From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 19:37:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2DA16A4CE for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:37:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B7043D4C for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:37:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8DJZrYa030571; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:35:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 13:36:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20040913.133635.102122423.imp@bsdimp.com> To: phk@phk.freebsd.dk From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <71269.1095061526@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <20040912.153323.115746063.imp@bsdimp.com> <71269.1095061526@critter.freebsd.dk> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [BIKESHED] Giving abort(2) a reason X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:37:18 -0000 In message: <71269.1095061526@critter.freebsd.dk> "Poul-Henning Kamp" writes: : In message <20040912.153323.115746063.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: : : >You proposed 'put this into dmesg, with a lot of other stuff and then : >abort the program.' I was wanting 'put this into dmesg' and nothing : >else... : : The reason why I don't like that is that it opens us up to a DoS. : By having the syscall abort the process we make it a lot harder to : spam the kernel. That's actually a good reason... Warner