From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Oct 24 17: 0:50 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from hera.drwilco.net (10dyn220.dh.casema.net [212.64.31.220])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350AA37B479
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:00:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ceres.drwilco.nl (ceres.drwilco.net [10.1.1.19])
	by hera.drwilco.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id CAA32056
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 02:12:26 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from drwilco@drwilco.nl)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.0.20001025020806.00ae7250@mail.drwilco.net>
X-Sender: drwilco@mail.drwilco.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 02:09:51 +0200
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
From: "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" <drwilco@drwilco.nl>
Subject: Re: "make release" breakage - dokern.sh patch 2 
In-Reply-To: <21764.972427694@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
References: <Message from Motomichi Matsuzaki <mzaki@e-mail.ne.jp>
 <86y9zedlqq.wl@tkc.att.ne.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>Believe me, if we were to put out a serious call to kill NFS from the
>installation boot images, you'd very quickly hear from all of those
>people and they would be screaming.  We need to exhaust all other
>possibilities before we even contemplate that option.

Are there maybe other large pieces which could use something like 
NFS_NOSERVER is to NFS?

         DocWilco



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message