzilla site. I then tried to get to www.freebsd.org and was also unsuccessful. As I can't get to the site, I didn't know who to contact so I emailed the two most relevant mailing lists I have access to. Cheers, Russ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 23 19:25:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8273F14B06A2; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 288848756C; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id 5219E3C475F; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:25:49 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: Russell Haley Cc: "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Website down? Message-ID: <20190123192549.GA96060@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DocE+STaALJfprDB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 288848756C X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.93 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.932,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:25:56 -0000 --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:16:06AM -0800, Russell Haley wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I was attempting to view a bug in bugzilla and was unable to get to the > bugzilla site. I then tried to get to www.freebsd.org and was also > unsuccessful. >=20 > As I can't get to the site, I didn't know who to contact so I emailed the > two most relevant mailing lists I have access to. I was seeing extremely slow loads, but things seem to be back up now. -- Brooks --DocE+STaALJfprDB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJcSL+8AAoJEKzQXbSebgfA2fUIAJdZXceiPTlfaNUFgMv+zW15 70v5FX1juhxWCDcctHfwKjHNz+g8tHp3HNaGpKpWOTyXm+f844vz8Igm+5FNyIxn vl9VHF6c/tkivUdQBW0fZXFV2+N7JF6MnjO977wqNEgJS0n+uXx4PbtRZfsvmp64 ErV36D4lxP4c1dZiZPpKkjjdquQWkhVDxyNbnJjD1gXl/yjZVbBAugwKQvpQIb2M VUhYfvXK2Nk1Ykj1SOQ1ZnV2FEWYkNUgogAXtVwl0IpdkxX1wYTybtlTg5la5Z3A eoV/5N9J3pXLZL06OS6sxsxQwtQkLVnhpubKWjoqEVjmYO01rZlIM7RsELIMFBQ= =MbSp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DocE+STaALJfprDB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 23 19:30:04 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB74B14B097E; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 721F887843; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE29A6AA; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:30:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gjb@freebsd.org) Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:30:01 +0000 From: Glen Barber To: Brooks Davis Cc: Russell Haley , "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Website down? Message-ID: <20190123193001.GC75306@FreeBSD.org> References: <20190123192549.GA96060@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rz+pwK2yUstbofK6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190123192549.GA96060@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 721F887843 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.97 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TAGGED_RCPT(0.00)[]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.97)[-0.969,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:30:05 -0000 --rz+pwK2yUstbofK6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:25:49PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:16:06AM -0800, Russell Haley wrote: > > Hello, > >=20 > > I was attempting to view a bug in bugzilla and was unable to get to the > > bugzilla site. I then tried to get to www.freebsd.org and was also > > unsuccessful. > >=20 > > As I can't get to the site, I didn't know who to contact so I emailed t= he > > two most relevant mailing lists I have access to. >=20 > I was seeing extremely slow loads, but things seem to be back up now. >=20 Oops, I replied to Russell without CCing the lists. Yes, it is back now. We had a brief network disruption. Glen --rz+pwK2yUstbofK6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEjRJAPC5sqwhs9k2jAxRYpUeP4pMFAlxIwLkACgkQAxRYpUeP 4pM78g/6AuwaiW4Q4UPVxPHBPL6o+L4SEYBwKqU8ziJBcWiyIQL4EyXhY4sN03re 1mq2GuWtZQNGFVWymoRhOXC0dVtjtdA9MjVXCMuXplldCQkOJX1Qu0LdxJwxrWU/ NftgesW6FxqfJLeWgG1k9aRWI9OBuw80qHEb1uDZiB1kjaPbjNwh57wzEnHIVsAj hO+P+qhtktS6ilj5WmudYhAhQd3iKKxPC7gTLmu9r6Ivvy+NCmFb+7J5X/REy2Kn LbUqckVKPR0OdhgnBCnX088xdC8LNlUoXHhpdNjRpVS5BJH+UZHRKIGfWXix43ci ILiBhKljG3XzIjvSvjiXr9pRhvReiK13q35bnGEU6GwqGFpHDf1aTPDEVBI9GQVS qClWiLBh3G7fh00opwlRfKpOeMwZc3ZB7SIGhmDfj8gtJs+grMz9PZk5UKg2rB7i PtRcOUr7D3uVoeusN4gJNg3fUC2x9tFk/ewtlnE+v7P/Whl1R9YoQl+/MhQ5uglC AYcXvXRyJBxAW2yVQrEFKtAqCSTQlbRzq54sTiCuivOAEddwTCpFmyycgLUo0i01 XWOO2JkJJ39ImyxyXCF5MBX+WB8Se5wyv8dXZCdI+Y48ICXnfwnJYqJBv11AkIya UTMk3ALaIsetRlNiR0PscZ0FiV5B/xlA7Ro4495/92xElqbgo8k= =rOaO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rz+pwK2yUstbofK6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 23 19:33:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA2A14B0CAD; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russ.haley@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it1-x12d.google.com (mail-it1-x12d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25B4587DE5; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from russ.haley@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it1-x12d.google.com with SMTP id z20so856003itc.3; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:33:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=rNPKlzK1MjoqV2uTnWeLNyWfilMzgSa3q+I3JtbBnCQ=; b=ftUcQAVfzly/wv2d58omzDf/cJjTmD1HQHBL1V0TTJPiClWBTnvepd9hh3SQcu+uL1 Pr13ytM7sVowC1Ihn4lBi9AtnJUyGBLHLRsOuzEZKamXH9K04Sb5tWGd5vZHyKI2jZde WkLlBM83WWpwzHy0KgGlstWMnZz0X1KgyAsGh90ydzdCc7xA49vd0n0jjwKyhLbMAJnN Ao7zCLb338unzAW0mpxuxwDqcd/wzU3kdtzlHyxDaK5SqPjXES/Ncdb3Ql+4uXoL/ZNm gA3yPR3N87tVSpkjb+/toW01KVjIpL5Tjv0HAd4gCsvaK5pa+CYdwIXQPaaL/7ljvDoc xPTg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=rNPKlzK1MjoqV2uTnWeLNyWfilMzgSa3q+I3JtbBnCQ=; b=WvS50Ezc7fQ50FA2byRSy3kxtc3gXS8M4Qciw1LPETPT1fhX7YRu9cOWY1vFe2ijOY uuKldeVzk0s0a9ae1NAlPQWO55JjQ+DcL6YKzIp7d+/yeF8kQcCpy6p7VsQHA6ze29B5 yX2c9os0SjNXzrc7t/yDJzKTy8BZAsDUHdXacv2lIYZGPxSc+pzPA2jXc5KzkpLkcwMt uYvVPqgQxoy0zvxaFnyqWCtzVBzgDKruwpsPHdoF0sJI1NJS1U6syPv9IUfN0NGwd6NT XIl7wMGyBEf0lVGrfNjukNxUEDGN7yrRY2teGyQpC+E2tjojFfZPUCxSy4bjkqjS/PVn SzMA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuaEQ5wd9EasNoXYVnGH1piWjCll8mSGvssdJ7MfkONrobEPzIyu KfpTXGIxv++zzlSynslWLyDhmiGjpnAhpmz76Kt3qg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5ZoYe4KADrSZmvZlxYYCWHL1bQOC5QL3ibZlOwRbEM0czNtyt0uS1hrHouhGOmPtPK3e5a5/iahhbLaygNE0Q= X-Received: by 2002:a24:cfc4:: with SMTP id y187mr2449915itf.144.1548272037236; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:33:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190123192549.GA96060@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <20190123193001.GC75306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20190123193001.GC75306@FreeBSD.org> From: Russell Haley Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:33:46 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Website down? To: Glen Barber Cc: Brooks Davis , "freebsd-doc@freebsd.org" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 25B4587DE5 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.93 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.932,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 19:33:58 -0000 On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:30 AM Glen Barber wrote: > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 07:25:49PM +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 11:16:06AM -0800, Russell Haley wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I was attempting to view a bug in bugzilla and was unable to get to the > > > bugzilla site. I then tried to get to www.freebsd.org and was also > > > unsuccessful. > > > > > > As I can't get to the site, I didn't know who to contact so I emailed > the > > > two most relevant mailing lists I have access to. > > > > I was seeing extremely slow loads, but things seem to be back up now. > > > > Oops, I replied to Russell without CCing the lists. > > Yes, it is back now. We had a brief network disruption. > > Glen > Thanks Glen! Russ From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Jan 23 23:20:35 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D44D14B5460 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:20:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from mx31.harte-lyne.ca (mx31.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx31.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA_HLL_ISSUER_2016" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69B108FD89 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:20:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca) Received: from mx31.harte-lyne.ca (localhost [127.0.31.1]) by mx31.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8433CD8B9 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:20:19 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from mx31.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.31.1]) by mx31.harte-lyne.ca (mx31.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.31.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AFOJKo2RmFrs for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:20:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from inet17.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (inet17.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx31.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:19:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx32.harte-lyne.ca (mx32.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx32.harte-lyne.ca", Issuer "CA_HLL_ISSUER_2016" (verified OK)) by inet17.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2015D199025 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:19:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from mx32.harte-lyne.ca (unknown [127.0.32.1]) by mx32.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915A13718 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:19:47 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at harte-lyne.ca Received: from mx32.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.32.1]) by mx32.harte-lyne.ca (mx32.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.32.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1JwJdrw_NccT for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:19:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from webmail.harte-lyne.ca (mx32.harte-lyne.ca [216.185.71.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx32.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 63CA9370C for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:19:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from 216.185.71.44 (SquirrelMail authenticated user byrnejb_hll) by webmail.harte-lyne.ca with HTTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:19:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1bdea92a0cedc17cc49187c01d49b94f.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 18:19:32 -0500 Subject: PF filter rule for LAN to LAN ssh traffic From: "James B. Byrne" To: freebsd-questions@harte-lyne.ca Reply-To: byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 69B108FD89 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.81 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:216.185.71.0/26]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[harte-lyne.ca:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[harte-lyne.ca,quarantine]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx31.harte-lyne.ca,mx132.harte-lyne.ca]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-1.80)[ipnet: 216.185.64.0/20(-4.95), asn: 12021(-3.96), country: CA(-0.09)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS(0.00)[freebsd-questions@harte-lyne.ca,freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12021, ipnet:216.185.64.0/20, country:CA]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[harte-lyne.ca:s=dkim_hll]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DOM_EQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[harte-lyne.ca.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.4.1]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[9] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 23:20:35 -0000 What is the PF filter rule to permit ssh between hosts on the LAN side of a gateway firewall? When I ssh to a host the intitial connection works fine. But, after a few seconds the session becomes non-responsive and is eventually dropped with this message Fssh_packet_write_wait: Connection to 192.168.216.18 port 22: Broken pipe I tried various formulations of this: pass in log on $int_if \ from $int_if:network \ to $int_if:network keep state pass out log on $int_if \ from $int_if:network \ to $int_if:network keep state None of which worked. -- *** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** Do NOT transmit sensitive data via e-Mail Do NOT open attachments nor follow links sent by e-Mail James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB@Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 06:04:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B9414C39CA for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 06:04:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SAMI@info.szwgroup.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8973582F0C for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 06:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SAMI@info.szwgroup.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4DC7214C39C9; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 06:04:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095E614C39C8 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 06:04:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SAMI@info.szwgroup.com) Received: from mx177.edm.easidm.com (mx177.edm.easidm.com [118.192.64.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C81182F08 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 06:04:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SAMI@info.szwgroup.com) From: =?utf-8?B?U0FNSSAyMDE5?= To: Reply-To: Subject: =?utf-8?B?5LiN6Imv6LWE5Lqn56iz5Lit5pyJ5Y2HIOS6n+mcgOaPkOWNh+acieaViOWkhOe9ruaJi+autSBJdCBpcyB1cmdlbnQgdG8gaW1wcm92ZSBlZmZlY3RpdmUgbWVhc3VyZXMgdG8gZGVhbCB3aXRoIG5vbi1wZXJmb3JtaW5nIGFzc2V0cw==?= X-EASEYEUID: 8070228-127921-625-6427 Precedence: bulk X-Easeye-ExpirationDate: 2019-01-31 13:35:25 X-PRECENDENCE: 0 X-Easeye-MailSeq: 45 X-DELAYHEADER: 0-0-1-0 Message-Id: <20190124054830.25EF75D35C4@mx177.edm.easidm.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:48:30 +0800 (CST) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 5C81182F08 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of SAMI@info.szwgroup.com designates 118.192.64.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=SAMI@info.szwgroup.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.70 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[brucez@szwgroup.com]; FROM_EXCESS_BASE64(1.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:118.192.64.0/24]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx8.gmail.easeye.com.cn]; MIME_BASE64_TEXT(0.10)[]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(0.21)[asn: 4847(1.00), country: CN(0.04)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:4847, ipnet:118.192.64.0/19, country:CN]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.40)[-0.398,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; PRECEDENCE_BULK(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[szwgroup.com]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.12)[0.120,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.69)[0.689,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[177.64.192.118.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; MIME_HTML_ONLY(0.20)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 06:04:36 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 14:35:10 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 969FF14B1A39 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from usr.src.linux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x234.google.com (mail-lj1-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FE446DB39 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:35:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from usr.src.linux@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x234.google.com with SMTP id x85-v6so5444927ljb.2 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 06:35:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NSoNQsO4WWm9xDXunCjXKMVS3+pORjn3E4aKTtLqTxw=; b=eOtc7Sr1N2Qm3wnOmryKDfK4nG7qfnN9ShR4F3Al4E7dNDzxQ5Vtwppd71S4FglQD2 MUlVz1jEFyJrZke4Y7DXsL8b21m03/pTaH1IUliCcWZkKdN3ZXLWZGJqLD/FUNaNUMPK s1MPB22Afjp6bQIhoBEy63M8gKtK5buUfmlxVh5qvmojv/Cv704z1vDNeR1oaiMMM950 IYgp0+cktyvyFPSoFuKVB1DyTGZz7vGtugw+bIkaA6dzjAujEw3sjRE59XIlF+hQoTgR ZMT4M4p4Eox9GDXb7rBBWjTgmY16S58Br7Q5cMb2ogr0RxfLWhGXp6TWYlaIgUWnEQjP er1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NSoNQsO4WWm9xDXunCjXKMVS3+pORjn3E4aKTtLqTxw=; b=NFP3zNg64sJ+To6959WS0YRwwtvDHQk7SN4li03+2DZkVn3V1OVw584Zu4x0rQUoAn Srz38dL3CNHGSGzvEF3udH6oXJUi/i0UJ8oH6LaxTmjtxxs60NRIFDsirHP4VUVoJ/tQ rDrggkt+iV2KhXJtcQ8hmFLpHW93eNSs7/AWAJz8RxSbKi983eW3joFqIRiXlVUdfJXf iV58u3+JuNRF0i7eykbVrRl3R+6T955j7wycaStx4iHYiml2BBSkQ5BTN2KmBzC18AGC txi0OEJ7ztRJMfyQ1xaFpGz3d5OD4rerxi1MrzG3qH6ZvXuMbrsPeHQjDjGX+RhogqAB IAfg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcSo+zL/o/5MWM1tLtnzSrSkhgmAZZDS2kV/eFO9yfmmRVd693P bMiDg7WUFwHpWMq8ExNGmi+C5rzxl30ejAptL5REiw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN6ZUy7Tv3SbzCCmOVhA8BySRPovPTnNUu+NEjYhpCbdTzsC4GBLE412vILFFRcXRYsQJz+IAXE5jFPEd8xciH8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9cd5:: with SMTP id g21-v6mr5760092ljj.48.1548340508254; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 06:35:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190123131308.39221e51@curlew> In-Reply-To: <20190123131308.39221e51@curlew> From: Harry Duncan Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:34:55 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Kmail using 100% cpu To: Mike Clarke Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8FE446DB39 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=eOtc7Sr1; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of usrsrclinux@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::234 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=usrsrclinux@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.61 / 15.00]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.956,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[4.3.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(-2.64)[ip: (-9.01), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.21), asn: 15169(-1.91), country: US(-0.08)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:35:10 -0000 Long time since I have used Kmail, but I had the same problem when using offline imap on an account with 10gb of email in it, once I deleted that account from the config it operated fine. On Wed, Jan 23, 2019 at 1:18 PM Mike Clarke wrote: > Kmail has started to consume 100% cpu. It works OK for the first few > seconds after starting but then goes 100% cpu bound and is totally > unresponsive. I've never seen this problem with kmail in the past. > > I've tried clearing the akonadi cache but that made no difference. > > FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE-p7 > kmail-18.12.1_1 > akonadi-18.12.1_1 > > Any suggestions how to go about fixing this problem? > > -- > Mike Clarke > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 17:22:41 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B39BB14B6849 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:22:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM03-CO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092007039.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.7.39]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F80D742B6 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:22:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=sM7e/1TwvxURSj4sTfqMFK7q2JMPIp+1reVFispiXB8=; b=GMk1ZP7bmuRx3sB6J+BVLEnWUDP+x/iRHsDuhSx/arMtv5mg8y3tqcVbE1KgRxtYwq3xxHhFTImWzWPzT9I3CHZoZrbfulUFvmm2JVYu4PjKI4jouSGnAgVKFwfqokwc9QaFjrgrZVpgqNqzOrtXZsG4PfXPEjX6hetEUYwC+TmKQ8vIG+yU86y9ooMAS2+ZUS9PpAQ8mBZyMPAKvoXsjpm2Ejl/cd6AB0g2eTg3qS8n58/DYQ/3a7BdGIAtzyhogw2pA8kRx7PtfbM1MQzcPxG6tbIUH2L3KAtiQorM3MwGw/9q/ceZckBD2Q32QXKWTMpClaJGCqr9elbBSfg4OA== Received: from BY2NAM03FT010.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.56) by BY2NAM03HT147.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.85.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:22:38 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.84.55) by BY2NAM03FT010.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.84.122) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:22:38 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a]) by MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a%11]) with mapi id 15.20.1558.016; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:22:38 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Subject: Wireless interface Thread-Topic: Wireless interface Thread-Index: AQHUtAlnpLyouHF10EGiifEuwf8DKQ== Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:22:37 +0000 Message-ID: Reply-To: FreeBSD Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BN8PR12CA0012.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:408:60::25) To MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:72::8) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:1EFD0772E8EDF80501F63FC42CDF1D1A1FE00653347508BD40805DD26D06E4EB; UpperCasedChecksum:DCA6BEA6DEE8E897A7EB80265ACB5134BA7C3E08EA0D4890BEB25CAF0B668438; SizeAsReceived:8401; Count:64 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [dKdv+ME6hrjYhO8RaEIAJcw2XRAyxYoxmPFjFBu8c8U=] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20190124122232.00003204@outlook.com> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY2NAM03HT147; 6:3RDVPe/ao1aRbviG2AbU32icFYDrsGiuVu3ZhzuEHo3KoMkmQzGmB8WRsnYxcUi9HXumCMu8Os4O5CZGB4yoomO3Ut9uih1xmk0DYycIAlHAyQvCOIzVpkzh0mN9elcDViRXgF3CQ39Sytij58sfSQFmaU4a4kZCtNTvCkrYwAg4iXluj/m+0fr9Rt/oo/YiNhQUX7JoR6/JaR/dr0Hm0Xq1oVEaxVvd1KClKlcn9sQEyQ4NjTuyAUsRuo6yz0VAHpsNCYCK/h0AZKk4QR7MLtlojCSWOjZkSFjSurr/l7ouP3bLhGo8fSIzzMCbBlGT2yZhTBJ7swt8fwqhXv0MwXcOxevlaKn7BMAStKJZkw5NVDnxJ0xE4TuEOFyh4oScBnPW/01RH1GCXxAVBVH2xrZkuHCzKMY3Pn6yf7n/Hx4FFq6DgIwMokpGPTH+e/sgp07vADfOral5AKzdMCxJIw==; 5:TWFhPimKgzkFFMSjytU5Onky9RslJGsA0PUfP2P44A7osqySiK2xiEBeC/FDdCYmPIyZOifoNoJEWHeVG9Nh833lzEeKQg5AqL+BmqkG6pb1+1/TIjw3aC7nrd24CKyiZROr4rTtpG6mHVHC6vvGv02f9eEus8VHQHpBVNKsBLsh2ZtfpNj+RUMKRxiE9rW0qDPVqM2EXUGZ+I40oMopKA==; 7:l89VRP8CfB63UmNqw9+xPDyLf2FIJ+z0nKNJSvt5s1WVKUDZSMIvhgmBf1uTvutXg6ouLjAUl3meuSel6IJrwj57DbRV3cE2nSwPbXH7QWlVZCEggQHN2D/HDE+4sJCFwP5tAT5s+SjS7pitweVKBw== x-incomingheadercount: 64 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(20181119070)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031323274)(2017031324274)(2017031322404)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT147; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BY2NAM03HT147: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4566010)(82015058); SRVR:BY2NAM03HT147; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY2NAM03HT147; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: tIs4uAH2QIaMJWCq9z+q3qC4BVN6ckCxEZQDDrt85P8YDxtWTfIxCdPDoQskINyp Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <1E08EE4BBA3300438C8568044206A05D@namprd04.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: d79ef70f-6ea6-4c73-f786-08d68220890e X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Jan 2019 17:22:36.8446 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY2NAM03HT147 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6F80D742B6 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=GMk1ZP7b; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 40.92.7.39 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.10 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.925,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/14]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.961,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[39.7.92.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.01)[-0.009,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:22:41 -0000 Okay, I had some free time today, so I decided to try and get the wireless interface up and running on my FreeBSD 12.0 / amd 64 machine. I thought I correctly configured the "wpa_supplicant.conf" file and entered the correct into into the "/etc/rc.conf" file, but it is still not working correctly. Anyway, this is the output when I attempt to restart= the network. # service netif restart Stopping dhclient. dhclient not running? (check /var/run/dhclient/dhclient.wlan0.pid). Stopping Network: lo0 em0 wlan0. lo0: flags=3D8048 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3D680003 groups: lo nd6 options=3D21 em0: flags=3D8c02 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=3D81249b ether 00:1a:a0:89:ca:e4 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active nd6 options=3D21 wlan0: flags=3D8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:1b:fc:81:85:7f groups: wlan ssid Scorpio-2g channel 3 (2422 MHz 11g) regdomain FCC country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 30 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) status: no carrier nd6 options=3D29 Destroyed wlan(4) interfaces: wlan0. Created wlan(4) interfaces: wlan0. sendmsg on em0: Permission denied sendmsg on em0: Permission denied sendmsg on em0: Permission denied Starting Network: lo0 em0 wlan0. lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3D680003 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 groups: lo nd6 options=3D21 em0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=3D81249b ether 00:1a:a0:89:ca:e4 inet6 fe80::21a:a0ff:fe89:cae4%em0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.0.101 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active nd6 options=3D23 wlan0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:1b:fc:81:85:7f groups: wlan ssid Scorpio-2g channel 9 (2452 MHz 11g) regdomain FCC country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 30 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS bintval 0 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) status: no carrier nd6 options=3D29 The "/var/run/dhclient/dhclient.wlan0.pid" exists, so I am not sure what that error message is all about. Plus, I have no idea what the "sendmsg on em0: Permission denied" repeated three times is referring to. The "wpa_supplicant.conf file: network=3D{ ssid=3D"Scorpio-2g" scan_ssid=3D1 key_mgmt=3DWPA-PSK psk=3D"SECRET" } >From the "/etc/rc.conf file": ## Wireless wlans_bwi0=3D"wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0=3D"ssid Scorpio-2g DHCP" the "dmesg" output for this device: bwi0: mem 0xfdefe000-0xfdefffff i= rq 16 at device 1.0 on pci2 bwi0: BBP: id 0x4318, rev 0x2, pkg 0 bwi0: MAC: rev 9 bwi0: PHY: type 2, rev 7, ver 3 bwi0: RF: manu 0x17f, type 0x2050, rev 8 bwi0: invalid antenna gain in sprom It is situations like this that make me love Microsoft. Connecting a wireless network should not require user intervention other than choosing the network and entering the password. --=20 Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 19:11:39 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E360814BAA2A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:11:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3F7181B7E for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from luzar722@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id c2so5650949iom.12 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:11:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mo6hwpeiZf82ySYS6uK7E0vWJa5I8MBKMXty5+7cH7I=; b=d+iqxxRbxwVoBxsbCDe2tdpj6ATSKPDWP1uOSRFiPnCHLuMFeAPWrHCUBQyZv0Pa7E 7n5MLGj68tYi2SU+18WVfxRoug3PfCL7jIV/mDA+rq6IuDBKmjzoPD8HeHCRPr7B4NIF 2jdUQGDI6vt7zDrkzlkuvy/8Uq/r8FE1ZkkEYXChWCVKAFMDlXjG8AsSOvb0Zq0gVUre r2OHCfIj6/aOAYVHjovphQH+d3vwi+QxU5FnP13y54aBnJDzyzsAPhdDhDS5fmPM6D2m yA2l14hKqst+v2lQ6H6PSLy9NiwzqQ55GHcgVZWIB3+Tf4cvmZaV76ZcOwRf60nUcPa5 T8wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mo6hwpeiZf82ySYS6uK7E0vWJa5I8MBKMXty5+7cH7I=; b=VizaeMssWOs3BKPBxxt6r8kgZzXGLtjn3oslExhOHnnm5TC3ODmAQGgNWjblyG9LOM QuknwVTJQPIUaxDvrjeH91ItfDjpkhjzgbxsJTT3+W/v+UYPtPe3OIVc5O2rOEY/ih8W xwFbfmoxa9w++a5G7F8/Gy66/yzJquZ+o9PW0fZ29ONQ4FmWJFApWzITd0Y5d19jrZhx 0eWvI3oj+otK3QbCxuIBLDfClYfZ7MmikqrXwr2z4jd4LZ/r0XWb9O7uj0HQ2YhgGr8R QmE9K49HcHM4l0IY9Znj3heOhzTih9s8XxS+lUFLXJZ3rZ7KLfIpUq6tESHVouXDze5W wKhA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdm9sjh0AxGcbFIWiUB1UWfSylCvRosM0ZoNfVBIZCztdtHVZ7C qugxfizAN6u9F0jy2MXwK1ffAc3x X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IYHsPueUTDcUh71vyhaCzpR/9P46GjIM3or9wytJd+FG9pNqECWtmUggS03ZeKMbi5uYEIoZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:38d7:: with SMTP id f206mr4496037ioa.265.1548357096902; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:11:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.10.8] (cpe-65-25-53-210.neo.res.rr.com. [65.25.53.210]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f10sm11156348itf.41.2019.01.24.11.11.35 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 11:11:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5C4A0DE8.1070602@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:11:36 -0500 From: Ernie Luzar User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Wireless interface References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: F3F7181B7E X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=d+iqxxRb; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of luzar722@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=luzar722@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.64 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.91)[-0.909,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.72)[ip: (-9.11), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.49), asn: 15169(-1.91), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[f.2.d.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:11:39 -0000 Carmel NY wrote: > Okay, I had some free time today, so I decided to try and get the > wireless interface up and running on my FreeBSD 12.0 / amd 64 machine. > I thought I correctly configured the "wpa_supplicant.conf" file and > entered the correct into into the "/etc/rc.conf" file, but it is still > not working correctly. Anyway, this is the output when I attempt to restart the > network. > > # service netif restart > Stopping dhclient. > dhclient not running? (check /var/run/dhclient/dhclient.wlan0.pid). > Stopping Network: lo0 em0 wlan0. > lo0: flags=8048 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=680003 > groups: lo > nd6 options=21 > em0: flags=8c02 metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=81249b > ether 00:1a:a0:89:ca:e4 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > nd6 options=21 > wlan0: flags=8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether 00:1b:fc:81:85:7f > groups: wlan > ssid Scorpio-2g channel 3 (2422 MHz 11g) > regdomain FCC country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 30 > bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 > roam:rate 5 protmode CTS > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) > status: no carrier > nd6 options=29 > Destroyed wlan(4) interfaces: wlan0. > Created wlan(4) interfaces: wlan0. > sendmsg on em0: Permission denied > sendmsg on em0: Permission denied > sendmsg on em0: Permission denied > Starting Network: lo0 em0 wlan0. > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=680003 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > groups: lo > nd6 options=21 > em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 > options=81249b > ether 00:1a:a0:89:ca:e4 inet6 fe80::21a:a0ff:fe89:cae4%em0 prefixlen > 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.0.101 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast > 192.168.0.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > nd6 options=23 > wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 ether 00:1b:fc:81:85:7f > groups: wlan > ssid Scorpio-2g channel 9 (2452 MHz 11g) > regdomain FCC country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 30 > bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 > roam:rate 5 protmode CTS bintval 0 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) > status: no carrier > nd6 options=29 > > The "/var/run/dhclient/dhclient.wlan0.pid" exists, so I am not sure > what that error message is all about. Plus, I have no idea what the > "sendmsg on em0: Permission denied" repeated three times is referring > to. > > The "wpa_supplicant.conf file: > network={ > ssid="Scorpio-2g" > scan_ssid=1 > key_mgmt=WPA-PSK > psk="SECRET" > } > >>From the "/etc/rc.conf file": > ## Wireless > wlans_bwi0="wlan0" > ifconfig_wlan0="ssid Scorpio-2g DHCP" > > the "dmesg" output for this device: > bwi0: mem 0xfdefe000-0xfdefffff irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci2 > bwi0: BBP: id 0x4318, rev 0x2, pkg 0 > bwi0: MAC: rev 9 > bwi0: PHY: type 2, rev 7, ver 3 > bwi0: RF: manu 0x17f, type 0x2050, rev 8 > bwi0: invalid antenna gain in sprom > > It is situations like this that make me love > Microsoft. Connecting a wireless network should not require user > intervention other than choosing the network and entering the password. > I had this problem when I followed the handbook instructions for configuring a wifi card I plugged into my machine back in January 2017. Through trial and error with a lot of tcpdump logs finally figured out that; my firewall was blocking a igmp packet to 224.0.0.22. Whats happening is the wifi device on the host is trying to verify that the wifi device has public internet access as part of the start up process. It tries 3 times and then gives up without issuing any meaningful error message. Be aware that the wifi setup info in the handbook is very out dated. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 19:34:56 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E0614BBB5A for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:34:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from donald.charles@stardataleads.com) Received: from a2nlsmtp01-01.prod.iad2.secureserver.net (a2nlsmtp01-01.prod.iad2.secureserver.net [198.71.224.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "relay-hosting.secureserver.net", Issuer "Starfield Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42AFB82D8C for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:34:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from donald.charles@stardataleads.com) Received: from a2plcpnl0421.prod.iad2.secureserver.net ([198.71.235.17]) by : HOSTING RELAY : with ESMTP id mkl1gSUlUXXUDmkl1gPcKj; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:33:47 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stardataleads.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date: Subject:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=EZX/gxfMhvqNVf9R4L1sgvYCYNMIoJQ+wSfGJGNmysg=; b=S92+RQIVwV5GP5G29YB7Tc9hpp kNSs0u4Gm4hPr5QBkb7KF7gV2u9TaDLyqqziHFu4YDcIoJJ4sQFpBBYSmenZNvejBTe7qMBY/F2g5 ZTW/WgcFGVGMKzzsVnuQOTms59bIMRr0IhWUKoGuqTnVdKw5AkYcyUS2VprVpb7qJcddA0TTWoJCi gfoQM+Txnyd7BQrJrdAWW+iSdnJkBprbIN9cbseyJ2IUc5Xtd0fPdm+Kg9t0hVKcN7fVjyxpZn7rr fd5rzU95rqI/8v5YkSJHQd8pEWtgbPg/oyp6zo7Hfe18O2iVYp3WPXlyIF+nMu5tuoMdZMeZmrTn9 lENE0Mog==; Received: from [106.200.205.135] (port=51236 helo=AdminPC) by a2plcpnl0421.prod.iad2.secureserver.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1gmkNQ-00GmQY-61 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:09:24 -0700 From: "Donald Charles" To: Subject: =?us-ascii?Q?Southern_California_Linux_Expo_-_SCALE_-_2019?= Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:08:25 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdS0GCvL4ouTbac+QpCvJiCBxl0S+w== Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - a2plcpnl0421.prod.iad2.secureserver.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - stardataleads.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: a2plcpnl0421.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: authenticated_id: donald.charles@stardataleads.com X-Authenticated-Sender: a2plcpnl0421.prod.iad2.secureserver.net: donald.charles@stardataleads.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGyunbNCPn3gsLmGgaJT67BjO3BwcJyi2yLpWfqu1sA+HUIZt2LLy4hIGjeJo4jBIfYV2YrtjRo16eB/d93LISZS+n0URH8Uqg3pawkn2xKDthL/yiPX pj6uLtAJdQlebMv+pcFDdspgwpBZs11pF4ks+Aq8KNCdIGBlyEBwDOxoKuDtyS/t8MHqixNfKJfmcwd2wfC3OG6Du9MxLrmLA3HcoESkESEFKGcMVx5WGenU X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 42AFB82D8C X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none (invalid DKIM record) header.d=stardataleads.com header.s=default header.b=S92+RQIV; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of donald.charles@stardataleads.com designates 198.71.224.24 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=donald.charles@stardataleads.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.63 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MX_INVALID(0.50)[cached]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:198.71.224.0/19]; HAS_X_SOURCE(0.00)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[stardataleads.com:~]; SUBJ_EXCESS_QP(1.20)[]; HAS_X_ANTIABUSE(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[135.205.200.106.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:26496, ipnet:198.71.224.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; HAS_X_AS(0.00)[donald.charles@stardataleads.com]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.86)[0.856,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[stardataleads.com]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.96)[0.958,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(0.42)[ip: (0.97), ipnet: 198.71.224.0/21(1.08), asn: 26496(0.15), country: US(-0.08)]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.991,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[24.224.71.198.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_DKIM_PERMFAIL(0.00)[stardataleads.com:s=default]; HAS_X_GMSV(0.00)[donald.charles@stardataleads.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[24.224.71.198.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 19:34:56 -0000 Hi, Would you be interested in acquiring a list of "Southern California Linux Expo - SCALE - 2019?" We have the most updated records of attendees Contacts who are participating in this event. Please let me know your interest to send you the number of Attendees and cost. Awaiting for your reply. Best Regards, Donald Charles, Marketing and Communications. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 20:29:51 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFA514BD2DF for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from angela.medina@exhibitorlab.co) Received: from h3.fbrelay.privateemail.com (h3.fbrelay.privateemail.com [131.153.2.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.fbrelay.privateemail.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD4E8568E for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from angela.medina@exhibitorlab.co) Received: from MTA-09-3.privateemail.com (mta-09.privateemail.com [198.54.127.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h3.fbrelay.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C13080097 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:21:13 -0500 (EST) Received: from MTA-09.privateemail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by MTA-09.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1E26004F for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 15:21:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from userPC (unknown [10.20.151.213]) by MTA-09.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 09B0660041 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:21:02 +0000 (UTC) From: "Angela Medina" To: Subject: 17th Annual Southern California Linux Expo 2019 Attendees List Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 01:50:42 +0530 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdS0Ikcxg6PHRg2fQ2a/MSa5AYRVig== Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DAD4E8568E X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of angela.medina@exhibitorlab.co designates 131.153.2.44 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=angela.medina@exhibitorlab.co X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.15 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.92)[-0.918,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:131.153.2.44]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.989,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.09)[0.086,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx2.privateemail.com]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[exhibitorlab.co]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[44.2.153.131.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[country: US(-0.08)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:19437, ipnet:131.153.0.0/21, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:29:51 -0000 Hi, I am following up to confirm, if you are interested in acquiring the attendees list. 17th Annual Southern California Linux Expo 2019 07 Mar - 10 Mar 2019 Pasadena, California, USA Total Count: 4,360 Let me know your thoughts so that I can send cost & additional information. Regards, Angela Medina - Sr. Business Analyst Unsub From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 20:39:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902EC14BDC82 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scopensource@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01EB986115 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scopensource@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B5C2714BDC81; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9337814BDC80 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:39:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scopensource@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x431.google.com (mail-wr1-x431.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::431]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E32A86113 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:39:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scopensource@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x431.google.com with SMTP id p4so7968334wrt.7 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:39:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=AcV5eR4ZLe0HB8KAWjulW6/Ryx55Vj4lhPcBcK5XHgU=; b=UobMXSY1z36ljH1amudZPI1JhhCcapKseZbmRANZwu67S/6jvkPqUkivB15tTJPTzf xjMIxgazJLF8FRjaVoc15O6Xq8EKDdIigySg4ZvlLAdwSrTFjHLYkBjH5r4q6JbH/VLW O5/jUL1WydjqjHyzPL9I5eP4TwBeXDV+yxHwgx/UyUGXaHvK4NkCYgjtuY7EyKsRiarw w2wWHzlOw6pIfeIswfbQDoOmSvJ3qSI9PAw+hKzQ2eDyMSerMsKiXe27Wv2bOVys6gId bkQ+tusr5sGm6pNjiaIxneIyK1rBf6s/Cd1rvbbZve7tvXVIXPc6mg41ZTAfVh6XMiSR 60wA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=AcV5eR4ZLe0HB8KAWjulW6/Ryx55Vj4lhPcBcK5XHgU=; b=FGxSA8cFxk6bcLMKyh/SZZ2VcE9XAXO+aYlyvUcXn7p65FT8dnzD6fFmKz2b9gw+RP OiRQrmhWPjrNh61zE84udYepjlSmIowWGiz+xnsyjXVRVGsqDRIU1Vrbp4WEIMVk2gEr BiJG+RJhj3MIhlWZXk+TIhmDo4GeDPtC2PobOijW/hGXKr62p7dXIvFInTgzs0mBUyNq uf7qbyF8j0icIYSMBIgdRzS5/iSfghUtAsr1u2WOfoN7ZovY+vnYq4i8+AKpeC9cVB9A 1iitz7vK5q6FiyD5mhyCKcrDoybqWlUM1UOZBn1UMFllR7C3kzReyI4xL8RBEF216tf4 DTAw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukcfHgpC09o465H6RgYxQ36ckgD5uxDB+UEo+KT9lVo3bIMHnWUm 3vsB+6U7+0TmiDwjRWcpFPZtwLgx X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN59pbpsh485HPOWZSpFc5f33AtXEfy2NC/iu+P42UguufS3moPwiZOjZXsuAJdtqw5JMT690w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:94e4:: with SMTP id 91mr9056056wrr.322.1548362391909; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:39:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (cpc120314-reig6-2-0-cust190.6-3.cable.virginm.net. [86.8.46.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm5963512wrt.82.2019.01.24.12.39.50 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 12:39:51 -0800 (PST) To: questions@freebsd.org From: Simon Connah Subject: Building a FreeBSD switch with commodity hardware Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:39:51 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-GB X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6E32A86113 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UobMXSY1; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of scopensource@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::431 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=scopensource@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.59 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.90)[-0.896,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.69)[ip: (-9.22), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.22), asn: 15169(-1.91), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.3.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:39:55 -0000 Hi everyone, First of all I am not a networking wizard so would appreciate a little help to see if my plan is achievable. I need a 1U switch to put in a datacentre and due to my familiarity with FreeBSD I thought building a switch based on FreeBSD would be the perfect solution but I'm not sure what the hardware requirements would be. I have 10 to 20 1gbps Ethernet devices to connect to the switch and a single 1gbps uplink to the rest of the internet. I'd like to be able to configure VLANs, allocate IPv4 and IPv6 addresses to individual machines and use FreeBSD as a firewall for the whole process. I also want to be able to expand my system at a later date if I need to be able to handle more devices on the local network so I'd need to be able to hook the two networks together somehow. What I'm not sure about is what hardware specs I'll need for this. What kind of CPU and RAM will I require and which Ethernet cards should I get? This is not a project that requires 100% up time but realiability is important during certain hours of the day. I'd appreciate some advice. If you need any more information then let me know and I'll try and provide it. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 20:58:21 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C7614BE487 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from louisk@cryptomonkeys.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FB786C85 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from louisk@cryptomonkeys.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7F4E114BE486; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4495A14BE485 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from louisk@cryptomonkeys.org) Received: from mail.cryptomonkeys.com (mail.cryptomonkeys.com [206.189.203.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC1886C84 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:58:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from louisk@cryptomonkeys.org) Received: from mail.cryptomonkeys.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cryptomonkeys.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A367592E; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cryptomonkeys.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cryptomonkeys.com (mail.cryptomonkeys.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aQZFMd8xgS5S; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:57:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:550:6600::42:6709] (unknown [IPv6:2001:550:6600::42:6709]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cryptomonkeys.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 129B775945; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:57:34 +0000 (UTC) From: Louis Kowolowski Message-Id: <82D113C6-EC50-40D6-B341-21B9D91205D2@cryptomonkeys.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) Subject: Re: Building a FreeBSD switch with commodity hardware Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:57:34 -0600 In-Reply-To: Cc: questions@freebsd.org To: Simon Connah References: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DEC1886C84 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.981,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 20:58:22 -0000 I think you'll see better performance if you go with an actual network = device. If you don't need something that is under contract, something = like a juniper ex4200 can be had on ebay for ~$100. 24/48 1g ports. = supports vlans, ipv6 just fine. also has firewall capabilities, but = they're not stateful.=20 If you want to hook 2 layer 2 networks together, you'll need a router. = If you just want to make the layer 2 network bigger, you can get another = switch. If you cascade too many switches, you'll find performance goes = down, not to mention single points of failure and/or bottlenecks in = performance. > On Jan 24, 2019, at 2:39 PM, Simon Connah = wrote: >=20 > Hi everyone, >=20 > First of all I am not a networking wizard so would appreciate a little = help to see if my plan is achievable. >=20 > I need a 1U switch to put in a datacentre and due to my familiarity = with FreeBSD I thought building a switch based on FreeBSD would be the = perfect solution but I'm not sure what the hardware requirements would = be. I have 10 to 20 1gbps Ethernet devices to connect to the switch and = a single 1gbps uplink to the rest of the internet. >=20 > I'd like to be able to configure VLANs, allocate IPv4 and IPv6 = addresses to individual machines and use FreeBSD as a firewall for the = whole process. I also want to be able to expand my system at a later = date if I need to be able to handle more devices on the local network so = I'd need to be able to hook the two networks together somehow. >=20 > What I'm not sure about is what hardware specs I'll need for this. = What kind of CPU and RAM will I require and which Ethernet cards should = I get? This is not a project that requires 100% up time but realiability = is important during certain hours of the day. >=20 > I'd appreciate some advice. If you need any more information then let = me know and I'll try and provide it. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Louis Kowolowski louisk@cryptomonkeys.org = Cryptomonkeys: = http://www.cryptomonkeys.com/ Making life more interesting for people since 1977 From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 21:13:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8235B14BEB4C for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:13:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092006096.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.6.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA53C8754C for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:13:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=GlVCFXc6QSsrTG99vgNZ643N7aiCaJdr0ucwtVesuIA=; b=m+YuuVB+qTV7i1PihrZFiN9oH6TNl82CfjF/7JAeTWEk9pSB15IccunlDybOsTkSiJgK38Xk6duzNa88aXzxQnBtEK7wNwBGZzIXe1n0i4Hgug8V1ZMzCSoFVSoC0wFJlhAe9L9wHIBZd1IzfchzW0RINLn3wiKCAKjNSuFH3Ho84g+uRY7asZ/A/xcNvMj/Y/Ge4hcI7R/EnL+rXIaTJAQ4OSQSyT9k7r1paD8X4Ata/ETwYbBHxFmnXz7QKe/lhVqZDPget28Dcubm+4dUcZLt/bPYedKZ/w5NEk4flcx1y368OtZqxyxL3WBetEjY4pvdVowOM4lJ6jK6zuKqog== Received: from DM3NAM03FT041.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.82.51) by DM3NAM03HT184.eop-NAM03.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.61) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:13:21 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.82.55) by DM3NAM03FT041.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.83.207) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.1558.11 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:13:21 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a]) by MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a%11]) with mapi id 15.20.1558.016; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:13:21 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Wireless interface Thread-Topic: Wireless interface Thread-Index: AQHUtAlnpLyouHF10EGiifEuwf8DKQ== Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:13:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: <5C4A0DE8.1070602@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5C4A0DE8.1070602@gmail.com> Reply-To: FreeBSD Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BN6PR12CA0037.namprd12.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:405:70::23) To MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:72::8) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:A64F22FDAF1E79B5F83A456370D555C350FB0E0B7C7EF83F5AE10397C1CA341A; UpperCasedChecksum:C56375E55E70BBB79481D3F9EC370D3C1209593472D7AB45FEB2699040A36ACC; SizeAsReceived:8573; Count:66 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [Wvt5MIzb9bZui0NVKnS6xS5/HasrH+pUY4tIQFH+cEY=] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20190124161315.00001a35@outlook.com> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM3NAM03HT184; 6:jxlfioedvnR1xNe20bc+wpAeJGtVyUoyBMCyliClCDQUK+VXKU/eU5Kygd332RJDL0FHsB1l/XQFYO+Uqpr38PlORrIIZcIKj4mAtpKYgoQOaLJgFyA51muEmOTmzoaOAziK1q4j/+gscprpL7qA/a2pJMLWehsqBVawUBd6WvstrFbd1G7Jt6+7XiyzKKMzgHGo6OO3zZxJ8hrfelHFy3vo4JuyG1EyCX+fEv42RSq+zRk+Ka+cK1Ls5yU1FTIYKP47+LETyLeb74KHi0SZ+S9ktB4O8MBXIhhT3H5hVKJrQX8VQyZvlAFWgbUAqrmWKrgvmVKWKCijL3F0A9g3IKZb8yJM6qpu9I90lZiqMoFt1RFKgXGw/G/3cxIL2n53tkhJEREdcidL23mS/Duzo0523auojzhHbWy4WuIsFd/+Pkq//gTxgk1of3mR9VNAHtKxLiMC3j1BGzecWfmbLA==; 5:E6bapxGOYXeAexIBPEP7LLHEYFYFW2gI1twQXWF/9prOIGBJH0fd32K+L+PiIhF9WBLm/MlLLj9OLBwD5YYvgb3g8/2Kq7Ubo/am8s/C2HzzfFsU/a6NrtH00U5YmTBzfI/lQfnpLuWNOLE/tYJzSfro4iOAZV8sVoXB8QD8/5X5HxO9FahicyOj9CZuKsm34sJ6wkzuta1RYv3tzDzwuA==; 7:AcRxGz1LUyN4EosOtfQSFzwslMy78NklV0T9mNbo1lPURp9vqB95ZuK6fRQ3TQDY5m09ySXC1e2VRGR0EUbPzpizN5NOVsd0D1gSZxp1buradP12D7pjnHoXas0eH7ql3sn94FQqPIBVpup/Q8cEHA== x-incomingheadercount: 66 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(20181119070)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031323274)(2017031324274)(2017031322404)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:DM3NAM03HT184; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM3NAM03HT184: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4566010)(82015058); SRVR:DM3NAM03HT184; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM3NAM03HT184; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: HyTVB+XW3DyBDdWNp3PNyDt3WOjcIi9iuE/4M2L+pUQqUw1WfTnGISL0ukBommj+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 41f2b452-c1d0-4b91-d3d1-08d68240c43b X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Jan 2019 21:13:20.0185 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM3NAM03HT184 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EA53C8754C X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=m+YuuVB+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 40.92.6.96 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.60 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/14]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.90)[-0.902,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.951,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.47)[0.466,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[96.6.92.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:13:24 -0000 On Thu, 24 Jan 2019 14:11:36 -0500, Ernie Luzar stated: >Carmel NY wrote: >> Okay, I had some free time today, so I decided to try and get the >> wireless interface up and running on my FreeBSD 12.0 / amd 64 >> machine. I thought I correctly configured the "wpa_supplicant.conf" >> file and entered the correct into into the "/etc/rc.conf" file, but >> it is still not working correctly. Anyway, this is the output when I >> attempt to restart the network. >>=20 >> # service netif restart >> Stopping dhclient. >> dhclient not running? (check /var/run/dhclient/dhclient.wlan0.pid). >> Stopping Network: lo0 em0 wlan0. >> lo0: flags=3D8048 metric 0 mtu 16384 >> options=3D680003 >> groups: lo >> nd6 options=3D21 >> em0: flags=3D8c02 metric 0 mtu >> 1500 >> options=3D81249b >> ether 00:1a:a0:89:ca:e4 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX >> ) status: active >> nd6 options=3D21 >> wlan0: flags=3D8802 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> ether 00:1b:fc:81:85:7f >> groups: wlan >> ssid Scorpio-2g channel 3 (2422 MHz 11g) >> regdomain FCC country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 30 >> bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 >> roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS >> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) >> status: no carrier >> nd6 options=3D29 >> Destroyed wlan(4) interfaces: wlan0. >> Created wlan(4) interfaces: wlan0. >> sendmsg on em0: Permission denied >> sendmsg on em0: Permission denied >> sendmsg on em0: Permission denied >> Starting Network: lo0 em0 wlan0. >> lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 >> options=3D680003 >> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x2 >> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >> groups: lo >> nd6 options=3D21 >> em0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu >> 1500 >> options=3D81249b >> ether 00:1a:a0:89:ca:e4 inet6 fe80::21a:a0ff:fe89:cae4%em0 prefixlen >> 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 192.168.0.101 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast >> 192.168.0.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active >> nd6 options=3D23 >> wlan0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 >> mtu 1500 ether 00:1b:fc:81:85:7f >> groups: wlan >> ssid Scorpio-2g channel 9 (2452 MHz 11g) >> regdomain FCC country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 30 >> bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 >> roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS bintval 0 >> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) >> status: no carrier >> nd6 options=3D29 >>=20 >> The "/var/run/dhclient/dhclient.wlan0.pid" exists, so I am not sure >> what that error message is all about. Plus, I have no idea what the >> "sendmsg on em0: Permission denied" repeated three times is referring >> to. >>=20 >> The "wpa_supplicant.conf file: >> network=3D{ >> ssid=3D"Scorpio-2g" >> scan_ssid=3D1 >> key_mgmt=3DWPA-PSK >> psk=3D"SECRET" >> } >> =20 >>>From the "/etc/rc.conf file": =20 >> ## Wireless >> wlans_bwi0=3D"wlan0" >> ifconfig_wlan0=3D"ssid Scorpio-2g DHCP" >>=20 >> the "dmesg" output for this device: >> bwi0: mem >> 0xfdefe000-0xfdefffff irq 16 at device 1.0 on pci2 bwi0: BBP: id >> 0x4318, rev 0x2, pkg 0 bwi0: MAC: rev 9 >> bwi0: PHY: type 2, rev 7, ver 3 >> bwi0: RF: manu 0x17f, type 0x2050, rev 8 >> bwi0: invalid antenna gain in sprom >>=20 >> It is situations like this that make me love >> Microsoft. Connecting a wireless network should not require user >> intervention other than choosing the network and entering the >> password.=20 > >I had this problem when I followed the handbook instructions for=20 >configuring a wifi card I plugged into my machine back in January >2017. Through trial and error with a lot of tcpdump logs finally >figured out that; my firewall was blocking a igmp packet to 224.0.0.22. > >Whats happening is the wifi device on the host is trying to verify >that the wifi device has public internet access as part of the start >up process. It tries 3 times and then gives up without issuing any=20 >meaningful error message. > >Be aware that the wifi setup info in the handbook is very out dated. Unfortunately, my playtime for this quarter is pretty much used up. Perhaps in three or four months I will revisit this issue. --=20 Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jan 24 21:23:16 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1683F14BEF00 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A8C87BA2 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2AC4C14BEEFF; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0562E14BEEFE for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:23:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi1-x230.google.com (mail-oi1-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C17C87BA0 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi1-x230.google.com with SMTP id x23so6112845oix.3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:23:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=uvmbkyD30t3nsJrQuK3QvJFwqRF9HPuNsd4iRXyf3zI=; b=iFjX57VT0O58GvP+sb1R74u0nQcWZ+3gHK58b18neDVl7h4A/2Gswf6V5snMXxDmb2 r71rWHY5lDxIPGHRlCCpvw2GpfeQjVHbX1qknnzNW1SPrU6Li4dcVmTqeDBtFhNtcKvx rP+Cr5YErV/5XC2PInvF2sXHplVlTnBMlUla6jnLV7BTuoDJwE0Y+JUU7AZ2PTCXqa9F KcWu5RcqfzAhn3PZwz7KwncUHu1mAqJ9mmzIcpuqS2a9MiXwYlvzLSAH22gt79iaFygv KdHoEHLfe8ne6yY6owYEeHee5P81R/cLQRb/7BQw3Tu7fSsThzFHJO+7bOmNsy0/6H4p uJyQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uvmbkyD30t3nsJrQuK3QvJFwqRF9HPuNsd4iRXyf3zI=; b=ZOLof6RjDaBkqsh/hb9gcYRMxi5Oqjj8yHXbvp45mgsjwopQvIbwWq4lojjD05S36p Gnbbtd0d5oysOC3T8UNebJpYfMh0jL95ltJFXlBk0jVFaDo69I3BY9U7AqTEJVOfwMtm y629X6QBdh1JrOpmN8YiKCYHOBsrGwcZICP2gaY3/G6Rc1GMmR0IjU66Z7Vds1fgJobo lg9ZokERP4BEjVAAXYdNGdSE3UI5QLmwYZ3+5+BSwfJMlEXXf0RfnrIUDkv1/RkpUd60 acPQNlHc3rUx4XZuSRuGqaVLC6ypx7erj4rD6sGMSX4+cE8cKANKJOG3VL24JsMp7bW7 IsAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukdRxEHC8Nr/w90/3oMSnA8RETl6HYNgYwbKm7rjyka9Ek4dOj4J 0Ej/7r4EoUGXMZRk1tofry3F/N0WMm060Lioyb7yOFDW X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7Cokea3yFwgiodHxmJani7bOxu7XAMZkdQAYiF1SgD6e8XqmOH4sCnD8RVaURTSlrWa3qSnWSJWqYwjLN/6lA= X-Received: by 2002:aca:bc42:: with SMTP id m63mr2224180oif.323.1548364992934; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:23:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <82D113C6-EC50-40D6-B341-21B9D91205D2@cryptomonkeys.org> In-Reply-To: <82D113C6-EC50-40D6-B341-21B9D91205D2@cryptomonkeys.org> From: "Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH" Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 13:23:01 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Building a FreeBSD switch with commodity hardware To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7C17C87BA0 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.979,0]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 21:23:16 -0000 And the cool thing is that Juniper's are FreeBSD underneath the covers! Kurt On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 1:00 PM Louis Kowolowski wrote: > > I think you'll see better performance if you go with an actual network de= vice. If you don't need something that is under contract, something like a = juniper ex4200 can be had on ebay for ~$100. 24/48 1g ports. supports vlans= , ipv6 just fine. also has firewall capabilities, but they're not stateful. > > If you want to hook 2 layer 2 networks together, you'll need a router. If= you just want to make the layer 2 network bigger, you can get another swit= ch. If you cascade too many switches, you'll find performance goes down, no= t to mention single points of failure and/or bottlenecks in performance. > > > > On Jan 24, 2019, at 2:39 PM, Simon Connah wrot= e: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > First of all I am not a networking wizard so would appreciate a little = help to see if my plan is achievable. > > > > I need a 1U switch to put in a datacentre and due to my familiarity wit= h FreeBSD I thought building a switch based on FreeBSD would be the perfect= solution but I'm not sure what the hardware requirements would be. I have = 10 to 20 1gbps Ethernet devices to connect to the switch and a single 1gbps= uplink to the rest of the internet. > > > > I'd like to be able to configure VLANs, allocate IPv4 and IPv6 addresse= s to individual machines and use FreeBSD as a firewall for the whole proces= s. I also want to be able to expand my system at a later date if I need to = be able to handle more devices on the local network so I'd need to be able = to hook the two networks together somehow. > > > > What I'm not sure about is what hardware specs I'll need for this. What= kind of CPU and RAM will I require and which Ethernet cards should I get? = This is not a project that requires 100% up time but realiability is import= ant during certain hours of the day. > > > > I'd appreciate some advice. If you need any more information then let m= e know and I'll try and provide it. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd= .org" > > -- > Louis Kowolowski louisk@cryptomonkeys.org = > Cryptomonkeys: http://www.cryptomonkeys= .com/ > > Making life more interesting for people since 1977 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 01:02:40 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66BC14C5847 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 01:02:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de) Received: from dd13304.kasserver.com (dd13304.kasserver.com [85.13.135.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DA6990488 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 01:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de) Received: from [192.168.100.8] (b9168eb6.cgn.dg-w.de [185.22.142.182]) by dd13304.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 70EA95E202DB for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:02:30 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christian Baer Subject: Support for HP 331T Message-ID: <248dcdff-5858-9463-6a19-44d0b1701c69@icerats.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 02:02:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DA6990488 X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de does not designate 85.13.135.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.70 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.41)[-0.411,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.54)[0.543,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uni-dortmund.de]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.74)[0.739,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[esa3.itmc.tu-dortmund.de,esa4.itmc.tu-dortmund.de]; IP_SCORE(0.03)[asn: 34788(0.18), country: DE(-0.01)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[53.135.13.85.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34788, ipnet:85.13.135.0/24, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 01:02:40 -0000 Hey guys! I am putting together (as in building myself) a router for "normal" routing but also as a VPN gateway. One of the main reasons for this is that my ISP doesn't supply me with a public IPv4 address and since this is the only one in the town I live in that can actually deliver anything that may be considered broadband access, I am pretty much stuck with them. I want to use pfsense or opnsense and I am currently checking out hardware. Anyways, a friend recommended I get the said 4-port network adapter because it gets the job done and isn't all that expensive (~35 EUR used on ebay). The question just is: Will it work with FreeBSD? As far as I could find out, these cards use a Broadcom BCM5719 chip - which I could not find in the FreeBSD hardware list. The bce(4) driver offers support for several chips that seem to be from the same family at least, like the BCM5709 and BCM5716. The specific chip however is not listed. Now I don't know the other chips that are listed, so it is not unlikely, that they are related (as in them being the single or double port version of the chip I am looking at). Basically: Has anyone got this card working under FreeBSD and can tell me if there are any quirks I should look out for? Best regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 01:38:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636DB14C68CD for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 01:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-x333.google.com (mail-ot1-x333.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::333]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B8C791A04 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 01:38:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-x333.google.com with SMTP id v23so7109186otk.9 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:38:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3VVGFJFm0XsgTq14+qbcVOiBOM60CVA9vxdEPzOm6HU=; b=h5zxjE3M2Jidp/fRifypg7xgkHrrMgznqyIJTeZv0OV+5v8vjUe75i9fLiBoNid0/F MX2obecDUrbVg44TWiPw+aGx2AiS+X/6fiQ0ibVYhJIufTJ4bduhkuMMUav2l29Pp9x/ DMdP9T2BRSgihDontDTtGl92jOuAd6eGM0iHVokN16U8Wp6taFsEJsFTELK73yyZYWNW m7xu2nm/4H9KnMO0cFdlxvVS5FzqJJoQkdgcq4PlF3NRju0hL3JO4m/0Yl8wPz/vSl8E 7P4s+nPRVV5uotTL9SzpcYEkN5LMsfk795SvMKC+CHnMPPbc+uCn4X6ygebHB6Fl6Bwj ScVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=3VVGFJFm0XsgTq14+qbcVOiBOM60CVA9vxdEPzOm6HU=; b=b7m/z7u9aQSkd3Of9DFFslGyQv16IsAS+IkPj3+OC27wYqP/BDQIUtecqJ/449bSgf iktK+uTUQxu45WfJkFBGufFA1AWqpREzp6vYUSefypKLpkk6jFsJ5/BGyDiuzLqqau53 xN78G7qlJb5SgxFQ+H3wwyrq/kflXtsCjvPWILI9rDelbG1GApLoZC1jKvBQUYUGToNW iNEu3uVP8cD7nXOHYuNOUeyOZrucfjZacSmGAIV7OMCR4hFV0r26KcJTPfLQY+X7cN98 e5Gzj69Cok9sPT7w7yQ7YUdHEdRI3dYediRG6Hz5OmuIznMA+B5JaKbeAJyL7plHmcSI //kg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukczsYNzWdo8zURCORV0zfuVFk6b7/s4wTTPGAE6f/5o2dbcCvEJ H+GII/HcvE960BBChOg51qpGWFpyoUe3DokFotrpbI4h X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5+KH2JLddWf4e+Wg1PH+ahHUbtm5c0HyqxFRK+UXbS69DZ/wKDaOFMqQHvDQyZ3TelX4/6ZUyra7dzvNVALco= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:664f:: with SMTP id q15mr6736823otm.282.1548380306009; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:38:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Kurt Buff - GSEC, GCIH" Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:38:13 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Question regarding NIC configuration To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 7B8C791A04 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=h5zxjE3M; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of kurtbuff@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::333 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kurtbuff@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.52 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.84)[-0.836,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.68)[ip: (-8.90), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.49), asn: 15169(-1.91), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 01:38:28 -0000 All, As I've reported before, I have a VM running in VMware Workstation on my Win10 production laptop at work. We use Ruckus WAPs for work in the Unleashed flavor, and they have a weird quirk - DHCP requests made by VMs while connected to wireless will not work[1]. Obviously, that presents a problem when off-premises, as DHCP is required when away from work. I'm looking for a quick/easy way to handle the transition from work to not-work and back for the FreeBSD VM - I've got a nifty powershell script for Windows, but that's really only for Windows. Anyone have a thought or two they'd like to share for making it easier to manage? Currently I'm reduced to editing /etc/rc.conf and issuing "netif restart". Does anyone have a better idea? Thanks, Kurt [1] For those who care, the Unleashed Ruckus units seem to use a Directed IP Broadcast for DHCP. Why this messes up DHCP for VMs but not hosts running them, I don't know, but it's really annoying. I use bridged mode for my VMs, per company policy (which I initiated, because as the admin, I get to talk with all machines on my network). I presume using NAT mode for the VMs wouldn't cause a problem, because then the host would issue an IP address, rather than the network DHCP server. FWIW, while troubleshooting this problem, I turned the Directed IP Broadcast facility off, and all of the phones on the guest network (which are served via the DHCP server on our firewall, rather than our production DHCP servers) stopped getting addresses, causing quite a bit of bleating, and I had to back out the change. I don't know if the regular flavor of Ruckus units using a controller exhibit different behavior. I also have no idea why turning off the Directed IP Broadcast affected the units on the guest network, and not the production wireless network, but as I had to back out the change less than an hour after implementing it, perhaps there wasn't enough time for the impact to make itself felt - the lease times on production vs. guest are significantly different. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 03:08:37 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D820148FF3F for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 03:08:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjohnstone.nospamfreebsd@tridentusa.com) Received: from mail.tridentusa.com (mail.tridentusa.com [96.225.19.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBFF94B60 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 03:08:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jjohnstone.nospamfreebsd@tridentusa.com) Received: (qmail 28422 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Jan 2019 03:01:44 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail.tridentusa.com by smtprelay.tridentusa.com (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.100.2/25327. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:1(172.16.0.32):. Processed in 0.027792 secs); 25 Jan 2019 03:01:44 -0000 Received: from mail.tridentusa.com (172.16.0.32) de/crypted with TLSv1: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA [256/256] DN=none by smtprelay.tridentusa.com with ESMTPS; 25 Jan 2019 03:01:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 64482 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2019 22:01:44 -0500 Received: from john-j.tridentusa.com (HELO ?172.16.0.90?) (jjohnstone@tridentusa.com@172.16.0.90) by mail.tridentusa.com with AES128-SHA encrypted SMTP; 24 Jan 2019 22:01:44 -0500 Subject: Re: Support for HP 331T To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <248dcdff-5858-9463-6a19-44d0b1701c69@icerats.de> From: John Johnstone Message-ID: Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:01:40 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <248dcdff-5858-9463-6a19-44d0b1701c69@icerats.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6BBFF94B60 X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jjohnstone.nospamfreebsd@tridentusa.com designates 96.225.19.3 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jjohnstone.nospamfreebsd@tridentusa.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.48 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.76)[-0.758,0]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tridentusa.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.91)[-0.912,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.65)[0.652,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail1.tridentusa.com,mail.tridentusa.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[3.19.225.96.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; IP_SCORE(-0.15)[asn: 701(-0.67), country: US(-0.08)]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:701, ipnet:96.225.0.0/17, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 03:08:37 -0000 On 1/24/2019 8:02 PM, Christian Baer wrote: > Anyways, a friend recommended I get the said 4-port network adapter > because it gets the job done and isn't all that expensive (~35 EUR used > on ebay). The question just is: Will it work with FreeBSD? > > As far as I could find out, these cards use a Broadcom BCM5719 chip - > which I could not find in the FreeBSD hardware list. The bce(4) driver > offers support for several chips that seem to be from the same family at > least, like the BCM5709 and BCM5716. The specific chip however is not > listed. A system here with a BCM5719 is running FreeBSD 12.0. It's supported by the bge driver. On FreeBSD 11.2 or 12.0 you can do a man bge and the BCM5719 is listed. - John J. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 06:32:09 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1DD314A95FE for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:32:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 869AF6B940 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:32:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joh.hendriks@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id q18so9002360wrx.9 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:32:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=CxWl8QoJHApp3egsqqVKaNVBN27945PzLHj8D7URC/4=; b=OBMGUCSdOzU0TNRBuECvayd7uM2uemN9yEpgP9RPPrRHzORmiqtZah6d7T7uZQHWcw n2UzGAbqQP5hOZwiYpUaSAkxhJbr/G4eYfRwF9IUUBrFT90/dSAsOE6m397RjCdY1CxV m9AjUCYCdooA5NMCgpoOwaIwL5m2ADxV0LlX09RdRKqX0Df/b3cmpmW1FrNapepdAXJU dZDPlRYOD+FTj9JSWHsVG21BikSo1KFhPY68sjOCEB9XmwJz0qXKUzZAZuCfhY5WZgi3 +7sVE+qDs+18WH1vP2Ii9peD479HuntIRzK9t4TVGapHk/pd/wGZsmhiizxNj4xxOe6w mA8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=CxWl8QoJHApp3egsqqVKaNVBN27945PzLHj8D7URC/4=; b=KphZlkVvxb4cuuNYNMgLaK0LKBc+OZPDAGaXUdFwkQ91fsD7MdohTacjdOmnTn0InT MObZgFF3dJKZmfjRI5q3RFtcnXI383pStkgLPuTd8YcSMZ7bclxH9iSrig4pyWBy7Y9c EatZ52jh1PTmjK8g1v1ffU/wFdr81HXwGxEgaanwytx6TfGtwpaX5ct+SyK+b/cgkZ6t H2BtlxgwFRq89HcPu8svWsAbr05A+1oiDZPpu+fYEWSMTugwMpDgzScuRTWV19SKK6q5 NcbXx5VPzOupIx62O3XNRYpER9nZOC28WXDdYCCLPvJjWtnQFgH9Y+WPhlCcwJpcZYr+ Up0Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukc9Iwjc7IHi5/ajYdIhTjTeDYIPj6WkDXwlEr/Metj4mOMHzL/8 2/iDf0v3gQY0COxuhvamqnOORbqSWxgg4molNZCrzA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4k0Xpqg/I2CEEco2pKH7m5emGVPEZZPY0u3pYJhgjlT7f9dLlu9yld3uXgQG0fy2sN+hIOS4igLEYGf3OK+IA= X-Received: by 2002:adf:f308:: with SMTP id i8mr9604418wro.219.1548397926015; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 22:32:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Johan Hendriks Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 07:31:54 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to locate status of r342928 To: freebsd-questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 869AF6B940 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=OBMGUCSd; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of johhendriks@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::42e as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=johhendriks@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.66 / 15.00]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.95)[-0.955,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.70)[ip: (-9.28), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.22), asn: 15169(-1.92), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[e.2.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 06:32:09 -0000 It will be MFC in two weeks. Tien it hit the stable branch like 12 stable and then it will be included in the next release. If you need it now you can wait for the merge from current and run 12 stable. Or you can update your source tree, patch that file and do a build world cycle. http://freshbsd.org/search?q=342928&project%5B%5D=freebsd&repository%5B%5D=src&sort=commit_date Op 19 jan. 2019 18:10 schreef "Carmel NY" : How can I find out the status of "r342928", committed on or about 1/10/2019? I am trying to find out when it will be available. -- Carmel _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 09:32:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BC014AECA3 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=RKSP=QB=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2025A72128 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:32:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=RKSP=QB=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D1DB514AEC9A; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF41E14AEC99 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=RKSP=QB=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: from orval.bbpf.belspo.be (orval.bbpf.belspo.be [193.191.208.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F7072125 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:32:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from SRS0=RKSP=QB=perdition.city=julien@bebif.be) Received: from mordor.lan (213.219.145.216.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net [213.219.145.216]) by orval.bbpf.belspo.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD8B11D4FC1B; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:32:25 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 10:32:24 +0100 From: Julien Cigar To: Simon Connah Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Building a FreeBSD switch with commodity hardware Message-ID: <20190125093223.GF64829@mordor.lan> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hcut4fGOf7Kh6EdG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49F7072125 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.98 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.982,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 09:32:36 -0000 --hcut4fGOf7Kh6EdG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 08:39:51PM +0000, Simon Connah wrote: > Hi everyone, >=20 > First of all I am not a networking wizard so would appreciate a little=20 > help to see if my plan is achievable. >=20 > I need a 1U switch to put in a datacentre and due to my familiarity with= =20 > FreeBSD I thought building a switch based on FreeBSD would be the=20 > perfect solution but I'm not sure what the hardware requirements would=20 > be. I have 10 to 20 1gbps Ethernet devices to connect to the switch and= =20 > a single 1gbps uplink to the rest of the internet. >=20 > I'd like to be able to configure VLANs, allocate IPv4 and IPv6 addresses= =20 > to individual machines and use FreeBSD as a firewall for the whole=20 > process. I also want to be able to expand my system at a later date if I= =20 > need to be able to handle more devices on the local network so I'd need= =20 > to be able to hook the two networks together somehow. >=20 > What I'm not sure about is what hardware specs I'll need for this. What= =20 > kind of CPU and RAM will I require and which Ethernet cards should I=20 > get? This is not a project that requires 100% up time but realiability=20 > is important during certain hours of the day. >=20 > I'd appreciate some advice. If you need any more information then let me= =20 > know and I'll try and provide it. You can also buy two "simple" L2 switches (we use two https://www.fs.com/fr/products/72944.html stacked) and buy two "small" devices where you install FreeBSD with PF, CARP, Unbound, etc (we use two https://www.netgate.com/products/rcc-ve-4860-1u.html) to do the routing/firewalling/dns cache/DHCP server/...). That's what we do here and it works like a charm for years. You'll have better performance with an L3 switch of course.. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" --=20 Julien Cigar Belgian Biodiversity Platform (http://www.biodiversity.be) PGP fingerprint: EEF9 F697 4B68 D275 7B11 6A25 B2BB 3710 A204 23C0 No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced. --hcut4fGOf7Kh6EdG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE7vn2l0to0nV7EWolsrs3EKIEI8AFAlxK16QACgkQsrs3EKIE I8AY0g//Y4sjvfkoRcjdZk3ox+IxnAX/kfNFisZxUYMA3FcukDtVPpLjMPuYJMY/ qLLEDK9Pc74394vkvqO35bIul1k17SFso0RFO2Atk83VQt74/GeZGCtNp3aNsi08 qpUOffhrg5byhPS5r8jXUOC9BcnOcmIYxPgs+jO/y5owbqWnCXee0IBwdJRsRdVE 7lR8RqsPrnzyg+b9h7unwj1qRt3jE4h6HiK96FY1jv0/jL5nvEZXolRu+bdsxj4n kupGI5JclPpdDNMO4Eh0ukRrS1UcjM7M2CQSUEETvIfJBMb4jb06gd5+8AxEILAr G8zxKJNSBNjVis25YQxAQ37BlKz21tBrPy3hNod4tbCvzhUiA8Y90JCUlIfHfTxz D0PmOYBgLMjwclFDB1UGFuaPKFY8QXGBx4hpe+Vaw4INsGFlETi6OxVBebQQelci 2X+yZQ28910grEo6Om8A0FurP9Miilfu1hH0rueOIb6VVeq0bkFXr+Xen+lVChKC LKsek2fDrl2k2dxqwaeQb9sAwrfuTZ4Q0VNAM63K4HWkMa1WNtm0qXE9qTVux/ik kCNJ7aFXtoDWBq7Rgjp9eSQjjgBsjQuUCcfxHpkJRaEDCS0VxREFqbLA790NAieH 0k4gysctZrAfwfIABjAblgoqxSVOd+2CuwU897AWsVSsxklTVZ4= =T1r7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hcut4fGOf7Kh6EdG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 13:33:01 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0587814B5D78 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:33:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de) Received: from dd13304.kasserver.com (dd13304.kasserver.com [85.13.135.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA3648395B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de) Received: from [192.168.100.8] (b9168eb6.cgn.dg-w.de [185.22.142.182]) by dd13304.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2ADBA5E208A4 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:32:57 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Support for HP 331T References: <248dcdff-5858-9463-6a19-44d0b1701c69@icerats.de> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christian Baer Message-ID: <2075c230-af5b-90fa-3c34-95aff44f1a1b@informatik.uni-dortmund.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:33:00 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DA3648395B X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de does not designate 85.13.135.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.76 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.52)[-0.517,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.81)[0.808,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uni-dortmund.de]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.65)[0.648,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: esa3.itmc.tu-dortmund.de]; IP_SCORE(0.03)[asn: 34788(0.17), country: DE(-0.01)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[53.135.13.85.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34788, ipnet:85.13.135.0/24, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 13:33:01 -0000 On 25.01.2019 04:01, John Johnstone wrote: > A system here with a BCM5719 is running FreeBSD 12.0.  It's supported by > the bge driver.  On FreeBSD 11.2 or 12.0 you can do a man bge and the > BCM5719 is listed. Thanks for the info, man! As you saw, I was looking at the bce driver and not the bge. That's why I pulled a blank! :-/ Anyways, thanks again! Regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 14:43:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6880414B7C60 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:43:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de) Received: from dd13304.kasserver.com (dd13304.kasserver.com [85.13.135.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 638118699A for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:43:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de) Received: from [192.168.100.8] (b9168eb6.cgn.dg-w.de [185.22.142.182]) by dd13304.kasserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 353445E2033E for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:43:52 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christian Baer Subject: enlarging a ZFS file system Message-ID: <85fc7b92-3e40-33e2-b079-91d04944d13a@informatik.uni-dortmund.de> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:43:54 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 638118699A X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de does not designate 85.13.135.53 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=christian.baer@uni-dortmund.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.90 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.53)[-0.526,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.83)[0.826,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[uni-dortmund.de]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.78)[0.784,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: esa3.itmc.tu-dortmund.de]; IP_SCORE(0.03)[asn: 34788(0.16), country: DE(-0.01)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[53.135.13.85.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34788, ipnet:85.13.135.0/24, country:DE]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:43:55 -0000 Hey again everyone! I have a system with 5 drives running a RAIDZ2. The file system is getting a little cramped, so I would like to extend it. Ideally I'd like to add 2 or three (identical) drives to the pool, let the system work a little and then have a result as if I'd created the whole thing from the start with 7 or 8 drives. Just to be clear: The result should be a RAIDZ2 with 7 or 8 drives (depending on how many I add). A couple of years back, I read up on if this were possible and the only way to enlarge a RAIDZ at the time was to replace *all* the existing drives piece by piece with bigger ones and let the RAID heal drive by drive. During my research I did stumble on a thread where developers of ZFS were discussing that what I would like to do was actually a good idea and a relatively widely requested feature. I didn't participate in the discussion and for some reason cannot find it anymore. I must admit that I didn't save the URL at the time. :-( Has there been any development in this direction? Can what I'd like to do be done with FreeBSD today? The drives in question are used for archive purposes and don't really see much action, so I am not worried that they will die it the data on them gets copied around a fair bit. Y'all have a nice weekend! ;-) Regards, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 15:01:18 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F09B714B867E for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@osfux.nl) Received: from vm1982.osfux.nl (vm1982.osfux.nl [IPv6:2a03:5500:1724:55:79:99:187:212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D895E8772A for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:01:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mail@osfux.nl) Received: from vm1982.osfux.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vm1982.osfux.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB54220408; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:00:51 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=osfux.nl; s=default; t=1548428452; bh=meBLtxPTbgCh5I+xymhlHDUBS34I3owTWNiZ7WBvfUo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=MVYzBJmxhmXcY1LNohtF/YD5on2sS51G4AjHlnTexG5CjUfWBE0oEJFv/u3tTZFM4 2FUp/7gVTZXZbVJSoq3C8sgvuAmFAqcwFEj+ssU0W8O0BZOxBbdQg0u2+N9JapSONf TuAQ0zOXQ+WjRQr+n3XLH3miNeT4PyP4Qn/8QQV4Gz6+tOPLHbNsNyDGhVywKdfNzr Jm1VL573memwx8z3U/FIQahnRPeKkW3KqkvcdIwSLAY7bJlteef+buVqvy8eNQ6Hnd APH6/Jkfreso/v3WyHPIcl/G/0hBCTmGTTKOeGt4NiuIXMJ0/U8Itmf3PzePhk3ksf LKs6gzPGUNBGX+Syh5pK1UUOyj2pNrygYqr1CKNiRChW9795OfJF+FIevfLwhmkyY7 DYMG+7Bvn/eBqOZ6cCmvQ+r2cwytDNbA/+NkhtmVjJxKYPAOSOs5n7Dtkbga+etHnd HyelK8KyT8Fw6t+x6A0Rwflf6LOVG07Ji77r8tXN9PI0Hj2RMtG/wMh2eubQ0HILR8 sKAmw+YayOVw/KLxMl9OSkvJRwbtJAFkr5di6M5JB6CNiS7IpFwImzNVluqKQdsXWD L6xIgRjQ9YS5u3s0P1308Ry+p6afkjzBXDfJsZnRBZWXrxm9JXUNrFj4+xr/tHG6Xr r5XBd9QBN1Hw49iUQH/HT61I= Received: from vm1982.osfux.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vm1982.osfux.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9828E2013D; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:00:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=osfux.nl; s=default; t=1548428451; bh=meBLtxPTbgCh5I+xymhlHDUBS34I3owTWNiZ7WBvfUo=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TAf7XviN354AYugyd0OvJdbNDKwR949mtbrtCKvWAdmg8iLetZh8/0Qybdg9q6AfP gt5yvuiXpRv9+C2K6JTEDapmG6WQCPrL4EydHyLcTuuqbAbqVIxRaBnNkJ/dl6eGSq YTRDfi1Kjjsl7zTS6nDqF/x59X39BSlLCPeCjy1Ijzxz1aNAboo4VHBXBOlINP4REN FUuaeUjIpHIXFjDf5OFLUjUfKkeJlyj5PzE9xr8foZxboGKDeBGjoz/WQ7b3ctJzSE aJ1MQGfy6WOq440RYKscV3ENYwWObP6MHPmS9pfZApBiZafm0ETqQR8EUChCXchKwe jXegXnYMZRU2HSx79q633RyJfPcpn6fGk0sX0fnJ0/g83597b693cnWnzL4Lsi+v/N dPVDpZ2LCaQkkyNUQIGoDTK6Sjaa//tpEZLHWjSiDLTOH+tDm1WqbRsNs8cRr9P+m8 Ekskr9f8iXKVyOC3xggFXJd52iFuFDN4RIK1016AopJNDRcwVYEloiwwsrdc3kbbJh AmoDY7W1YDcUgUthruhbJxUvRg/mW0h8CW3BTwTQ5TH7Qjt9+FtAWCnK30CTyABO7i VJek35vZHp0vDGcJ948/kH8Df9sAs9rZB40319ags30QjkPd2xqaZrww4Lx3dbZnlx KYVoKN5pM8aVW1zWiBqXOHbw= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on vm1982.osfux.nl X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [192.168.9.77] (ip51ccb320.speed.planet.nl [81.204.179.32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vm1982.osfux.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:00:49 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: enlarging a ZFS file system To: Christian Baer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <85fc7b92-3e40-33e2-b079-91d04944d13a@informatik.uni-dortmund.de> From: Ruben Message-ID: <4a12e8d8-2671-14c4-cbcf-3e0084a1f803@osfux.nl> Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:00:51 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <85fc7b92-3e40-33e2-b079-91d04944d13a@informatik.uni-dortmund.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D895E8772A X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=osfux.nl header.s=default header.b=MVYzBJmx; dkim=pass header.d=osfux.nl header.s=default header.b=TAf7XviN; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=osfux.nl; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mail@osfux.nl designates 2a03:5500:1724:55:79:99:187:212 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mail@osfux.nl X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.34 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[osfux.nl:s=default]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-0.49)[asn: 34762(-2.46), country: BE(-0.00)]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[osfux.nl:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[osfux.nl,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[transip.osfux.nl,vm1982.osfux.nl]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.83)[-0.834,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:34762, ipnet:2a03:5500::/31, country:BE]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 15:01:18 -0000 Hi, Not anything that is production ready - as far as I know-, but I did read something in the last status update: https://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-2018-01-2018-09.html (look for "OpenZFS RAID-Z Expansion project" ) Regards, ruben On 1/25/19 3:43 PM, Christian Baer wrote: > Hey again everyone! > > I have a system with 5 drives running a RAIDZ2. The file system is > getting a little cramped, so I would like to extend it. > > Ideally I'd like to add 2 or three (identical) drives to the pool, let > the system work a little and then have a result as if I'd created the > whole thing from the start with 7 or 8 drives. Just to be clear: The > result should be a RAIDZ2 with 7 or 8 drives (depending on how many I add). > > A couple of years back, I read up on if this were possible and the only > way to enlarge a RAIDZ at the time was to replace *all* the existing > drives piece by piece with bigger ones and let the RAID heal drive by > drive. During my research I did stumble on a thread where developers of > ZFS were discussing that what I would like to do was actually a good > idea and a relatively widely requested feature. I didn't participate in > the discussion and for some reason cannot find it anymore. I must admit > that I didn't save the URL at the time. :-( > > Has there been any development in this direction? Can what I'd like to > do be done with FreeBSD today? The drives in question are used for > archive purposes and don't really see much action, so I am not worried > that they will die it the data on them gets copied around a fair bit. > > Y'all have a nice weekend! ;-) > > Regards, > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jan 25 22:22:36 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF2614C527B for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joy@peakserp.com) Received: from mail-it1-x141.google.com (mail-it1-x141.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::141]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97DD576020 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joy@peakserp.com) Received: by mail-it1-x141.google.com with SMTP id h193so11875794ita.5 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:22:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=peakserp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aoJQXetIRIElAG1difbBTSjwmsNyn+F56nJpQqPLZgg=; b=ladrZaJOxfJ7eGibUvHe0sxkW72XLuSkuYCQ3PtmFrAHeOjGOEGYvPLL8p1l7TIR6Q rzeTbkplUwuw699fDqsBLQ3x/1mmAKzaEB1KFbBs3ERyVtiaAcGaK/XOfEuExl8zi0NR E2QaNOdUHnxBr4O3QKVzCgzVEk+iUPrLOhwKNJ5KQTRMo/JKLHtu+obpYKrW518JShgJ Xu88+4WTeMdHYVz67YfCSyGis+Bymeo0uKUvBW4AM2qKLjYHXTh7UV8Kha8au50/+k/o lpvXPzJGUBdLMozoWM9n4jNE0AbxQIe0gVP+sGaEQxrJTRfoe6rFXZnBIEutlgHo4Fwv WiKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject :to; bh=aoJQXetIRIElAG1difbBTSjwmsNyn+F56nJpQqPLZgg=; b=oSPJLQU8yl2PDrT8AdunMPgS6Orm8pa3oYWibuqN8/u088WNlTL19TgcHFJOAOIcr5 mmF1AZ4b8FbH//or1LpqkFgGJqBq3YvkBugCg9sIQHUhw6zX64WbljxxQO1d4ahmRHF8 vCLj2EJb9Uq0JNanSLTAL2Rh2twdosNYQlXov5vL71q+sG1mmYTYDN7gZ+OPHuDhwbiN JvroW6+Zhrhn2nE2Gn1Lubkp991Fn04Y/nAeHCxvBADv5+7Umi/4acfDfjEOSfVC4+Jq qd0SKA9NfdjkjuyZeRALPgnBESkJ0HpaJ5Pa00101x2ZnMc1PjeeWOdt6Gmcal0DWpz+ kKDA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUuke8nY0kSGj79tW7vSwX66cZ8/82YlzS29twyIU0QQQRhZWnE8/Y VxyVyAECdGKOltOtcOKqm/ee3LHsojDjwN6o+xnOIKrh X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7po/ciICKXhciOigzUbeXrqEkKnKUnibSGs+xSR/tLWU3AF4znWiwTBtZ2M0J0hZbzo4sPS5xBzwHm6M/ZCpw= X-Received: by 2002:a24:3dd5:: with SMTP id n204mr5835282itn.104.1548454952939; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from 52669349336 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:22:32 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: Joy Calliford From: Joy Calliford Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 14:22:32 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 0Zs0shFvA4QujPV3BrWR3nhqUXY Message-ID: Subject: Get More Calls & Visitor For Your Website : freebsd.org To: Freebsd-Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 97DD576020 X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=peakserp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=ladrZaJO; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of joy@peakserp.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::141 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=joy@peakserp.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.11 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.98)[-0.978,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[peakserp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; URL_IN_SUBJECT(0.40)[freebsd.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[peakserp.com]; URI_COUNT_ODD(1.00)[1]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[peakserp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com,ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com,ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com,ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com,ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[1.4.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.71)[-0.714,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.989,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; IP_SCORE(-0.32)[ip: (2.92), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.50), asn: 15169(-1.93), country: US(-0.08)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 22:22:36 -0000 Hi freebsd.org Team, Hope you are doing well. I thought you might like to know some of the reasons why you are not getting enough organic & social media traffic for your website freebsd.org. Take a break from your busy schedule and give attention towards search engine traffic. Don=E2=80=99t you think to start a fresh and better interne= t campaign? We found some major issues present in your website as mentioned below: =E2=80=A2 Your website page rank is low, this can be improved further. =E2=80=A2 Found HTML errors in the home page. =E2=80=A2 Your website has limited number of back links. This can be improv= ed after proper off page campaign. After receiving your response we will provide a detailed Scope of Work outlining specific activity to be done and fees for your review. Please let me know if you need more information. Also, if this is not the right address then could you please forward this to the respective decision maker? Kind Regards, Joy Calliford | Business Analyst ------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------- *Note:- **If you are interested then my Sales Manager will come back to you with an affordable SEO & Digital Marketing plan which contains our services, client reference, price list etc.* [image: beacon] From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 12:25:24 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4193A14C175D for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 12:25:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ixbug@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8DE277E08 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 12:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ixbug@riseup.net) Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (cotinga-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.164]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E3F01A0AC0 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 04:25:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1548505514; bh=ENRPPo1arNhMJnj+Zox3wQSqmfO1IBRR/dfrUjaKsiQ=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=Cfcu6B9Jt6K3BJNN//iyc4aQv/kg6lY4+a1v1HFiubdsFkLLFOhbxFy9on3RXCa/k gv3gpsV99Wc9kBt4uWyXiXQRRl41ws90NXGrPPOKizLIOYVytUQycyhvS8FpRUzs+4 rNB338itIDOElR7K0eyLtaSjoRSHmwq3kjXkK/gQ= X-Riseup-User-ID: 398C4B73DD62127EBAE31C4586A4CE619E6F7018CB64F9ED7165F936B509ABD1 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cotinga.riseup.net with ESMTPSA id 468C24198D for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 04:25:12 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: ixbug@riseup.net Subject: How to enable coredumps for BIND? Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 12:25:00 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A8DE277E08 X-Spamd-Bar: ------- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=riseup.net header.s=squak header.b=Cfcu6B9J; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=riseup.net; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ixbug@riseup.net designates 198.252.153.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ixbug@riseup.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-7.81 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[riseup.net:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx1.riseup.net]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[riseup.net,none]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.93)[-0.934,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-3.76)[ip: (-9.88), ipnet: 198.252.153.0/24(-4.92), asn: 16652(-3.94), country: US(-0.08)]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16652, ipnet:198.252.153.0/24, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[129.153.252.198.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[riseup.net:s=squak]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DWL_DNSWL_LOW(-1.00)[riseup.net.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 12:25:24 -0000 Hello, since named crashes I'd like to enable core dumps for further analysis. I added this to my options section of named.conf: coresize unlimited; and restarted named. kern.corefile sysctl setting is: /tmp/%N.core but when I issue the following command to test if a core file gets created: # kill -6 no file is created in /tmp. "ulimit -c" output is: unlimited Creating a core file using "gcore " works. I assume dumpon is not relevant for non-kernel dumps: $ dumpon -l /dev/null used version: bind913-9.13.5_2 (no chroot) FreeBSD 12 Any help is appreciated. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 15:54:20 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFF614C7330 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:54:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robbelics@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A26678894B for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:54:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from robbelics@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id t18-v6so10793841ljd.4 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 07:54:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hQ3/8maS0TFuJquTgZ/x1r2o32lR1a2bcQ877MZR36I=; b=HxgUkc3oyizeBAB3ceRxUWrJl9qW1CP9dN+KLk38lXzUqLJCg7K1td74y/UHixH7BZ vx47qdIRvDAGSwXS71M4J3B+tAYhQUcTOJ1gR9rAaVrIlorXma85bDk8vSDlHCiwQSiF ajZZ2hD1V312k8bA0bLSmIZ0OMxVYoTuqT8hGpKD/GxXramBZMwJorLNtjdSYtLBuuhH zaGBP3NQjvZMNCbX7bOXLZBfGC6gDQ/1ZMi4owOruAiT+RuSzZbcuOc7VlvurEpsyoH1 /baZ35n8JWt2pQ/jaRzrpjXhJb43JFSwSXK9zNi+4dHjiWDVXPTOIZkvDYDcw4y2CAGH 7/Lw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hQ3/8maS0TFuJquTgZ/x1r2o32lR1a2bcQ877MZR36I=; b=ilI83erDXLctcf67sDZ3g5w0Klh0gLD15WZsL2ua7SGDrkj3e4x+uZDXGrslaksiOv hjG+4PPqq/BHI0cxNpe4QLuGq+D81N5Du8Uf0u3KRevJ5XqZRZf+gWKpRkP3StkpfqaE S1SH9AS7b9bapNKnwiNFodeuS4Ayx5Zq5j0YxEiG/YilFP/43azFcIBs9Gj0y9Hwhc8Y CnEl8lgZHKBwlhCfPyXxVfLTimQlJ9iR/KGyYqrOGCiqroG+ztRR0tZ982GBrkH4BlmJ /hVSQHE5pxVLd70iptVFvQE/2sCztViYoTRXwmAS6RCbSLzRqGWNxYw0QWEanjQKeCA3 T+eQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuYqI2U1GtI0CPJAU1TGt22Hz8pDN/iPekxjT/8QtQnfhnfmDAwT odQcj1y0fWEAMpTu1ZgjYk0gKQUa7JKNJ23eH4lrORE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IbqcNxLwZ+6DNruzEZXmv8yqpnEjYvvC86UzQ9GOuagoVh1GpPudL6a+AataM7JqfuhC1wd9DnKo9/wE7Esx1M= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:3a10:: with SMTP id h16-v6mr7598901lja.184.1548518056558; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 07:54:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Rob Belics Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 09:54:05 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Wireless interface To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: A26678894B X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=HxgUkc3o; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of robbelics@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::22d as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=robbelics@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.38 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[d.2.2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-2.56)[ip: (-8.56), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.25), asn: 15169(-1.93), country: US(-0.08)]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.80)[-0.801,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:54:20 -0000 > It is situations like this that make me love > Microsoft. Connecting a wireless network should not require user > intervention other than choosing the network and entering the password. FreeBSD is not a consumer operating system. It's not designed to hand hold anyone. That is why Windows is such a huge monstrosity of an install. From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 16:00:59 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E202F14C76AB for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:00:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asv@inhio.net) Received: from cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.net (mail.inhio.net [178.238.36.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8DB88D42 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:00:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asv@inhio.net) Received: from titanio (titanio.inhio.net [10.0.0.21]) by cz-prg-mx-01.inhio.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 06C17F2CC for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:00:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <989e79372513e9769c6857b531f14df8ce0b6f3a.camel@inhio.net> Subject: PF issue since 11.2-RELEASE From: ASV To: questions list Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:00:42 +0100 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-q4Ngi7Zt0JOb9o0pehmR" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 FreeBSD GNOME Team Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6B8DB88D42 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of asv@inhio.net designates 178.238.36.226 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=asv@inhio.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.26 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.20)[multipart/signed,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[inhio.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; IP_SCORE(0.01)[country: CZ(0.04)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.inhio.net]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.46)[-0.456,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; SIGNED_PGP(-2.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:24971, ipnet:178.238.32.0/20, country:CZ]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:01:00 -0000 --=-q4Ngi7Zt0JOb9o0pehmR Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, since I've upgraded to 11.2 (from 11.1) I've observed that anytime I change something on pf.conf and reload (pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf) I partially loose connectivity. Partially means that I still am connected to the server but the server cannot connect anywhere or ping anything (no hosts no IPs) also the jails instantly suffers from the same. The quickest fix is to revert the PF configuration to the previous one and reload. Everything starts working again. I've been trying to find the root cause of this without success. Did I miss some major change on the PF port on FreeBSD? I've never seen this serious issue before nor on FreeBSD neither on OpenBSD. --=-q4Ngi7Zt0JOb9o0pehmR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEE5dE8BwbhhcQw2TsezaQsUNd+zIkFAlxMhCoACgkQzaQsUNd+ zIkEpQf/QrRlIHUtvWrqORdZrzzzpNNH7oLAc3r8lhUmIfTZ9JfCCA/9DJ9kxfEv 6wDQ31O4/nfm+fdo1NNuFG/CL426ccFLDcNFMUsNfApXO4ygDCtBTU5znI75PE+b LGjXnmP0YmJ9oE1hKtNj73VYxefwDVGMWpwt8DGM2R18BdxkBvxdJIDHgue5EzLR sMMntxp82kFi8X9cmeflRsGfXkSt9syFKA2dZtLgUl6QsKxBoc1wc00m9+P8UlWX c99Gr0t/AfPO9QzhlEweY57sHDlKhH5uyQwub2K0TAk8jWeq+6pQkj8vkM2oSolT Smc7a4Sp/2I5FaiIu4V9/81KQN6kNg== =Bk/j -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-q4Ngi7Zt0JOb9o0pehmR-- From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 18:50:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BB214AA2D6 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:50:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092005086.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.5.86]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB9418F7C6 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@outlook.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=c5APVmp9f36JoVzfFd84bVSYPFcPeJMm/FqOLG67Cgo=; b=RF/Ut7MoAq67ZX5/7zgwdV/AE+Lo/VAWgpEOF1EARcOJZgrDpOUawADlIveLbIFkFRgrg8wb58Tge7QOuXfA39vRxpE+clX756IVJPOYHyRzBq8dImK41sU6TCits28brTf5lVbl+C6M2yTT3llzOYaYd54BZ1MJc8GNT/dtfPJm2QzeYu6C/RDGRVQJPMF0TktwD7jJ/KL8zMguvNrO2vvNqPsrfeJRnmM1zD/A192NKXPrfJDpposGrQRunpj4IdoRnkqjZX+8R2myq+VsD201pINB4WjT+7BON2R/PwRGtRML6EAG95+Jq9owrS8iYePKK2bYz9BkrR82qKfkIA== Received: from SN1NAM02FT032.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.60) by SN1NAM02HT074.eop-nam02.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.227) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1580.10; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:50:53 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (10.152.72.54) by SN1NAM02FT032.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.72.126) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1580.10 via Frontend Transport; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:50:53 +0000 Received: from MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a]) by MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::54e2:c696:902a:de4a%11]) with mapi id 15.20.1558.021; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:50:53 +0000 From: Carmel NY To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Wireless interface Thread-Topic: Wireless interface Thread-Index: AQHUtagQzMPe8OUxXECEEuPaVn/37A== Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:50:53 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: FreeBSD Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-clientproxiedby: BN6PR02CA0041.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:404:5f::27) To MWHPR04MB0495.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:300:72::8) x-mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; i686-w64-mingw32) x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:623A36FE1DD5CD030F4C26A75C31A06125F9A26B517652C77ED3B44738172E10; UpperCasedChecksum:497CA063A5AC59EDECC045E8E763722B62D1125ACEB18200CF71723C643F684B; SizeAsReceived:8574; Count:66 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [4thl1aUGhs1/F7VwxXaJ8aIGTizho2nC6/X2aSrzDao=] x-microsoft-original-message-id: <20190126135048.0000064f@outlook.com> x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1NAM02HT074; 6:3RSZA8FTVOcwshDPqRX+dmiDRHTzd+sehnIeCJ/qB+A3VA6uRP6RM7jHW7iM3j3bcLNA7YqF2AcCbAP2flbx0P8JlvJzt8uBzdvJ3PhTUHEtcWng0fbYDvbYb7Ur0NC6UX9TPBzvN2nFgqqC8O2FzQzQL7OYsyfPsjmY9/TWwiBXfVNsvVfzXLn2KQTYdUZZP1GCItt0PWE+B2wbRttzLh9jjWDSb+Vi1hdZsnf78VgzSHl0zlrSfFLKB7dYBv4AolNyOTE6IWaj5H5ZA9aaRnPkbM/mliIL3CuzUS5HHldeJvj809qyJpqYsyLYUgNVzwxzP5/NDwJEp3Ldvd8eVTEJn5wVm4qHkaE8twJl8y0slbaAQekJZv72dqmA3dkp3SOia7hog41HdOQwDLGLDZZ/Jdw7dZJLrXFgVguWE0B/zJCs1eIazDtIjZ/p1Wq3+KnLTuAumkY83SZvh+0HYA==; 5:pjhnAR1zq9buWH4Y4tfUt1l8uskf0Se4BgqlMm0ZCpFrR0GJXsWBbxMyfqsQ4iK0jVb9O6g5eTYr5D2izk1Rpm08uWMp4SCbMZs8mqWlBkQRnFMevW3JRuyfrG8jHH7vdaZ9fClaATqLNWjEEVMsBkeDzQA7nsiaGRaRJVHVswRDXHrdK7kNNJDyR3jMzYxJir0Pbm/j1NhCiEhL78JNfQ==; 7:fEAGjQPjSDfj+nrJnie2hd2mu37WMDY+8gjFG0yj5sZd9d0dSnXblYtWqUMd5bW6r1e9OZYoYZbjMnegO3iYA4Cj5FkqEk1YTSPfXLyE8BY4Ara2TwER+FsT8Iii1O3nD89UxOHMRU60ZAfcchUUSg== x-incomingheadercount: 66 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031323274)(2017031324274)(2017031322404)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:SN1NAM02HT074; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN1NAM02HT074: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4566010)(82015058); SRVR:SN1NAM02HT074; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1NAM02HT074; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: Ii7OY0oOK/3FlMUZZ8pakeiGhhC6fuMSks1ewNCqjcTqLb5cpsiSU5wrDKpouVEe Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 918d3ffc-1248-4d74-9eee-08d683bf320f X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: 9a4e3081-9524-43cf-bfc3-dcaef82d5da1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 26 Jan 2019 18:50:52.0239 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1NAM02HT074 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BB9418F7C6 X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=outlook.com header.s=selector1 header.b=RF/Ut7Mo; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=outlook.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carmel_ny@outlook.com designates 40.92.5.86 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carmel_ny@outlook.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.40 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:40.92.0.0/14]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[outlook.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[outlook.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com,outlook-com.olc.protection.outlook.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.60)[-0.602,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; REPLYTO_EQ_TO_ADDR(5.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8075, ipnet:40.64.0.0/10, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[outlook.com]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[outlook.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[outlook.com:s=selector1]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; IP_SCORE(-0.99)[ipnet: 40.64.0.0/10(-2.63), asn: 8075(-2.26), country: US(-0.08)]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[86.5.92.40.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.3.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:50:56 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 09:54:05 -0600, Rob Belics stated: >> It is situations like this that make me love >> Microsoft. Connecting a wireless network should not require user >> intervention other than choosing the network and entering the >> password. =20 > >FreeBSD is not a consumer operating system. It's not designed to hand >hold anyone. That is why Windows is such a huge monstrosity of an >install. I just finished a fresh install of Windows 10. If you take the time involved in installing a basic MS Windows system vs. a basic FreeBSD system, Windows will usually win. A big plus is that Windows actually can get a wireless system up and running by itself, sans perhaps supplying the password. Does FreeBSD even support using the WPS Button on the Wi-Fi Router? Plus, you then have to install a GUI. Now, if you want to compare a FreeBSD system sans GUI, you have to compare it against a MS Server, not the regular Windows version design for home or office users. This is not about "hand-holding"; it is about bring the OS into the modern age. My machine is supposed to be my slave, not the other way around. Thanks for your comment anyway. --=20 Carmel From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 19:56:29 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B3614ABF76 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:56:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from acupuncture@cgocable.ca) Received: from fvipqcsab01.cogeco.net (smtp5.cogeco.ca [216.221.81.71]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68B86AD8F for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:56:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from acupuncture@cgocable.ca) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BwEwAEukxc/2LmRkVkHgEGBwaBZQKBB?= =?us-ascii?q?4IyIRKEKIh5i18DAQEBAQEBBQGBCAghg16FW5BOOAGEQAKDLDgSAQMBAQIBAQI?= =?us-ascii?q?BbChCFgGBYSKCbwYjDwEjMwsaAhQMBgICORABDRMIAQEagwSBdQ2oc4Evg0E9g?= =?us-ascii?q?UWEYoELi014gQeBOAyCX4RrYwKCOoJXApEckSsHAgKGaos8HpIsnSkhgVaELZB?= =?us-ascii?q?5JIEzAT0BikCBEYIpAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BwEwAEukxc/2LmRkVkHgEGBwaBZQKBB4IyIRKEKIh5i18?= =?us-ascii?q?DAQEBAQEBBQGBCAghg16FW5BOOAGEQAKDLDgSAQMBAQIBAQIBbChCFgGBYSKCb?= =?us-ascii?q?wYjDwEjMwsaAhQMBgICORABDRMIAQEagwSBdQ2oc4Evg0E9gUWEYoELi014gQe?= =?us-ascii?q?BOAyCX4RrYwKCOoJXApEckSsHAgKGaos8HpIsnSkhgVaELZB5JIEzAT0BikCBE?= =?us-ascii?q?YIpAQE?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.56,527,1539662400"; d="scan'208";a="104335597" Received: from modemcable098.230-70-69.static.videotron.ca (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([69.70.230.98]) by fvipqcsab01.cogeco.net with ESMTP; 26 Jan 2019 14:56:18 -0500 Subject: Re: Wireless interface To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: From: "Myster.Hide" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:53:44 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr-FR X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D68B86AD8F X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of acupuncture@cgocable.ca designates 216.221.81.71 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=acupuncture@cgocable.ca X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.15 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:216.221.81.0/24]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[cgocable.ca]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.27)[0.275,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.80)[-0.802,0]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[country: CA(-0.09)]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.91)[0.909,0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx2.cgocable.ca,mx3.cgocable.ca]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[71.81.221.216.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:7992, ipnet:216.221.64.0/19, country:CA]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:56:29 -0000 Le 26/01/2019 à 13:50, Carmel NY a écrit : > On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 09:54:05 -0600, Rob Belics stated: > >>> It is situations like this that make me love >>> Microsoft. Connecting a wireless network should not require user >>> intervention other than choosing the network and entering the >>> password. >> FreeBSD is not a consumer operating system. It's not designed to hand >> hold anyone. That is why Windows is such a huge monstrosity of an >> install. > I just finished a fresh install of Windows 10. If you take the time > involved in installing a basic MS Windows system vs. a basic FreeBSD > system, Windows will usually win. A big plus is that Windows actually > can get a wireless system up and running by itself, sans perhaps > supplying the password. Does FreeBSD even support using the WPS Button > on the Wi-Fi Router? Plus, you then have to install a GUI. Now, if you > want to compare a FreeBSD system sans GUI, you have to compare it > against a MS Server, not the regular Windows version design for home or > office users. > > This is not about "hand-holding"; it is about bring the OS into the > modern age. My machine is supposed to be my slave, not the other way > around. > > Thanks for your comment anyway. > Windows is your slave? Really? From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 19:58:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6244D14AC07C for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antranigv@freebsd.am) Received: from mail-ot1-x335.google.com (mail-ot1-x335.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::335]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E29E6AE42 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antranigv@freebsd.am) Received: by mail-ot1-x335.google.com with SMTP id e12so11543989otl.5 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 11:58:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd-am.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=in8KGhGi+kLq6cZGdZfKexc9jA+domyVkFdeyfULpKA=; b=Im04cJ5nm7ecwJnlFO/ZJaTOr3lnXCeQur3e+6FhtYCWfYTUi/Qob62R3xguykwTdG 2lkpPA/3IueWZY7/wD3DdDKJpyJFPAvpK4DPyc5eWsLBNgXiceVTG3ExqADhrdUbZEvM nvqlU3MY6cNQ2Yb86GPkM6Jbqz4B5ubC0mn9Rz6mpWuot5k0hYRAknHnPHuIA7AfjUJ0 /cA11IeHLyP3VFKzOmHpQyd2FoEKJYlbWEfKJS9DZpWM+/l3Xi7rmb0PcWdBA70AkxcZ LXAOEotI9cca+ig8Xn4uT/cu7oJM40Q5T5tVBMdAXeyMg1+VJXT2C6hBT13OQqU+0Mqz RZ/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=in8KGhGi+kLq6cZGdZfKexc9jA+domyVkFdeyfULpKA=; b=UE1owdczuyUaEIlNFI1+2QT5K4tHP+scwTV+zf4OFZVVzE+UvHevg4NbeBp7XuJUUc qshzNdvVQ97JlHBGZMj7mQ5f5AnjOMh9nKz0h1COQPzLMiLSS6hSxd7WbwB0EuBUVgXt KtiGY6anQlrvo+19g80l2SyDH+v81BUuXcig5OzCHbDxoxKUGG70CxoxAKi4XuplntuE aQj9Mf1q3UoZQGo7f2CqsOG1uiM1Pc+wUB6idER+XTkiO0pkOOJ6amZDsQfWcLiWrqEx HgX+tGVCO7tCp2XbuSuzcjSwAXZoAA0BGFBH8OSziZ30RL9KD5h9SSeAMx/gp7Wb5CzZ BX6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukc3rQDCbNqZERe1gLlraMBWlJzPeLjJjuGhHtEDJZ/oBf8jgoJb O3ol0mk3LzDQYJ4l1CmBLTHGVqoLubWZOQNNh4S2ag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN4hP1PYrwfuKecS5kkuRCRdJ0m8joLKEWyRuD8B89tsfZ4QOVy+F3strHOW0TGBe+96ndKB9QdKRNUu0rJWFSc= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3782:: with SMTP id x2mr11289006otb.13.1548532705985; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 11:58:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Antranig Vartanian Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 23:58:14 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Wireless interface To: "Myster.Hide" Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4E29E6AE42 X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=freebsd-am.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=Im04cJ5n; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of antranigv@freebsd.am designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::335 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=antranigv@freebsd.am X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.27 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[freebsd-am.20150623.gappssmtp.com:s=20150623]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.am]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[freebsd-am.20150623.gappssmtp.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[5.3.3.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[ALT3.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM,ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM,ALT2.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM,ALT1.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM,ALT4.ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM]; IP_SCORE(-2.53)[ip: (-8.15), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.50), asn: 15169(-1.93), country: US(-0.08)]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.23)[-0.226,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 19:58:28 -0000 /me grabs popcorn. /* sorry couldn't control myself */ On Sat, Jan 26, 2019, 11:56 PM Myster.Hide > Le 26/01/2019 =C3=A0 13:50, Carmel NY a =C3=A9crit : > > On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 09:54:05 -0600, Rob Belics stated: > > > >>> It is situations like this that make me love > >>> Microsoft. Connecting a wireless network should not require user > >>> intervention other than choosing the network and entering the > >>> password. > >> FreeBSD is not a consumer operating system. It's not designed to hand > >> hold anyone. That is why Windows is such a huge monstrosity of an > >> install. > > I just finished a fresh install of Windows 10. If you take the time > > involved in installing a basic MS Windows system vs. a basic FreeBSD > > system, Windows will usually win. A big plus is that Windows actually > > can get a wireless system up and running by itself, sans perhaps > > supplying the password. Does FreeBSD even support using the WPS Button > > on the Wi-Fi Router? Plus, you then have to install a GUI. Now, if you > > want to compare a FreeBSD system sans GUI, you have to compare it > > against a MS Server, not the regular Windows version design for home or > > office users. > > > > This is not about "hand-holding"; it is about bring the OS into the > > modern age. My machine is supposed to be my slave, not the other way > > around. > > > > Thanks for your comment anyway. > > > Windows is your slave? Really? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 20:28:54 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9554A14AD094 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 20:28:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@theory14.net) Received: from bacon.theory14.net (bacon.theory14.net [45.55.200.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9966C06E for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 20:28:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@theory14.net) Received: from remote.theory14.net (remote.theory14.net [173.79.103.82]) by bacon.theory14.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 795FB125E8E for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:28:46 -0500 (EST) Received: from anubis.int.theory14.net (anubis.int.theory14.net [192.168.10.50]) by remote.theory14.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43F6511AB1 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:28:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=theory14.net; s=mail; t=1548534526; bh=xi5G/NNhhrwU23K9cyIVIPA5k/eGHHy7JJrVDIupV3Q=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=gN8KPbgTByfG1gIEkCGtk5TS6BYIIWzvCHfQ7TBwRbvT+5EOR0+mwsk1bPtl5A0Wv X33dv2uOm6OgOCHwQhmGoOQgg2/QY+sUOyRru/UQaFLGh7ePc9ULQ0QGNiwx9YmmMv xNhVTUe/q7vI3wm9NvTBoGXW0erpkwD0BA7nPzds= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Wireless interface From: Chris Gordon In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:28:45 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6263E0A8-BF3A-4287-A161-9DC973562A69@theory14.net> References: To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: AE9966C06E X-Spamd-Bar: + Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=theory14.net header.s=mail header.b=gN8KPbgT; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@theory14.net designates 45.55.200.27 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@theory14.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.58 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[theory14.net:s=mail]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[theory14.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.58)[0.577,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.16)[-0.164,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; IP_SCORE(0.54)[asn: 14061(2.76), country: US(-0.08)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[theory14.net:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[bacon.theory14.net,sausage.theory14.net]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.54)[0.543,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[82.103.79.173.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:14061, ipnet:45.55.192.0/18, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 20:28:54 -0000 > On Jan 26, 2019, at 1:50 PM, Carmel NY wrote: >=20 > On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 09:54:05 -0600, Rob Belics stated: >=20 >>> It is situations like this that make me love >>> Microsoft. Connecting a wireless network should not require user >>> intervention other than choosing the network and entering the >>> password. =20 >>=20 >> FreeBSD is not a consumer operating system. It's not designed to hand >> hold anyone. That is why Windows is such a huge monstrosity of an >> install. >=20 > I just finished a fresh install of Windows 10. If you take the time > involved in installing a basic MS Windows system vs. a basic FreeBSD > system, Windows will usually win. A big plus is that Windows actually > can get a wireless system up and running by itself, sans perhaps > supplying the password. Does FreeBSD even support using the WPS Button > on the Wi-Fi Router? Plus, you then have to install a GUI. Now, if you > want to compare a FreeBSD system sans GUI, you have to compare it > against a MS Server, not the regular Windows version design for home = or > office users. >=20 > This is not about "hand-holding"; it is about bring the OS into the > modern age. My machine is supposed to be my slave, not the other way > around. >=20 > Thanks for your comment anyway. I think you hit the nail on the head of comparing FreeBSD more to = Windows Server versions than the consumer desktop/laptop systems -- = I=E2=80=99ll call these end user systems. That is the better analog and = what I think Rob was trying to convey. Things that are valuable and = desirable on a server may not be so on an end user system and vice = versa. These are two different sets optimizations which often conflict = with each other. For instance, a GUI is most often preferred on an end = user system whereas it=E2=80=99s more of a liability on a server = (remember that in 2008 the =E2=80=9CServer Core=E2=80=9D in Windows = Server 2008 finally introduced a server sans GUI -- something UNIX has = had since the 1970s... ;) ). Now this isn=E2=80=99t to say you can=E2=80=99t use any of the = particular operating systems for either end user or server functions, = but in doing so you will need to compensate for the gap between the = primary design purpose of the system and your use of the system. = Consider if you wanted to run a farm of servers with Windows 10 (not the = Windows Server, but the consumer desktop version). You could do it, but = you=E2=80=99d probably be longing for design and implementation choices = that are made for an operating system focused at being a server. Doing = the opposite results in some of the frustrations you=E2=80=99re having. = There are plenty of people that use FreeBSD as an end user system (and = work continues to improve the experience), but they also understand that = they must bridge the gaps between server design choices and what they = want from an end user system. =20 If you want to use FreeBSD as an end user system, I think the community = welcomes you and is more than happy to help out. Just understand that = it may take a bit more work than something purpose built to be purely an = end user system. Conversely if you want to run a server (or many = servers), I think you=E2=80=99d be pleasantly surprised at how well = suited FreeBSD is for that purpose (and the community will also welcome = you), especially when compared to trying to use an end user system for = that function. I hope that helps explain things a bit more.=20 Chris= From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 22:01:49 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 353CA14B014D for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 22:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott.gasch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wr1-x430.google.com (mail-wr1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6D06F778 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 22:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scott.gasch@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wr1-x430.google.com with SMTP id u4so13923351wrp.3 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:01:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=OgUm0rNCjmg97+oNyXun0GxPssTsegx41lpWnXGW6l0=; b=UoujOGK6ZiYrEHPNVNgXI7fF6yE1N1v9CtIU783ck51lYfYAa2k17fbKBbp6j2jyCe p9yJvZeADhfcP7Bp+Cy/sQMNn81QmJKVVBSd0SojjyLQgwq9IPcB1XyUFuM8JfLvoQws JbbqRy/n2YtqHf8TS/g3bpScx+zTb/n29KGc5iXK0S+Mz1/PIbUnza27CQS6jBhvUTel eOLE+SYxouU8DfOjFDHNyaUQbk7HCTStbRGporuCHGqxyHmplUJu9+xYJdw7zIaKpudZ byoD4uzKMeFEQMgb4BINwrTgdkB0EHBqBJdF+fI6drE/QBjJd2goI44/hY36qKBsq2ac gEHg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=OgUm0rNCjmg97+oNyXun0GxPssTsegx41lpWnXGW6l0=; b=OBxbF+5fMT9+PNvM327XTu5e76sUJxVPdv/6q5VnarRCAkJcdQvfp44/cjAsAqbvF+ s9Swk5QEQw30+szUN4hhQF0W+4Y0aqt5zLnI1EIBQw8+pAme/nWvL1t0LHANgbEAmKGZ hc0rP7YSKdWlUvLaK4+fgy/qET93eb7u2K+oTIQfuyEg4sqj3qX3c34PNhx1PGFcsls5 BWKEbRu+eVabf3V+uHqSE/w2yq+UCvTSRORpR7nAMQ8qzAg6d/9SCJOdgZGelP8fJF2j nm5qno+JBqY4U7xg5V/MhYydgCUrBZ0zJl4A/59qwkDC1DoVEUnH3LLPGZfh7QJUvNSP wwMg== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukemX20BdNJBFCNHPAkRtX87TmKBGYT57bR5kDT9drfgMKp3d0Xv VUNKeqJ5X6w4l6zOmMRJfU+6Ti4wnp/1Fcwu74hLoTws X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN7/qcjf15A4bsoZhN8J0FbKryUdxZ4A6NVmLOpc/5roHFEbskx9TscZCwyXobE/l+iL7kcpi+IaA1k5DRRzA80= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e5c4:: with SMTP id a4mr15561505wrn.157.1548540106032; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:01:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: scott@gasch.org From: Scott Gasch Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 14:02:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: ntpd hangs on boot but works afterwards To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BA6D06F778 X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=UoujOGK6; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of scottgasch@gmail.com designates 2a00:1450:4864:20::430 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=scottgasch@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.75 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[scott@gasch.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2a00:1450:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.96)[-0.964,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; REPLYTO_DOM_NEQ_FROM_DOM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.77)[ip: (-9.60), ipnet: 2a00:1450::/32(-2.26), asn: 15169(-1.93), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[0.3.4.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.5.4.1.0.0.a.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 22:01:49 -0000 Hi, I have a system I recently upgraded to FreeBSD 12 and started getting a weird problem with ntpd. What happens is, on boot, rc.ntpd seems to hang requiring me to go to the console and hit ^C. When I do so it says something like "/etc/rc.d/ntpd interrupted" and continues to boot successfully (including starting sshd later in the process and letting me ssh into the machine). When I ssh in, ntpd is not running. If I just do a /etc/rc.d/ntpd start at that point it works just fine as does a service ntpd start. I am setting the ntpd_sync_on_start rc variable and I do see the -g option on the ntpd process when it starts. The machine clock should be pretty close to the actual time... so I don't suspect this is due to a huge clock skew. It does seem like the network is up and running by the time it hangs -- I see some DHCP messages earlier in the boot process making me believe that we have an IP address and should not be stuck trying to talk to the ntp peers. Does anyone have ideas or seen this before? Thanks in advance. Here are some relevant configs: # *uname -a* FreeBSD wannabe 12.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE-p2 GENERIC amd64 # *grep ntp rc.conf* ntpd_enable="YES" ntpd_sync_on_start="YES" # *cat ntp.conf | grep -v "^#"* server 127.127.1.0 # local clock fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10 server 0.us.pool.ntp.org iburst server 1.us.pool.ntp.org server ntp.ucsd.edu server ns.nts.umn.edu server 0.freebsd.pool.ntp.org iburst server 1.freebsd.pool.ntp.org restrict default limited kod nomodify notrap nopeer noquery restrict 10.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 nomodify notrap restrict -6 default limited kod nomodify notrap nopeer noquery restrict 127.0.0.1 restrict -6 ::1 restrict 127.127.1.0 driftfile /var/lib/ntp/ntp.drift leapfile "/var/db/ntpd.leap-seconds.list" From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 22:27:55 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E0ED14B0C41 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 22:27:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0836370614 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 22:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([92.193.226.69]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue010 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MFbBO-1gy0CR3gB4-00H7ga for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:39:58 +0100 Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 21:39:57 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless interface Message-Id: <20190126213957.adfeb61c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:qqmm6rWjQ5+VHJ6MTTZMPgMIsm2O1PCvErPa58y3LRc96cVQy+R BObaP1BIQ4JQvtGnPWrF/ZpaOjQRUX1EqLykqRHdt5hgTjLYHRRiafVze465GXM27i7T1sx 7Ph+SjHyCaNg3drNSZyZINFh8lU7NqiyotY9RqVzotzQbfJHqjn6C5sPGV30At1LKQGvmC0 YrV0eAtuLt5p90ntdkLig== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:kdaX8D/XRTk=:+JquTHfVgJVjAYT6iZ70LW +RiiXJRoS+xbYBIzON+LZmgQjKyfqgiW395ZZemYyqIc8ZXLm7853BCRUIjLWgDBE7R6nsdjn SyIRyNcUBpXbDRfS8kK1tGZZKy8Ma/Uhn172i+oMIOKxGnSvXwVbq1xiJ3l9F3JYorYPrMWBW yWWBrjmskUgCesIoFydAhYqND+DJNznoNmhSnwe5eaqlekoFvs5mbQH9VOd2qDO/5kvUYwISa 8MRkkOi1R4/Ol8CnfOvzFGGACuVTJpURP/xS74XP4Mgr+N9+Y/QOHfPHZOORjyLhC4Mmq1oC6 CNBnnvPbw/SAMky2Q4hSW4qs9kKC1EAScn0yX8KuTP3GIcPad9wOuTlY0sqjrlZzebhRbJsuH HFcF7mxzQxHK5o3z7SBnwFwcEuHsEqIp3AQ0lgqAsh9k8HmlosnRUateiMSuB3Xhj1qFlPfPt Jh3HO0la641N7gcFvlQcxBe5c0PPlqPimiG2OtIA1rb10H94ckDRh06WppAFetzoXc4DYfDaW bTF+HJ9Uyg3RUk8Jq4JYh19PyyE6JsBl8VrV2A5clDE3ZZf2XZXpY4H5eyYD2I46dWqUgqbQ3 kyb23iTwI7jWeuUc5CK4KIhYQGTABZ6GsMpConRdDIJJhj5HkoSWpVB3I9LSrw7vp0b1PJpza yv1cSrRU/wmNv+9PMiB8Rt7tTfzbgkSgjfhNg0u59X0JHQCYXjyh6KS6p5x3nbAgrx5mAKhiH EsbpvCPcqGqRCpNdoCw5Hrt5OSgBTlGoQn/vde/07ZQU7w05TWdxa+XHkUA= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0836370614 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [6.29 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx01.schlund.de,mx00.schlund.de]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[69.226.193.92.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.99)[0.986,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(1.00)[0.999,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[133.126.227.212.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; IP_SCORE(0.92)[ip: (3.07), ipnet: 212.227.0.0/16(-0.66), asn: 8560(2.18), country: DE(-0.01)] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 22:27:55 -0000 On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:50:53 +0000, Carmel NY wrote: > Plus, you then have to install a GUI. Now, if you > want to compare a FreeBSD system sans GUI, you have to compare it > against a MS Server, not the regular Windows version design for home or > office users. Your comparison of "Windows 10" vs. FreeBSD is also unfair. You'd better compare it to a FreeBSD-based preinstalled and preconfigured system, such as TrueOS (ex PC-BSD), where you get a GUI and a set of common applications in the normal install. Plus you do _not_ get spyware preinstalled. ;-) You also are not urged to register an account with a US-based company, which is a win in itself. Always remember that there are many people who are willing to provide confidential information for no good reason to any computer program or web page that asks for it. "The computer should know what it's doing. If it says, 'enter your PIN here', I enter my PIN here. I have nothing to hide. And I want to see the dancing elephants for free." ;-) > This is not about "hand-holding"; it is about bring the OS into the > modern age. My machine is supposed to be my slave, not the other way > around. This is very interesting: You consider a "Windows"-based computer still a PC, a _personal_, YOUR _personal_ computer? Especially with the consumer-enabled background updating processes (good _and_ bad at the same time), system changes are very often a surprise for users, and in most cases, it's the kind of "it doesn't work anymore" kind of surprise... "Windows" might be okay for certain cases, as long as it works. But as soon as something does not work, or stops working, you have nearly no on-board diagnostic means. You can hope that the next update will make the printer work again, or that if you delete and re-install the scanner driver, the scanner will work again. But you don't know for sure. Hope is what you need. FreeBSD, on the other hand, allows you to find out by yourself what might be wrong. Its ability to break down obscure and closed processes like "connect to a WLAN", which is in fact a quite complex process, makes it far easier to debug things. Just a few independent thoughts. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Jan 26 23:09:03 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 177A914B1DE1 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 23:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it1-x12a.google.com (mail-it1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B2B87173C for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 23:09:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jd1008@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id h193so14572504ita.5 for ; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:09:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4kKKg5gDrZ0rA6FO9dZWg5ccR/Anekec3pmV6EBQw6k=; b=p0nhFcF2AF3lMiY0U9vOdD71xmOcsw21cxbyXG/0X5VZ43W2yHZiATWEtQ3/kdZZvS LSgqYou/bq2mvuQmFS46lDoOJ08B3+ulruLnpU6OC0obRDPWqqQe/90dPgx8bhcXnb4d XlRdLu1jSL/0uSdyvnLGiMCG5Mh3zahD4AXnWG6BMzrPTyjovtH7sL4kVd1iETgNnZjg 4BCIiVQkqs1MywxvMEEwrk/qSDYDINGmbCilGXJ7pHtPzMHNRyhHWzofXsGH5GFGR/37 IOgHp7uwjnSSLSUBJGzsPsuImEK1brbJsNNOPYGLjAHuOFbmZm+L0OKyIf5NDCn1zBfK baRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4kKKg5gDrZ0rA6FO9dZWg5ccR/Anekec3pmV6EBQw6k=; b=S/LeYmOY62ynjTT56S5ULgtFAO/XhFRqTp0sG8hEfu/Ir3WxRyJEspAwPzMyo+fM2V PfWa/ytwQBRPEj+dVooloWf0lJ6XN10UnByRqx48mMmPMR3mkG/bOnjRlGfEWlKNiwXc E4Ul2E/Lnu5k7jCTB+pi8Y7zAofyxmAmKLct4E60DVoK85JUNF4WTP+ZALuQxdv6g6Dg C3PnrwnZbqbmNg6ilw6nSaHrnF4ziv4NIVQ73A//mSzgXaUrpupNFQNmGqcvlC4CY1Ep qPKgmAGYjSf9clFssaXlY3KB/CoyGxQht3hmsrqy268wiCQTHG6rpBnSvV6qMHdZokQP 2FaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukfEbuWxlT38vt81zskB6TKIae59GJuGbQ2DJ41J/yu+qFYGY/Bv XhkdwE9dqwLkVkK4xm7JVdZAZ1W3 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN5WA+Xg2RKwd9zMCeq5i6MFmUnc6TzaUV0wa9g0Gv0Ww4v5pU6SHlVq9wpChQMRBZW9z7BGAg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:660c:5d4:: with SMTP id x20mr6961986itk.143.1548544140970; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:09:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (50-243-4-3-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.243.4.3]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 14sm25072179itm.3.2019.01.26.15.08.59 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 26 Jan 2019 15:09:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5C4CE8B8.4030608@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:09:44 -0700 From: JD User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wireless interface References: <20190126213957.adfeb61c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20190126213957.adfeb61c.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 2B2B87173C X-Spamd-Bar: ------ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=p0nhFcF2; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jd1008@gmail.com designates 2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jd1008@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-6.57 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2607:f8b0:4000::/36]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.985,0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2607:f8b0::/32, country:US]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com.dwl.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; IP_SCORE(-2.57)[ip: (-8.35), ipnet: 2607:f8b0::/32(-2.49), asn: 15169(-1.93), country: US(-0.08)]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[a.2.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.0.0.4.6.8.4.0.b.8.f.7.0.6.2.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 23:09:03 -0000 On 01/26/2019 01:39 PM, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:50:53 +0000, Carmel NY wrote: >> Plus, you then have to install a GUI. Now, if you >> want to compare a FreeBSD system sans GUI, you have to compare it >> against a MS Server, not the regular Windows version design for home or >> office users. > Your comparison of "Windows 10" vs. FreeBSD is also unfair. > You'd better compare it to a FreeBSD-based preinstalled and > preconfigured system, such as TrueOS (ex PC-BSD), where you > get a GUI and a set of common applications in the normal > install. Plus you do _not_ get spyware preinstalled. ;-) > > You also are not urged to register an account with a US-based > company, which is a win in itself. Always remember that there > are many people who are willing to provide confidential > information for no good reason to any computer program or web > page that asks for it. > > "The computer should know what it's doing. If it says, 'enter > your PIN here', I enter my PIN here. I have nothing to hide. > And I want to see the dancing elephants for free." ;-) > > > >> This is not about "hand-holding"; it is about bring the OS into the >> modern age. My machine is supposed to be my slave, not the other way >> around. > This is very interesting: You consider a "Windows"-based > computer still a PC, a _personal_, YOUR _personal_ computer? > Especially with the consumer-enabled background updating > processes (good _and_ bad at the same time), system changes > are very often a surprise for users, and in most cases, it's > the kind of "it doesn't work anymore" kind of surprise... > > "Windows" might be okay for certain cases, as long as it works. > But as soon as something does not work, or stops working, you > have nearly no on-board diagnostic means. You can hope that > the next update will make the printer work again, or that if > you delete and re-install the scanner driver, the scanner will > work again. But you don't know for sure. Hope is what you need. > FreeBSD, on the other hand, allows you to find out by yourself > what might be wrong. Its ability to break down obscure and > closed processes like "connect to a WLAN", which is in fact > a quite complex process, makes it far easier to debug things. > > Just a few independent thoughts. :-) > > IMHO, today, there are no OS'es available to the public, sans backdoors, spyware and other malware. Just my $.02's worth.