Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:32:37 -0800 (PST) From: "Chris H" <chris#@1command.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bind 9.6.2 dnssec validation bug Message-ID: <44cfde0a1632dfe8d5684c35929c3252.HRCIM@webmail.1command.com> In-Reply-To: <20110210224703.GB57818@lonrach.keltia.net> References: <4D4F4544.3010606@csub.edu> <20110207045802.GB15568@icarus.home.lan> <4D4F8E34.7030904@FreeBSD.org> <4D4F927C.7040103@csub.edu> <20110210224703.GB57818@lonrach.keltia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, February 10, 2011 2:47 pm, Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Russell Jackson: > >> Looks like I should just suck it up and start using the bind97 port. >> > > Or switch to unbound. Unless you need/allow recursion for your internal || stealth || seconds/slaves In fact, that's the _only_ reason I haven't already switched to unbound. --Chris > > > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr > In memoriam to Ondine : http://ondine.keltia.net/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44cfde0a1632dfe8d5684c35929c3252.HRCIM>