From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 19 16:53:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192D3DB6 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:53:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erdgeist@erdgeist.org) Received: from elektropost.org (elektropost.org [217.13.206.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695A8644 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64859 invoked from network); 19 Mar 2013 16:53:30 -0000 Received: from elektropost.org (HELO elektropost.org) (erdgeist@erdgeist.org) by elektropost.org with CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 19 Mar 2013 16:53:30 -0000 Message-ID: <5148980A.1070408@erdgeist.org> Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 17:53:30 +0100 From: Dirk Engling User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130307 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: sib@tormail.org Subject: Re: Handbook Jail Chapter rewrite available for critique References: <1UHfYF-000LVV-4Y@internal.tormail.org> In-Reply-To: <1UHfYF-000LVV-4Y@internal.tormail.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:53:39 -0000 On 18.03.13 20:16, sib@tormail.org wrote: > to configure things themselves. In my experience, ezjail is a much better > solution. I also see that you are the maintainer/author of qjail and like > to shovel your opinion as the only solution, both in this "rewrite" and > all over the FreeBSD forums. Taking a look at the qjail code I can not help to notice several odd similarities with the ezjail-admin script, down to the very basic bail out routines. I would not go so far to claim it was just a global search/replace job but to me the code looks familiar enough to find the # Copyright 2010, Qjail project. All rights reserved. offensive. I am usually quite open with the license of my software, beerware is as permissive as it gets. I just can not take some script kiddie right out copying my code verbatim and selling it as his, not even acknowledging me as the original author. Anyone here with suggestions how to properly react to this kind of "fork"? erdgeist