Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 22:01:00 +0800 From: KT Sin <ktsin@acm.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw breakage in 5.2 Message-ID: <20031207140100.GA63013@passion.hsins.com> In-Reply-To: <20031206134723.GH75620@elvis.mu.org> References: <20031206134303.GG75620@elvis.mu.org> <20031206134723.GH75620@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Had this problem before, when the kernel and userland got out of sync. kt On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 05:47:23AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Ok, nevermind, I don't see how 'lo' got used instead of 'lo0' > but that's what appears to have caused it. > > * Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> [031206 05:43] wrote: > > Sorry if this is a false alarm, but with the "open" firewall > > ruleset in effect: > > > > # ipfw l > > 00100 allow ip from any to any via lo > > 00200 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > > 00300 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > > 65000 allow ip from any to any > > 65535 allow ip from any to any > > > > I can't ping my loopback: > > > > # ping localhost > > PING localhost (127.0.0.1): 56 data bytes > > ping: sendto: Permission denied > > > > is this known/expected? > > > > > > -- > > - Alfred Perlstein > > - Research Engineering Development Inc. > > - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684 > > -- > - Alfred Perlstein > - Research Engineering Development Inc. > - email: bright@mu.org cell: 408-480-4684
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031207140100.GA63013>