From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 12 09:58:12 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D4D16A4CE for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:58:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DAFF43D48 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:58:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 3062B1C0009E for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:58:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 13DA21C0008C for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:58:10 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050212095810814.13DA21C0008C@mwinf1101.wanadoo.fr Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 10:58:09 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <126689881.20050212105809@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <200502112325.j1BNPw201164@clunix.cl.msu.edu> <1108168477.45718.19.camel@p4><1108178253.46376.11.camel@p4> <583702950.20050212044425@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Please don't change Beastie to another crap logo such as X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:58:12 -0000 Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: > This is all very well and good, but is irrelevant to the earlier > discussion. It doesn't have to be relevant to the earlier discussion. It is very highly relevant to FreeBSD. > You are not a Suit we are trying to impress or get to use FreeBSD. You > are on a general technical support mailing list and "behavior" here is > different than would be in a formal presentation or even official > support mechanism. The problem is that this is the only behavior there is for the moment. There is no official support mechanism, and I daresay there is virtually no one who can do good formal presentations of the OS, either. -- Anthony