Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:50:12 -0500 From: Stephen Clark <sclark46@earthlink.net> To: VANHULLEBUS Yvan <vanhu@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NAT-T + ipsec integration Message-ID: <4942B264.5020607@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <20081212175500.GA2573@zeninc.net> References: <20081211122828.CF3958FC16@mx1.freebsd.org> <20081211123958.GA5332@zeninc.net> <200812121845.20262.artem@aws-net.org.ua> <20081212175500.GA2573@zeninc.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 06:45:20PM +0200, Artyom Viklenko wrote: >> On Thursday 11 December 2008 14:39:58 VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > [....] >>> Actually, you can apply a patch to src/sys and recompile your kernel >>> with IPSEC_NAT_T options. >>> Patches are available here: >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~vanhu/NAT-T/ >> And what about patches for 6.4-RELEASE? > > I just not tested on 6.4 (almost all my devices moved to 7.x, and the > remaining ones will stay in 6.3 for various reasons), but 6.3 patch > should work on 6.4 if it compiles cleanly (I did NOT check every > single kernel change between 6.3 and 6.4). > > If people can test it and see some compile/runtime problems, please > report them, I'll try to fix them. > > > > Yvan. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Are there any restrictions for nat-t on freebsd-6, like number of vpns that can be natted? Thanks, Steve -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." (Thomas Jefferson)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4942B264.5020607>