Date: Thu, 09 May 1996 15:30:09 -0500 From: Randy Terbush <randy@zyzzyva.com> To: davidg@root.com Cc: stable@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Continued MBUF problem with ET V.35 card Message-ID: <199605092030.PAA01625@sierra.zyzzyva.com> In-Reply-To: davidg's message of Thu, 09 May 1996 12:54:06 -0700. <199605091954.MAA02913@Root.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Are your sure there really is a leak? What does the machine do other than > >> operate a sync card? > > > >It's running routed and named and at this time has had very little use > >due to instability. I've never seen this kind of MBUF usage on any machine > >and that does count for quite a few. It consistently grows to the max > >configured, and then will reboot shortly thereafter. > > > >Are you running routed? > > Not currently, but I have in the past. I am running named. I'm going to direct a copy of this back to the current and stable lists... I have been able to pin this down to routed, or rather the use of a routing protocol, since firing up gated to use RIP has the same effect. (growth of mbuf use by about 10mbufs/30sec). I've read some other questions raised lately about routing/routed problems. Anyone have a hint as to what might be going on here?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605092030.PAA01625>