Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 10 Feb 1996 19:47:19 -0700
From:      Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To:        Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? 
Message-ID:  <199602110247.TAA02717@rover.village.org>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:43:18 PST

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


: I really don't want to get into a ssh vs kerberos war, we can certainly
: run both of them.  Rather, I'd just like to point out:

:-)

: ssh is good for peer-to-peer secure communications
: 
: kerberos is good for intra-organization communications

This is a good summary.  While you can do inter-organizational
communications with kerberos, it is a little painful :-(

Warner

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBMR1Yrtxynu/2qPVhAQH1gAP/QV5QZ7jGJ7LqIW3EEWDRKqlAq8QdVx1z
Cl7V7W5GiKz5+rsB3PYGJFEdAKbo6DGksZzs5fY4vCwukoUFrgn08lPPg1uxg2UH
a+7nJKl8cyrG/+mmIx79rZ0A1nPPGNcOinRwB94mn8Uj5sia+AM2fSWbxZeouqgB
2ZD9ejNKZK4=
=c9ro
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602110247.TAA02717>