From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 21 20:35:30 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9D737B401
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ints.mail.pike.ru (ints.mail.pike.ru [195.9.45.194])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD1043FE0
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Mon, 21 Apr 2003 20:35:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from babolo@cicuta.babolo.ru)
Received: (qmail 54057 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2003 03:53:20 -0000
Received: from babolo.ru (HELO cicuta.babolo.ru) (194.58.226.160)
  by ints.mail.pike.ru with SMTP; 22 Apr 2003 03:53:20 -0000
Received: (nullmailer pid 880 invoked by uid 136);
	Tue, 22 Apr 2003 03:38:29 -0000
X-ELM-OSV: (Our standard violations) hdr-charset=KOI8-R; no-hdr-encoding=1
In-Reply-To: <003b01c307f5$8c936e00$0480763e@semhome>
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 07:38:29 +0400 (MSD)
From: "."@babolo.ru
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99b (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <1050982709.421032.879.nullmailer@cicuta.babolo.ru>
cc: ports@freebsd.org
cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com>
cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: [kris@freebsd.org: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 03:35:30 -0000

> Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Hm, execuse me my sarcasm, but do we really need the second portupgrade
> > in C???
> 
> I see two main reasons:
> 1) portupgrade is not in base system and never be there because of ruby.
> 2) Because it is in ruby :)
3) Because it do not works on RO mounted /usr/ports