Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2020 21:01:18 -0700 From: Donald Wilde <dwilde1@gmail.com> To: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: question on porting Message-ID: <CAEC7392XcSd=uhtifOLnnbcf1Gew-9%2BDgGWih0hGrT_i01TMfQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJuc1zOtoTVOqb-kok8Njx7jbfXEJZ%2B5O58GVVCfQ43n9LS2wQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAEC73934akXpUU50Z8WDS0nakQ5Dy73FhTGUh8vpKv%2B8r0ArEg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJuc1zOtoTVOqb-kok8Njx7jbfXEJZ%2B5O58GVVCfQ43n9LS2wQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/9/20, Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2020 at 15:09, Donald Wilde <dwilde1@gmail.com> wrote: > [...] >> On the specific synth crash, If I re-run it, does synth have code that >> reorders failed ports such that it has a better chance of not having >> such swap-space faults/failures happen? > > No, it doesn't. > > However, if you're experiencing crashes it may be better for you to > lower your "Number_of_builders" and/or "Max_jobs_per_builder" in your > /usr/local/etc/synth/synth.ini. > Thanks, Jon. I'll look at that after this finishes and after I fix the known OOPS I caused myself. What happened is that it was building both llvm80 and gcc9 at the same time. I can see that now it's building llvm90 and it's been at it for over 2 hours. Obviously this is going to become a problem again although the next time I build a disk I can use more of it for swap. It's not processor speed that is the problem now, although if I alter those parameters what is now 11 hours will become 20. Such is life with "old" computers... :D -- Don Wilde **************************************************** * What is the Internet of Things but a system * * of systems including humans? * ****************************************************
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEC7392XcSd=uhtifOLnnbcf1Gew-9%2BDgGWih0hGrT_i01TMfQ>