Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 07:40:25 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com> To: Gregory Sutter <gsutter@pobox.com> Cc: Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG, de-bsd-chat@DE.FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE 6.0 SMP by factor 2.3 !!! Message-ID: <19990315074025.A2402@titan.klemm.gtn.com> In-Reply-To: <19990314184616.G20826@orcrist.mediacity.com>; from Gregory Sutter on Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 06:46:17PM -0800 References: <19990315001521.A39079@titan.klemm.gtn.com> <19990314184616.G20826@orcrist.mediacity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 06:46:17PM -0800, Gregory Sutter wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 12:15:21AM +0100, Andreas Klemm wrote: > > See the links in my signature ... > > > > Enjoy it ... Linux brings 0% performance gain in the "stable" system > > SMP arena ...... > > > > -- > > Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas > > News : FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE Linux 6.0 SMP by 230% !!! > > See : http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/benches/index.html > > http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html > > Well, if you wanted this to be really public, you picked the right way > to go about it. Just wait until someone drops this onto the linux > lists. I wonder what the signal:flame ratio will be. Bets, anyone, on > time to slashdot, as well as the ratio? I added a note, about why I compared FreeBSD 3.1 with SuSE Linux 6.0 kernel version 2.0.36. I only wanted to compare two _stable_ systems as they ship... -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas News : FreeBSD 3.1 SMP outperforms SuSE Linux 6.0 SMP by 230% !!! See : http://www.freebsd.org/~andreas/benches/index.html http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990315074025.A2402>