From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 3 10:21:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0A9A413; Sat, 3 May 2014 10:21:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay001.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D04FF1CD1; Sat, 3 May 2014 10:21:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlkGAMzCZFNR8aZZ/2dsb2JhbABYgwaBGsRjgQ4XdIIlAQEFOhwjEAsOCgklDyoeBhOIRQHKEBeOUgeEOgEDjTWLfYdiixODNjs Received: from 89.166-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.166.89]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 03 May 2014 12:21:40 +0200 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s43ALduS001005; Sat, 3 May 2014 12:21:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 12:21:38 +0200 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Julio Merino Subject: Re: Can fmake be deleted? Message-ID: <20140503122138.0b2a4b43@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20140422202506.GA63561@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140422214610.GC63561@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: sjg@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 May 2014 10:21:48 -0000 On Fri, 2 May 2014 16:13:46 -0700 Julio Merino wrote: > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> - Can fmake be removed from base even if ports hasn't yet dropped its >>> support for fmake? >> >> Yes as right now we do support both > > So, given this and that there has been no comment otherwise for 10 > days... I take it that I could remove fmake from the tree anytime > soon. (Whether I have the time to do so or not is another story ;-) Also, for those who might still need it there's devel/fmake.