Date: Sun, 27 Oct 1996 13:13:25 -0800 (PST) From: Veggy Vinny <richardc@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: Edwin Burley <khan@vnet.net>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@ki.net>, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: -current failed Message-ID: <Pine.PTX.3.95.961027131133.11159Q-100000@soda.CSUA.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95.961027160250.1713C-100000@maryann.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 27 Oct 1996, Chuck Robey wrote: > I just realized why what I said above is wrong. JDP wrote cvsup in > Modula-3, which is itself big enough to choke a horse, so cvsup will not > go into the source tree without a rewrite. Yes, it's much better, and > static versions (not requiring the modula-3 shared libs) are in incoming > at ftp.freebsd.org. CVSup will fix many problems with your sources that > sup won't. Does cvssup work the same way as sup as it'll just update the src tree with the updated files or will it rewrite the entire thing each time? Vince GaiaNet Corporation - Unix Networking Operations - GUS Mailing Lists Admin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.PTX.3.95.961027131133.11159Q-100000>