From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Jun 15 11:29:34 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209D137B401
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2659043F75
	for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 11:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h5FITWkA054567;
	Sun, 15 Jun 2003 12:29:32 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 12:28:52 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030615.122852.26275397.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: iedowse@maths.tcd.ie
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <200306151406.aa36218@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <200306151406.aa36218@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Message buffer and printf reentrancy patch
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 18:29:34 -0000

In message: <200306151406.aa36218@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
            Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> writes:
: occur via tputchar() when using xconsole, and generally make the
: use of printf() in the kernel a bit safer. Many of the ideas here
: were suggested by Bruce Evans.

Safe enough to be used for ddb?  That is, can we get the ddb output in
out dmesg buffers?

Warner