Date: Fri, 02 Oct 1998 21:28:16 -0700 From: dmorrisn <dmorrisn@u.washington.edu> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, James Love <love@cptech.org>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Device Drivers for Linux and Intel's annoucement Message-ID: <3615A7E0.DD936974@u.washington.edu> References: <23307.907176696@time.cdrom.com> <4.1.19981002190913.040f3b60@mail.lariat.org> <4.1.19981002202119.040f7c30@mail.lariat.org> <4.1.19981002204214.0420a940@mail.lariat.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If you're unwilling to make the obvious and trivial mental connections My singular point was that your argument made a false connection. If you'd like to reverse my own argument on me that's fine with me, but I was hoping you'd say something interesting. Moreover, at least my example had a clear cause and effect reason to it -- where yours argued that freebsd would be affected in "exactly the opposite" way of that which is intuitive. Yes, it's possible for non-intuitive things to happen, but when they haven't already happened and someone yells, "Stop the train!", I think you should expect some reasonable scrutiny. > required to comprehend the information I presented in my message, it's > not MY problem. I simply expect your argument to contain facts rather than simply discrediting those who oppose it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3615A7E0.DD936974>