From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 7 11:12:39 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC1616A4CE for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 11:12:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk1.snu.ac.kr (auk1.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5180843D2F for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2004 11:12:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (spamrefuse@yahoo.com) by auk1.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004110720:12:23:659745.15450.2720140208 for ; Sun, 07 Nov 2004 20:12:23 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <418E0326.2070409@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 20:12:38 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20041017 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <418DFD15.2010409@yahoo.com> <20041107105130.GB74864@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> In-Reply-To: <20041107105130.GB74864@shellma.zin.lublin.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: YES-__TRSYS_LV__3 (SR:-7.62) (SRN:SPAMROBOT) ----------------- Subject: Re: using only swap file without swap partition: OK? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 11:12:39 -0000 Pawel Malachowski wrote: > On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 07:46:45PM +0900, Rob wrote: > > >>So, why not using swapfile without swap partition at all. >>Have it on a big partition with lots of space. If there's a >>problem with the space, I can easily move the swap elsewhere. >>A swapfile is so much more flexible. >> >>Is there a downside of not using swap partition, and have only >>swapfile instead? > > > What about saving kernel crashdumps? :) Saving what? I add swap to my system just for having more virtual RAM during regular operation of the OS. I don't have, and I'm not interested in kernel crashes. In that case, is there no difference between the use of swap partition and swapfile? Rob.