Date: Mon, 7 May 2001 14:51:52 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Cc: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk>, hubs@FreeBSD.ORG, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: We seriously need a cleanup on ftp-master Message-ID: <20010507145152.B12252@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20010507164104.I3246@casimir.physics.purdue.edu>; from will@physics.purdue.edu on Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:41:04PM -0500 References: <20010507125604P.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <20010507231953.A41580@skriver.dk> <20010507142813.A12106@dragon.nuxi.com> <20010507164104.I3246@casimir.physics.purdue.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:41:04PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > > I have always kept one usable Alpha -current snapshot on the FTP site. > > current.freebsd.org isn't mirrored, thus anyone wanting to access it has > > to do to that one site. Why mirror ftp.freebsd.org at all then? > > BTW, my experiences for the past several years is that connectivity to > > current.freebsd.org is less than usable quite often. > > Well, I doubt that many people use the snaps at all. So I think having > separate sites for them is an OK idea. An Alph snap is 180MB. Is diskspace *that* tight? I understand getting rid of cruft when cruft is 50% of /pub/FreeBSD, but clearly useful bits have to go too? I did delete the older of the two Alpha snaps. > Perhaps we should keep a small > number of "known working" snaps on the ftp site, I guess. That *IS* what I've been saying (and doing). :-) -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010507145152.B12252>