Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:41:33 +0100 (CET)
From:      =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= <bkoenig@alpha-tierchen.de>
To:        ticso@cicely.de
Cc:        arm@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: defining the main clock frequency of AT91 boards
Message-ID:  <60965.192.168.1.2.1205786493.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20080317201833.GC72551@cicely12.cicely.de>
References:  <50161.192.168.1.2.1205540152.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> <20080316.154215.1387160441.imp@bsdimp.com> <20080317014143.GQ67602@cicely12.cicely.de> <51329.192.168.1.2.1205776085.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> <20080317180315.GA72551@cicely12.cicely.de> <56448.192.168.1.2.1205780988.squirrel@webmail.alpha-tierchen.de> <20080317201833.GC72551@cicely12.cicely.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bernd Walter wrote:

> AFAIK PLLA is not setup in the kernel - it is done by the board firmware.
> So defining xtal frequency in the kernel has no influence on that.

Oh, you've got me there. I forgot that. - My patches do in-kernel
reconfiguration of the PLLA.

Björn





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?60965.192.168.1.2.1205786493.squirrel>