From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov 26 18:52:18 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7BF5A6F
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:52:18 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A6C78FC16
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:52:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.219.130.115] ([66.175.245.1]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAQIq4eS003879
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO)
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:52:05 -0600 (CST)
 (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com)
Message-ID: <50B3BA6E.7060303@tundraware.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:52:30 -0600
From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com>
Organization: TundraWare Inc.
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: When Is The Ports Tree Going To Be Updated?
References: <50B2A57A.3050500@tundraware.com> <50B2A8D8.90301@FreeBSD.org>
 <50B2AA07.8090103@tundraware.com> <201211251856.40381.lumiwa@gmail.com>
 <50B2BEE1.9030903@tundraware.com> <loom.20121126T120530-186@post.gmane.org>
 <05eafe033134e0771d54dec2d9388c8f@homey.local>
 <loom.20121126T161423-178@post.gmane.org>
 <C1998C36-57DF-4ACE-8AF2-09E1885E7176@my.gd>
 <loom.20121126T170433-746@post.gmane.org>
 <loom.20121126T182635-720@post.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <loom.20121126T182635-720@post.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:52:05 -0600 (CST)
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more
 information
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: qAQIq4eS003879
X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com
X-Spam-Status: No
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 18:52:18 -0000

On 11/26/2012 11:37 AM, jb wrote:
> jb <jb.1234abcd <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> >...
>>>> > > ># portsnap fetch extract
>>>> > > ># ls -al /usr/ports/IN*
>>>> > > >-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  26879597 Nov 26 15:37 /usr/ports/INDEX-7
>>>> > > >-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  26763600 Nov 26 15:38 /usr/ports/INDEX-8
>>>> > > >-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  26744834 Nov 26 15:38 /usr/ports/INDEX-9
>>>> > > >-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   1654048 Nov 11 11:45 /usr/ports/INDEX-9.bz2
> One detail.
> The size of /usr/ports/INDEX-9 is 26744834.
>
	

<SNIP>

One wonders if using svn to keep the ports tree up-to-date might not be
simpler, and perhaps, more reliable ...



-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Daneliuk